the Texas Workforce Commission v. the Harris County Appraisal District

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 29, 2014
• Docket: 14-14-00631-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 14-14-00631-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014 5:34:01 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

No. 14-14-00631-CV

IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014 5:34:01 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, Clerk

Appellant,

v.

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT,

Appellee.

Appealed from the 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas District Court Cause No. 2012-34688 Hon. Jeff Shadwick, Presiding

BRIEF OF APPELLANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

GREG ABBOTT ALISON ANDREWS Attorney General of Texas Assistant Attorney General Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable DANIEL T. HODGE Trusts Division First Assistant Attorney General State Bar No. 24059381 PO Box 12548 DAVID C. MATTAX Austin, Texas 78711 Deputy Attorney General for TEL: (512) 475-1747 Defense Litigation FAX: (512) 478-4013 alison.andrews@texasattorneygeneral.gov ROBERT O’KEEFE Chief, Financial Litigation, Tax, and ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Charitable Trusts Division

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Appellant's Counsel Counsel for Additional Parties to Trial Court Judgment Alison Andrews Assistant Attorney General J. C. Loftis State Bar No. 24059381 P. O. Box 88135 Assistant Attorney General Houston, TX 77288-0135 Office of the Attorney General ATTORNEY FOR VALLEDA CRUMP Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable Trusts Division Donald DeMoss P.O. Box 12548 5300 Memorial Drive, 650 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Houston, TX 77007 Tel: (512) 475-1747 ATTORNEY FOR RONALD HASTIK Fax: (512) 478-4013 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Lynne M. Jurek TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION Albany L. Willis Kelley, Kronenberg, Gilmartin, Fichtel, Appellees' Counsel Wander, Bamdas, Eskalyo & Dunbrack P.A. Brian J. Begle 1001 McKinney Street, Suite 300 Paula Alexander Houston, TX 77002 Olson & Olson, L.L.P. ATTORNEY FOR LAURA BASS Wortham Tower, Suite 600 2727 Allen Parkway Unrepresented Additional Parties Houston, Texas 77019-2133 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE HARRIS Charles E. McKirahan COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Dempsey Wells Michael Marshall Diane Jobin Monarchie Clay Melia J. Wichmann Phil Ross Janet Sheffield Reese Buggs Gerald Chrisenberry Cynthia A. Spooner Forrest Cresswell

ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

Identity of the Parties ............................................................................................. ii

Index of Authorities .................................................................................................v

Statement of the Case ..............................................................................................1

Issues Presented........................................................................................................1

Statement of Facts ....................................................................................................2

Summary of Argument ............................................................................................7

Argument ..................................................................................................................9

I. The trial court incorrectly treated the HCAD employee question as dispositive of all issues, and setting aside the TWC decisions on this basis constituted error by awarding more relief than was requested.

II. The only question before the Court is whether substantial evidence supports the TWC decisions.

III. The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions ruling the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

A. Members of the ARB are in HCAD’s employment under the general definition in TUCA. B. TUCA contains no exception to employment for members of appraisal review boards and the Legislature explicitly rejected a proposal to add such a provision. C. Members of the ARB do not qualify for the exception for members of the judiciary.

IV. The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions on all issues other than whether the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

iii A. The ARB members filed valid claims for benefits. B. Because the claimants became unemployed through no fault of their own, TWC properly ruled they were qualified for benefits.

Prayer ......................................................................................................................20

Certificate of Compliance......................................................................................22

Certificate of Service..............................................................................................22

Appendix .................................................................................................................36 Tab 1-House Bill No. 982 Tab 2-Unemployment Insurance Program Letter Tab 3-S.B. No. 432 Tab 4-House Journal Tab 5-HB No. 585 Tab 6-Final Judgment Tab 7-Tex. Lab. Code §212.201 Tab 8-Tex. Lab. Code §212.202 Tab 9-Tex. Lab. Code §201.041 Tab 10-40 Tex. Adm. Code §821.5

iv INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

CASES Barnett v. Texas Employment Comm’n,...................................................................18 510 S.W.2d 361, 363 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin 1974, writ ref’d n.r.e.)

Bradley v. State ex rel. White, ..................................................................................27 990 S.W.2d 245 (Tex. 1999)

City of Houston v. Tippy, ..................................................................................15, 19 991 S.W.2d 330, 334 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.)

Collingsworth Gen. Hosp. v. Hunnicut, .................................................................14 988 S.W.2d 706, 708 (Tex. 1998)

Critical Health Connection, Inc. v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n,.................................18 338 S.W.3d 758, 766-767 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, no pet.)

Dotson v. Tex. State Bd. of Med. Examiners,...........................................................14 612 S.W.2d 921, 922 (Tex. 1981).

Dozier v. Tex. Emp. Comm’n, ..................................................................................14 41 S.W.3d 304, 309 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.)

G&H Towing Co. v. Magee, ......................................................................................9 347 S.W.3d 293, 297 (Tex. 2011)

Elgohary v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, No. 14–09–00108–CV,.............................13 2010 WL 2326126, at *2 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] June 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.)

Firemen’s & Policemen’s Civil Serv. Comm’n v. Brinkmeyer, ...............................14 662 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tex. 1984).

Harris County Appraisal District v. Texas Workforce Commission and Jimmy Moreno,....................................................................................................4 No. 2012-25985 (80th Dist. Ct., Harris County, Tex. Mar. 15, 2013. v In re Barr,.................................................................................................................28 13 S.W.3d 525, 532 (Tex.Rev.Trib. 1998)

In re Canales, ...........................................................................................................27 113 S.W.3d 56, 67 – 68 (Tex.Rev.Trib. 2003)

McConnell v. Southside ISD, .....................................................................................9 858 S.W.2d 337, 341 (Tex. 1993)

Madisonville Consolidated Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Tex. Emp. Comm’n,..........................29 821 S.W.2d 310, 311 – 312 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied)

McCrory v. Henderson, ..........................................................................................15 431 S.W.3d 140, 143 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.] 2013, no pet.)

Mercer v. Ross,.........................................................................................................14 701 S.W.2d 830, 831 (Tex. 1986)

Merchant v. State, ..................................................................................................17 379 S.W.2d 924, 925 (Tex. Civ. App—Austin 1964, no writ)

Sledd v. Garrett, .......................................................................................................28 123 S.W.3d 592, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.)

Spicer v. Tex. Workforce Comm’n, ..........................................................................24 430 S.W.3d 526, 534 n.5 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2014, no pet.)

Tex. Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Alford, ..........................................................................14 209 S.W.3d 101, 103 (Tex. 2006)

Tex. Emp. Comm’n v. Camacho,........................................................................15, 32 394 S.W.2d 35, 37 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1965, no writ)

Texas Statutes Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.011(1) ...........................................................................10

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.012(a) (West 2006) ......................................................32

vi Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.041 (West 2006) ...........................................9, 16, 17, 21

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.046 (West 2006) ...................................................18, 19

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.061-201.078 (West 2006) ............................................16

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.063 (West 2006) .....................................................26, 27

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §201.081 (West) ....................................................................17

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §204.101 (West) ...................................................................... 9

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.004 (West 2006) .......................................................9, 16

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.002 (West Supp. 2014) ................................................10

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.003 (West 2006) ...........................................................10

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.021(a) (6) (West Supp. 2014) ......................................10

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.044 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014) .............................12, 32

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.044(b) (West 2006 & Supp. 2014)...............................13

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §207.045 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014) ...................................12

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §208.002 (West Supp. 2014) ................................................11

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §208.002 (a) (West Supp. 2014) .....................................11, 30

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §212.202 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014) .............................13, 18

Tex. Tax Code Ann. §6.411-6.412 (West) ..............................................................22

STATE RULES Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a ...................................................................................................9

STATE REGULATIONS 40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5 ....................................................................18, 21, 22 vii 40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(1) .............................................................................19

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(2) .............................................................................19

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(3) .............................................................................20

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(4) .............................................................................20

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(5) .............................................................................20

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(7) .............................................................................20

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(9) .............................................................................21

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(12) ...........................................................................21

40 Tex. Admin. Code § 821.5(14) ...........................................................................21

Federal Statutes 26 U.S.C.A. §§3302 .................................................................................................25

26 U.S.C.A §§3304 ............................................................................................24, 25

26 U.S.C.A §§3309 ............................................................................................24, 25

viii STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Nature of the Case: Appellee Harris County Appraisal District filed fifteen suits,

each against Appellant Texas Workforce Commission and one former member of

the Harris County Appraisal Review Board, for judicial review of Texas

Workforce Commission decisions. C.R. 53 – 227.

Course of Proceedings: The fifteen suits were consolidated into this cause. C.R.

267. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. C.R. 509 – 618.

Trial Court Disposition: On May 5, 2014, the trial court entered a final judgment

denying Appellant’s motion for summary judgment, granting summary judgment

in favor of Appellee and setting aside the fifteen TWC decisions. C.R. 864 – 866.

Appellant filed a motion for new trial, which the court denied. C.R. 933.

ISSUES PRESENTED

Issue 1: The trial court erred in granting summary judgment on grounds not raised when it set aside the TWC rulings that the claimants were qualified for benefits and named the correct last employer.

Issue 2: The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions ruling the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

1 Issue 3: The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions on all issues other than whether the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Harris County Appraisal Review Board (“ARB”) decides property tax

disputes and is a critical part of the tax valuation process of the Harris County

Appraisal District (“Appellee” or “HCAD”). C.R. 784. Members of the ARB

obtained their positions by first submitting job applications to HCAD. See C.R. 334.

They were called for job interviews by Peggy Mason, Taxpayer Liaison Officer for

HCAD. See id. Mason conducted interviews for the positions. See id. HCAD then

performed background checks on the prospective members. Id.; C.R. 509 – 606.

Once HCAD hired these members, they were required to participate in

training sessions in the building in which HCAD and the ARB were housed. C.R.

334, 509 – 606. Their job duties included hearing and deciding property tax disputes.

C.R. 335, 509 – 606. HCAD directed the ARB members as to which disputes to hear,

where to hear them, and the date and time the hearings were to be held. See C.R. 335.

HCAD also directed the members as to the procedures to follow in conducting the

hearings and issuing decisions. See id. For example, HCAD directed members as to

what evidence should be considered, how many minutes each side should be given

to present its case, how long each entire hearing should last, and when the decision

2 should be issued. See id.

HCAD designated which member would act as the Chairman of the ARB.

C.R. 509 – 606. HCAD provided rooms for the hearings to be held, which were in

the building where both the ARB and HCAD offices are housed. Id.; C.R. 246.

HCAD also provided clerical and support staff as well as all necessary equipment.

C.R. 247, 509 – 606. The relationship was ongoing for the term for which the

member was hired but either party could terminate the relationship early without

risking financial liability. C.R. 379, 509 – 606. Members were precluded from

participating in outside activities that would conflict with their duties for the ARB.

Id.

HCAD paid ARB members from the HCAD budget at a rate set by HCAD.

C.R. 246, 335, 509 – 606. Members were required to submit weekly timesheets

using HCAD’s timekeeping system and were paid an hourly rate. C.R. 246, 335, 509

– 606. HCAD provided members with direct deposit receipts. C.R. 509 – 606.

HCAD withheld taxes from the members’ paychecks. C.R. 509 – 606. At the end of

the year, HCAD provided members with W-2s, rather than 1099’s, stating members

were employees of HCAD. C.R. 509 – 606. HCAD also reported the wages it paid to

the ARB members to the Texas Workforce Commission (“TWC” or “Appellant”) as

wages paid "in employment." C.R. 653 – 672. Accordingly, the members were

3 awarded wage credits with TWC for the money they received from HCAD. Id.

When no work was available or the member was not eligible to serve

additional terms, several of the members filed claims for unemployment benefits.

C.R. 509 - 606. TWC granted the claimants benefits and HCAD filed administrative

appeals. Id. TWC's decision with respect to each claimant included one or more of

the following rulings:

1) that the claimant was entitled to wage credits based on the money he earned

from HCAD because the services he performed on the ARB were in

HCAD's employment (in this chart below, this category of ruling is labeled

“Employment”);

2) that the claimant named the correct last work or filed a valid claim by

correctly naming his last work (in the chart below, “Last Work”); and

3) that the claimant was qualified to receive benefits and HCAD was not

entitled to protection from chargeback because his discharge from HCAD

was not for misconduct (in the chart below, “Separation”).

C.R. 509 – 607.

After exhausting its administrative remedies, HCAD filed sixteen suits for

judicial review of the TWC decisions. C.R. 53 – 227. In one case, Harris County

Appraisal District v. Texas Workforce Commission and Jimmy Moreno, Cause No.

4 2012-25985, in the 80th District Court of Harris County, the trial court granted

summary judgment in favor of TWC and the ARB member and affirmed the TWC

decision. C.R. 432. HCAD appealed to the First Court of Appeals but then withdrew

its appeal. C.R. 434 – 435.

The remaining fifteen suits were consolidated into this action. C.R. 267. The

chart below shows the claimants included in this matter along with which of the

above three rulings were included in the decision being appealed:

Claimant Employment Last Work Separation Charles McKirihan (C.R. 509 – 513) X X Valleda Crump (C.R. 514 – 520) X X X Ronald Hastik (C.R. 521 – 527) X X X Dempsey Wells (C.R. 528 – 533) X X X Michael Marshall (C.R. 534 – 539) X X X Diane Jobin (C.R. 540 – 545) X X X Monarchie Clay (C.R. 546 – 552) X X X Laura Bass (C.R. 553 – 559) X X X Melia Wichman (C.R. 560 – 565) X X X Phil Ross (C.R. 566 – 571) X X X Janet Sheffield (C.R. 572 – 578) X X X Gerald Chrisenberry (C.R. 579 – 585) X X X Reese Buggs (C.R. 586 – 590) X Forrest Cresswell (C.R. 591 – 600) X X Cynthia Spooner (C.R. 601 – 607) X X

As shown in the above chart, three of the decisions included in this case did

not rule upon whether the claimant was in HCAD's employment but only whether

the claimant filed a valid claim and was qualified to receive benefits based on the 5 reason for the separation. C.R. 509 – 513, 586 – 600. With respect to Cynthia

Spooner, TWC ruled the claimant had properly named another employer as her last

work but that she was entitled to wage credits for the services she performed for

HCAD. C.R. 601 – 607.

HCAD filed a Motion for Summary Judgment asserting only that the ARB

members were not its employees. C.R. 230 - 239. The trial court initially denied

Plaintiff's motion. C.R. 448. After TWC filed its own Motion for Summary

Judgment, HCAD filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment that was

identical to the motion the court had already denied. C.R. 465 – 619. HCAD again

moved for summary judgment solely on the grounds that the ARB members were

not its employees and did not address whether the claimants named the correct last

work or whether they should be qualified based on the reasons for their separations

from HCAD. Id.

This time, the trial court granted summary judgment in HCAD’s favor and

denied Appellant's motion. C.R. 864 - 866. Even though HCAD requested summary

judgment solely on the grounds that the ARB members were not its employees, the

court went beyond the relief requested and set aside the TWC decisions entirely. Id.

Appellant filed a Motion for New Trial. C.R. 867 - 919. At the hearing on

Appellant's Motion for New Trial, HCAD acknowledged that it was not disputing

6 whether the members were qualified for benefits based on their separations from

HCAD. R.R. 12:22 - 13:5. The court nonetheless denied Appellant's motion. C.R.

