THE VEIN & VASCULAR INSTITUTE OF SPRING HILL, PLLC v. MARK GOCHENOUR
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
THE VEIN & VASCULAR INSTITUTE OF SPRING HILL, PLLC; THOMAS M. KERR, individually, and doing business as THE VEIN & VASCULAR INSTITUTE OF TAMPA BAY; and THOMAS M. KERR, M.D., P.A.,
Appellants,
v.
MARK GOCHENOUR,
Appellee.
No. 2D23-584
February 16, 2024
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Rex M. Barbas, Judge.
Guy M. Burns and Gary Ragnar Von Stange of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, St. Petersburg; and Sharon E. Krick of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, Clearwater, for Appellants.
David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte, Gilbert, McNamara & Caldevilla, P.A., Tampa; J. Daniel Clark of Clark Martino, P.A., Tampa, and Christopher S. Polaszek of The Polaszek Law Firm PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
THE VEIN & VASCULAR INSTITUTE OF SPRING HILL, PLLC v. MARK GOCHENOUR (THE VEIN & VASCULAR INSTITUTE OF SPRING HILL, PLLC v. MARK GOCHENOUR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.