The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.
This text of 339 F.2d 261 (The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a full and carefully documented opinion the district court properly decided this controversy. State of Alabama v. Kelley, M.D.Ala.1963, 214 F.Supp. 745. No good purpose would be served by this Court’s paraphrasing and expanding the opinion of the district court. Subject to further proceedings in the district court, in accordance with that court’s retention of jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any equities between the parties not previously determined, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
339 F.2d 261, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-tri-state-corporation-inc-v-the-state-of-alabama-on-the-relation-of-ca5-1964.