Theano v. Marsh & McLennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Theano v. Marsh & McLennan

64 A.D.2d 761, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 761 (Theano v. Marsh & McLennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theano v. Marsh & McLennan, 64 A.D.2d 761, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 19, 1977, as amended by a supplemental decision filed October 6, 1977. The primary issue in this case was whether or not the employer had any knowledge of a condition of the employee—an operation whereby a bone was [762]*762removed from her wrist—which was a permanent impairment. The board found upon "the credible testimony” that the employer had no good faith belief of a previous permanent impairment. There is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Special Fund against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 19, 1977, as amended by a supplemental decision filed October 6, 1977. The primary issue in this case was whether or not the employer had any knowledge of a condition of the employee—an operation whereby a bone was [762]*762removed from her wrist—which was a permanent impairment. The board found upon "the credible testimony” that the employer had no good faith belief of a previous permanent impairment. There is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Special Fund against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 761, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theano-v-marsh-mclennan-nyappdiv-1978.