933. This appeal followed.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

The trial court erred by granting summary judgment on grounds not

presented in HCAD’s motion. HCAD’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment

asserts only that the ARB members were not HCAD’s employees. Whether the

ARB members were in HCAD’s “employment” under the Texas Unemployment

Compensation Act (“TUCA”) determines only whether the members are entitled to

wage credits based on the money they earned from HCAD. It is not dispositive of

any other issues contained in the decisions, including whether the members filed

valid claims or should be qualified for benefits based on the reasons for their

separations from HCAD. The trial court nonetheless set aside the TWC decisions

in their entirety. By doing so, the court disqualified the claimants from receiving

any benefits whatsoever, even those based on other employment, without any

support for such a ruling. Because the trial court granted summary judgment on

grounds not requested in HCAD’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, the

order setting aside the TWC rulings regarding the claimants’ last work and

qualification for benefits should be reversed.

7 Furthermore, the trial court erred in denying TWC’s motion for summary

judgment and in granting Appellant’s motion with respect to all the rulings

contained in the decisions because all the rulings are supported by substantial

evidence. A case for judicial review of a TWC unemployment benefits decision

under TUCA contains only a question of law: whether substantial evidence

supports the agency decision. The party challenging the decision bears the heavy

burden of proving the decision is not supported by substantial evidence or is

unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious. TWC properly ruled that the members were

in HCAD’s employment because their performance of their duties was not free

from HCAD’s direction and control and no exception to the general definition of

employment was applicable. TWC’s Motion for Summary Judgment showed

substantial evidence supports those decisions and HCAD’s motion did not destroy

that evidence or show the decisions to be unreasonable or arbitrary and capricious.

TWC’s Motion for Summary Judgment also showed substantial evidence supports

all other rulings contained in the TWC decisions, and HCAD’s motion contained

no evidence or arguments to the contrary. Accordingly, summary judgment should

be granted in Appellant’s favor and the TWC decisions should be affirmed in their

entirety.

8 ARGUMENT

I. The trial court incorrectly treated the HCAD employee question as dispositive of all issues, and setting aside the TWC decisions on this basis constituted error by awarding more relief than was requested.

A motion for summary judgment must state the specific grounds upon which

it is based. Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a. The motion “must stand or fall on the grounds

expressly presented in the motion.” McConnell v. Southside ISD, 858 S.W.2d 337,

341 (Tex. 1993). As a general rule, granting summary judgment on a claim not

addressed in the motion is reversible error. G&H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347

S.W.3d 293, 297 (Tex. 2011).

HCAD moved for summary judgment solely on the grounds that the ARB

members were not its employees. See C.R. 608 – 619. The Texas Unemployment

Compensation Act (“TUCA”) uses the term “employment” to describe the

relationship between a worker and an employer when the worker performs services

under the direction and control of the employer. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.041

(West 2006). If the worker is paid wages for services performed in employment,

rather than as an independent contractor, the worker will receive “benefit wage

credits” for those wages, Tex. Lab. Code § 207.004, and the employer will be

required to contribute to the unemployment compensation trust fund based on

those wages, Tex. Lab. Code § 204.101. To be eligible for benefits, a claimant 9 must have earned a sufficient number of wage credits in her base period, which is

approximately the year-and-a-half prior to filing her initial claim, from all the

entities for which she worked combined. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.021(a)(6)

(West Supp. 2014) 1; see also Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.011(1) (West 2006 &

Supp. 2014) (defining “base period”). The number of wage credits a claimant has

determines her weekly benefit amount. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.002, (West

Supp. 2014); Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.003 (West 2006).

Because TWC determined the ARB members performed services in

HCAD’s employment, they were awarded benefit wage credits for their earnings

from HCAD. All the decisions included in this case except those concerning

Charles McKirihan, Reese Buggs and Forrest Cresswell include rulings affirming

the award of wage credits. C.R. 509 – 607. By asserting that the ARB members

were not its employees, HCAD placed these rulings at issue.

