The Vizcaya

38 F. Supp. 1020, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3375
District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided January 13, 1941·No. No. 869·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This libel in admiralty purports to state three claims. Two of the claims are for damage done by a boat to the libellant’s pier. To these claims, the libellee excepts. Although in matters of contract the test of jurisdiction in admiralty is the nature of the contract, the test of jurisdiction in matters of tort is the locality of the damage. Accordingly, there is no jurisdiction in admiralty over damages to a pier attached to land and the libellee’s exceptions are sus[1021] tained. Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Company v. Cleveland Steamship Co., 208 U.S. 316, 28 S.Ct. 414, 52 L.Ed. 508, 13 Ann. Cas. 1215; Martin v. West, 222 U.S. 191, 32 S.Ct. 42, 56 L.Ed. 159, 36 L.R.A.,N.S., 592; Hughes on Admiralty, Chapter IX

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Vizcaya, 38 F. Supp. 1020, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3375 (D. Mass. 1941).

38 F. Supp. 1020 (The Vizcaya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Perth Amboy v. N. N. Petterson Lighterage Co.
58 F. Supp. 423 (D. New Jersey, 1945)
The Nootka Sound
51 F. Supp. 544 (W.D. Washington, 1943)