The W. H. Flannery

Second Circuit

The W. H. Flannery

249 F. 349, 161 C.C.A. 357, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2219

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1918

DocketNo. 56

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 249 F. 349 (The W. H. Flannery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The W. H. Flannery, 249 F. 349, 161 C.C.A. 357, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2219 (2d Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question which this case presents involves no question of law. The District Judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, has found as a fact that the collision was occasioned by the Flannery’s failure to comply with the signal given by the Beard and which the Flannery had accepted. This court is reluctant to disturb a conclusion of fact reached by a trial judge, who had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question which this case presents involves no question of law. The District Judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, has found as a fact that the collision was occasioned by the Flannery’s failure to comply with the signal given by the Beard and which the Flannery had accepted. This court is reluctant to disturb a conclusion of fact reached by a trial judge, who had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F. 349, 161 C.C.A. 357, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-w-h-flannery-ca2-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack