The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence
This text of 102 N.E. 1115 (The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without deciding whether the case is one in which the appellant can effectually stipulate for judgment absolute in case of affirmance as required by section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure (See People ex rel. Judson v. Thacher, 55 N. Y. 525), we are of the opinion that the argument of this appeal should at least be postponed until the hearing of the appeal from the judgment which may be rendered on the new trial which all of the defendants except this appellant have taken or until the further order of the court. (See Williams v. Western U. Tel. Co., 93 N. Y. 162, 193.)
Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E. 1115, 209 N.Y. 513, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-town-of-hempstead-v-lawrence-ny-1913.