The Town of North Hempstead v. . Oelsner
This text of 102 N.E. 1102 (The Town of North Hempstead v. . Oelsner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that no material question is presented by the record which this court can review. The records, to the receipt of which the appellant objected and excepted, were properly received in evidence. Their construction and effect were submitted to the juiy for its determination without objection to such submission or to the charge of the court on which they were submitted. The unanimous affirmance of the judgment by the Appellate Division precludes us from considering the question of whether the jury properly decided those issues; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Cuddebaoic, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E. 1102, 208 N.Y. 626, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-town-of-north-hempstead-v-oelsner-ny-1913.