The Vargin

185 F. 1007, 107 C.C.A. 398, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4063
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1911
DocketNo. 200
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 F. 1007 (The Vargin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Vargin, 185 F. 1007, 107 C.C.A. 398, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4063 (2d Cir. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion, interest should not he added to the amount awarded by the court’s decision, intermediate the filing of the opinion and the entry of the decree, unless the delay in entering decree is attributable in some way to claimant, which does not appear to be the case here. Judge Hand’s opinion (180 Fed. 892) sets forth the facts with great fullness, and as appellant concedes with accuracy. Since we are satisfied with his reasoning imd concur in his conclusion, further discussion seems unnecessary. With the modification above suggested, the decree is affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Buckhannon
284 F. 917 (S.D. New York, 1922)
The West Mount
277 F. 168 (Second Circuit, 1921)
The Melderskin
249 F. 776 (S.D. New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 F. 1007, 107 C.C.A. 398, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-vargin-ca2-1911.