This assertion does not, however, provide any grounds for reversal of any of

the other rulings contained in the decisions. Whether the ARB members were

HCAD’s employees does not affect whether the members named the correct last

1 This section was amended in 2013. At the time TWC issued these decisions, the section pertaining to eligibility based on wage credits was 207.021(a)(5), which was identical to the current 207.021(a)(6). 10 work or are qualified for benefits. These are separate determinations made without

regard to employment status.

By ruling that the claimants filed valid claims or named the correct last

work, the decisions state nothing more than that HCAD was the last entity for

which the claimants performed services prior to filing their initial claims. See Tex.

Lab. Code Ann. § 208.002 (West Supp. 2014). TUCA defines “last work” and

“person for whom the claimant last worked” as:

When used in connection with an initial claim, “last work” and “person for whom the claimant last worked” refer to: (1) the last person for whom the claimant actually worked, if the claimant worked for that person for at least 30 hours during a week; or (2) the employer, as defined by Subchapter C, Chapter 201, or by the unemployment law of any other state, for whom the claimant last worked.

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 208.002(a) (West Supp. 2014). This definition does not

require that the last work be performed in employment. Id. If the last work the

claimant performed was as an independent contractor, the entity for which he

performed those services would still be the correct last work. All the decisions

included in this case include rulings that the claimant properly named his last

work. See C.R. 509 – 607. In its Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, HCAD

made no assertions whatsoever regarding this issue. See generally C.R. 608 – 619.

11 All the decisions except those pertaining to Reese Buggs and Cynthia

Spooner also contained rulings that the claimants were not disqualified from

receiving benefits because they were laid off from their last work and not

discharged for misconduct. C.R. 509 – 607. Whether a claimant is qualified for

benefits is based solely on the reason the claimant was separated from his last work

without regard to whether the last work was performed in employment. See Tex.

Lab. Code Ann. § 207.044 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014) (“An individual is

disqualified for benefits if the individual was discharged for misconduct connected

with the individuals last work); Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.045 (West 2006 &

Supp. 2014) (“An individual is disqualified for benefits if the individual left the

individual’s last work voluntarily without good cause connected with the

individual’s work”). Once a claimant is ruled to be disqualified, that

disqualification remains in place for the entire remainder of the claimant’s benefit

year unless the claimant returns to employment and works for six weeks or earns

six times his weekly benefit amount. Id. In its Amended Motion for Summary

Judgment, HCAD made no assertions whatsoever regarding the reason for the

claimants’ separations from their last work. The court nonetheless reversed these

rulings, leaving the claimants disqualified for the entire benefit year unless they

12 were able to work enough hours or earn sufficient wages to requalify. See Tex.

Lab. Code Ann. §207.044(b) (West 2006 & Supp. 2014).

If the Court were to determine that the ARB members were not in HCAD’s

employment under TUCA without ruling on any of the other issues not raised by

HCAD, the wage credits the members received from HCAD would be deleted and

their benefit amounts would be recalculated accordingly. But, as long as each

member still had sufficient wage credits from other sources and was qualified

based on the reason for his separation from his last work, he could still receive

some benefits. However, by setting aside the TWC decisions entirely, the trial

court invalidated the members’ entire claims and ruled them disqualified for the

entire benefit year. Such relief goes beyond the grounds upon which HCAD moved

for summary judgment and therefore should be reversed.

II. The only question before the Court is whether substantial evidence supports the TWC decisions.

Additionally, Appellant is entitled to summary judgment on all rulings

contained in the decisions because the rulings are reasonable and are supported by

substantial evidence. Judicial review of TWC unemployment benefits decisions is

by trial de novo with substantial evidence review. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 212.202

(West 2006 & Supp. 2014); Elgohary v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, No.

14–09–00108–CV, 2010 WL 2326126, at *2 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 13 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.); Mercer v. Ross, 701 S.W.2d 830, 831 (Tex. 1986).

