THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ELLIOTT COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2011·No. CA 10-02373·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

453 CA 10-02373 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,

V ORDER

ELLIOTT COMPANY, ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC., CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON, CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, CARRIER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

HANCOCK & ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (ALAN J. PIERCE OF COUNSEL), AND MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, NEW YORK CITY, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JONES DAY, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA (MICHAEL H. GINSBERG, OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BAR, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ELLIOTT COMPANY AND ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.

MENDES & MOUNT, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ALEXANDER J. MUELLER OF COUNSEL), AND MCDERMOTT & BRITT, P.C., SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON AND CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered December 9, 2009. The order denied the motion of defendant Carrier Corporation for partial summary judgment against defendants Elliott Company and Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ELLIOTT COMPANY, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ELLIOTT COMPANY (THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ELLIOTT COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.