The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF DOC CONNECTICUT, DATE FILED:__ 8/9/2023 Plaintiff, 1:21-cv-2625 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL SELECTIVE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed by the parties that they have reached a settlement [ECF No. 36]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore is made by September 9, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). The pending motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 32] is DENIED as moot. All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED.
Date: August 9, 2023 f K / here New York, NY MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.