Under this standard, TWC’s decisions are presumed to be valid, which places the

burden on the party challenging the decision. Collingsworth Gen. Hosp. v. Hunnicut,

988 S.W.2d 706, 708 (Tex. 1998). While the trial court will hear and consider

evidence to determine whether reasonable support for the agency’s order exists, the

agency remains the primary fact-finding body. Firemen’s & Policemen’s Civil Serv.

Comm’n v. Brinkmeyer, 662 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tex. 1984). Whether substantial

evidence supports an administrative decision is strictly a question of law. Tex. Dep't

of Pub. Safety v. Alford, 209 S.W.3d 101, 103 (Tex. 2006).

When a court examines whether there is substantial evidence to support an

agency’s decision, it determines whether reasonable minds could have reached the

same conclusion the agency reached. Dotson v. Tex. State Bd. of Med. Examiners,

612 S.W.2d 921, 922 (Tex. 1981). TWC has the discretion to make credibility

determinations and to attach whatever weight it considers appropriate to various

pieces of evidence. Dozier v. Tex. Emp. Comm’n, 41 S.W.3d 304, 309 (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). A court may not set aside a TWC

decision merely because there was conflicting or disputed testimony or because the

court would have reached a different conclusion if it were the primary factfinder.

Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 931.

14 Because substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla but need not reach

a preponderance, the evidence may preponderate against the decision of the agency

but still amount to substantial evidence. City of Houston v. Tippy, 991 S.W.2d 330,

334 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). The Court may not set aside the

agency’s decision simply because the Court would have reached a different result

but only if it finds that the decision was made without regard to the law or the facts

and therefore was unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. McCrory v. Henderson,

431 S.W.3d 140, 143 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.] 2013, no pet.); Mercer, 701

S.W.2d at 931 (Tex. 1986).

HCAD had the burden to not only show that another decision could also have

been made but to completely destroy the evidence in support of the TWC decisions.

See Tex. Emp. Comm’n v. Camacho, 394 S.W.2d 35, 37 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1965,

no writ) (“[U]nder the substantial evidence rule our only purpose in examining [the

plaintiff’s evidence] is to determine whether it completely destroys the evidence of

misconduct.”). HCAD failed to carry this burden.

III. The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions ruling the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

15 An individual is entitled to benefit wage credits for all wages earned in

employment. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.004 (West 2006). The Texas

Unemployment Compensation Act (“TUCA”) defines “employment” as:

[A] service, including service in interstate commerce, performed by an individual for wages or under an express or implied contract of hire, unless it is shown to the satisfaction of the commission that the individual’s performance of the service has been and will continue to be free from control or direction under the contract and in fact.

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.041 (West 2006). Chapter 201 also provides specific

exceptions from “employment” for work performed in various industries. See Tex.

Lab. Code Ann. §§ 201.061 – 201.078 (West 2006) (exempting religious service,

service by a relative, certain service on a fishing vessel, etc., from employment).

The claimants were paid by HCAD for the services they performed on the ARB,

those services were performed under HCAD’s direction and control and none of

the exceptions apply. Accordingly, TWC ruled the members were entitled to wage

credits for the wages they received. C.R. 509 – 607. Because such rulings require

HCAD to pay additional contributions to the unemployment compensation trust

fund, HCAD brought this suit seeking reversal of the TWC decisions that the

members were its employees. However, these decisions are supported by

substantial evidence and therefore should be affirmed.

16 A. Members of the ARB are in HCAD’s employment under the general definition in TUCA. TUCA defines employment as a service performed for wages unless it is

shown to be free from direction and control. Tex. Lab. Code § 201.041. It defines

wages as “all remuneration for personal services.” Tex. Lab. Code § 201.081.

Thus, under the plain language of the statute, payment for services to a worker

creates a presumption that the worker is an employee of the remunerating

employer. The burden under the law then shifts to the employer to establish that

the worker is free from control or direction in the performance of his or her

services. Merchant v. State, 379 S.W.2d 924, 925 (Tex. Civ. App—Austin 1964,

no writ).

