The Vizcaya

38 F. Supp. 1020, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3375
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJanuary 13, 1941
DocketNo. 869
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 F. Supp. 1020 (The Vizcaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Vizcaya, 38 F. Supp. 1020, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3375 (D. Mass. 1941).

Opinion

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This libel in admiralty purports to state three claims. Two of the claims are for damage done by a boat to the libellant’s pier. To these claims, the libellee excepts. Although in matters of contract the test of jurisdiction in admiralty is the nature of the contract, the test of jurisdiction in matters of tort is the locality of the damage. Accordingly, there is no jurisdiction in admiralty over damages to a pier attached to land and the libellee’s exceptions are sus[1021]*1021tained. Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Company v. Cleveland Steamship Co., 208 U.S. 316, 28 S.Ct. 414, 52 L.Ed. 508, 13 Ann. Cas. 1215; Martin v. West, 222 U.S. 191, 32 S.Ct. 42, 56 L.Ed. 159, 36 L.R.A.,N.S., 592; Hughes on Admiralty, Chapter IX

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Perth Amboy v. N. N. Petterson Lighterage Co.
58 F. Supp. 423 (D. New Jersey, 1945)
The Nootka Sound
51 F. Supp. 544 (W.D. Washington, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 F. Supp. 1020, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-vizcaya-mad-1941.