The Vargin

Second Circuit

The Vargin

185 F. 1007, 107 C.C.A. 398, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4063

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 13, 1911·No. No. 200·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion, interest should not he added to the amount awarded by the court’s decision, intermediate the filing of the opinion and the entry of the decree, unless the delay in entering decree is attributable in some way to claimant, which does not appear to be the case here. Judge Hand’s opinion (180 Fed. 892) sets forth the facts with great fullness, and as appellant concedes with accuracy. Since we are satisfied with his reasoning imd concur in his conclusion, further discussion seems unnecessary. With the modification above suggested, the decree is affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion, interest should not he added to the amount awarded by the court’s decision, intermediate the filing of the opinion and the entry of the decree, unless the delay in entering decree is attributable in some way to claimant, which does not appear to be the case here. Judge Hand’s opinion (180 Fed. 892) sets forth the facts with great fullness, and as appellant concedes with accuracy. Since we are satisfied with his reasoning imd concur in his conclusion, further discussion seems unnecessary. With the modification above suggested, the decree is affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

The Vargin, 185 F. 1007, 107 C.C.A. 398, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4063 (2d Cir. 1911).

Pincite

185 F. 1007 (The Vargin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related