The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence

New York Court of Appeals

The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence

102 N.E. 1115, 209 N.Y. 513, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 859

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Without deciding whether the case is one in which the appellant can effectually stipulate for judgment absolute in case of affirmance as required by section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure (See People ex rel. Judson v. Thacher, 55 N. Y. 525), we are of the opinion that the argument of this appeal should at least be postponed until the hearing of the appeal from the judgment which may be rendered on the new trial which all of the defendants except this appellant have taken or until the further order of the court. (See Williams v. Western U. Tel. Co., 93 N. Y. 162, 193.)

Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Without deciding whether the case is one in which the appellant can effectually stipulate for judgment absolute in case of affirmance as required by section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure (See People ex rel. Judson v. Thacher, 55 N. Y. 525), we are of the opinion that the argument of this appeal should at least be postponed until the hearing of the appeal from the judgment which may be rendered on the new trial which all of the defendants except this appellant have taken or until the further order of the court. (See Williams v. Western U. Tel. Co., 93 N. Y. 162, 193.)

Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence, 102 N.E. 1115, 209 N.Y. 513, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 859 (N.Y. 1913).

Pincite

102 N.E. 1115 (The Town of Hempstead v. . Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related