The United States of America v. Brutus Lewis
Opinion
Defendant, Lewis, was convicted below, after waiving a jury, for violating 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 2554 (a). He contends that the government’s evidence failed to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree. United States v. Aman, 7 Cir., 1954, 210 F.2d 344, 349; United States v. Holmes, 7 Cir., 1951, 187 F.2d 222. It would neither aid defendant, nor do more than accumulate precedent on well-settled principles, to detail all the facts we encountered canvassing this record. We are satisfied reversible errors are absent and fundamental rights unimpaired.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
220 F.2d 357 (The United States of America v. Brutus Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.