The Tomkins-Johnson Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

The Tomkins-Johnson Company v. National Labor Relations Board

570 F.2d 150

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 1978

Docket76-1719

StatusPublished

This text of 570 F.2d 150 (The Tomkins-Johnson Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Tomkins-Johnson Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 570 F.2d 150 (6th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This cause was submitted to this Court on the briefs of counsel. The Court, having considered the briefs and studied the record, and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the finding that Petitioner violated § 8(a)(1) and § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively interrogating and suspending and discharging certain employees. The Court is further of the opinion that the Administrative Law Judge drew no improper inferences from the record and did not err in excluding from his consideration certain evidence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the petition for review is denied and the cross-petition for enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board order is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This cause was submitted to this Court on the briefs of counsel. The Court, having considered the briefs and studied the record, and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the finding that Petitioner violated § 8(a)(1) and § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively interrogating and suspending and discharging certain employees. The Court is further of the opinion that the Administrative Law Judge drew no improper inferences from the record and did not err in excluding from his consideration certain evidence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the petition for review is denied and the cross-petition for enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board order is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 F.2d 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-tomkins-johnson-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1978.