The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.

Fifth Circuit

The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.

339 F.2d 261, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 3, 1964·No. 20620·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In a full and carefully documented opinion the district court properly decided this controversy. State of Alabama v. Kelley, M.D.Ala.1963, 214 F.Supp. 745. No good purpose would be served by this Court’s paraphrasing and expanding the opinion of the district court. Subject to further proceedings in the district court, in accordance with that court’s retention of jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any equities between the parties not previously determined, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In a full and carefully documented opinion the district court properly decided this controversy. State of Alabama v. Kelley, M.D.Ala.1963, 214 F.Supp. 745. No good purpose would be served by this Court’s paraphrasing and expanding the opinion of the district court. Subject to further proceedings in the district court, in accordance with that court’s retention of jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any equities between the parties not previously determined, the judgment is affirmed.

The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama., 339 F.2d 261, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

339 F.2d 261 (The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related