The Transit

24 F. Cas. 134, 4 Ben. 567
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The Transit. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 F. Cas. 132
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 15, 1871·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

In this case, the libel must be dismissed, with costs. The credit was not given to the vessel. No circumstances existed, to the knowledge or belief of the furnisher of the supplies, showing any necessity for a credit' to. the vessel. The furnisher had no information, until after the supplies were furnished, that the vessel was under charter to a person residing out of the state of New York. The fact that, in this case, the libellant billed the coal to the vessel and owners, makes no difference, nor does it make any difference that the master had to do with procuring the coal. There may be, in both cases, a good claim against the owners of the vessel, her charterer, and her master, in personam, but there is no lien on the vessel, which can be enforced in admiralty. The difficulty is, that credit was not, in fact, given to the vessel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Transit, 24 F. Cas. 134, 4 Ben. 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1871).

24 F. Cas. 134 (The Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.