The Union Bank v. Randel
3 Del. 416
Opinion
thought it was. They referred to the rules of’ court; (Rule 6, 2 Harr. Rep. 162;) and to the case of Potter vs. White, ante 329. They said, however, that a writ could not‘be issued after the meeting of the court, on the first day of the term, returnable to that term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Union Bank v. Randel, 3 Del. 416 (Del. Ct. App. 1842).
3 Del. 416 (The Union Bank v. Randel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Petition for Review of the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Sharpley
120 A. 586 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1923)