Theard v. State

861 So. 2d 103, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19197, 2003 WL 22956435
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-752
StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 103 (Theard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theard v. State, 861 So. 2d 103, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19197, 2003 WL 22956435 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The conviction and sentence imposed below for violating an injunction against domestic violence, see section 741.31, Florida Statutes (2001), after a two-day, three-witness jury trial, is reversed for a new one because of the grossly abusive limitation of counsel to five minutes for final argument. See Stockton v. State, 544 So.2d 1006 (Fla.1989); Munez v. State, 643 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Adams v. State, 585 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Foster v. State, 464 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

We find no merit in the other points presented. See Franklin v. State, 825 So.2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Crume v. State, 703 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. State
464 So. 2d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Adams v. State
585 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Franklin v. State
825 So. 2d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Crume v. State
703 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Stockton v. State
544 So. 2d 1006 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Munez v. State
643 So. 2d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 So. 2d 103, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19197, 2003 WL 22956435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theard-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.