The evidence shows that HCAD paid members of the ARB for the services

they provided. C.R. 246, 335, 509 – 606. HCAD filed wage reports with the TWC

in which it listed members of the ARB as its employees. CR. 653 – 672. HCAD

withheld taxes and filed W-2’s with the I.R.S. as though the members were its

employees. C.R. 509 – 606. The members were paid from the HCAD budget. Id.

To rebut the presumption of employment, then, HCAD had to establish that

the members were free from its control. TWC utilizes twenty factors to analyze

whether the employer had control over the worker’s performance of his duties

17 either in contract or in fact. 2 40 T.A.C. 821.5 (2007); Barnett v. Texas

Employment Comm’n, 510 S.W.2d 361, 363 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin 1974, writ

ref’d n.r.e.). Not all factors may apply in a given relationship and the weight

assigned to each factor may vary depending on the circumstances. 40 T.A.C. §

821.5. Even if the employer did not actually exercise control, an employment

relationship exists as long as the employer reserved the right to do so. See 40

T.A.C. § 821.5. Moreover, the employer can delegate the authority to control the

work to other individuals or employers. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.046 (West

2006); Critical Health Connection, Inc. v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n, 338 S.W.3d

758, 766-767 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, no pet.).

The Court reviews TWC’s decision under the substantial evidence standard

of review. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 212.202 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014). Thus, as

long as there is more than a mere scintilla of evidence that the members were

subject to some control, or evidence that HCAD had the right to control the

2 A full copy of the twenty-factor test laid out in the Administrative Code is included in Appendix A. In short, the factors that tend to indicate employment are: 1) instructions; 2) training; 3) integration of the worker’s services into the business; 4) requirement that services be rendered personally; 5) the employer hires and pays any helpers; 6) continuing relationship; 7) employer sets hours of work; 8) full time work required; 9) employer determines the location; 10) employer sets the order or sequence of work; 11) oral or written reports required; 12) payment by the hour, week or month; 13) payment of business and travel expenses; 14) furnishing tools and equipment; 15) the employee has little or no investment in the business; 16) the employee may not realize a profit or loss; 17) the employee may only work for one firm at a time; 18) an employee does not make services available to the public; 19) the employer has the right to discharge without liability; and 20) the employee may quit without liability. 18 members, the TWC decision should be upheld. See Tippy, 991 S.W.2d at 334.

There is substantial evidence to support TWC’s rulings that HCAD controlled the

members’ work. Indicia of the control exercised by HCAD include the following:

• HCAD directed the ARB members as to which disputes to hear,

where to hear them, and the date and time the hearings were to be held. See

C.R. 335. HCAD also directed the members as to the procedures to follow in

conducting the hearings and issuing decisions, including what evidence

should be considered, how many minutes each side should be given to

present its case, how long each entire hearing should last, and when the

decision should be issued. See id. Instructions such as these are a strong

indication of control. See 40 T.A.C. § 821.5(1). Even when these

instructions were given by the Chairman, the Chairman was selected by

HCAD, C.R. 509 – 606, and HCAD’s delegation of control to a specific

individual does not alter the analysis, see Tex. Lab. Code § 201.046.

• The members were required to participate in training sessions

held in the building that housed HCAD and the ARB. C.R. 335, 509 – 606.

Training is another factor that strongly shows control by the employer. See

40 T.A.C. § 821.5(2).

19 • HCAD has admitted that the ARB is a critical part of its tax

valuation process. C.R. 784. The integration of the worker’s services into the

employer’s business weighs in favor of an employment relationship. See 40

T.A.C. § 821.5(3).

• When members applied for positions as ARB members, an

HCAD employee scheduled and conducted the job interviews. See C.R. 334.

HCAD also conducted background checks. C.R. 509 – 606. This

demonstrates a significant amount of control by HCAD over who may serve

as an ARB member and indicates that that the services had to be rendered by

the individual personally—rather than delegated to others—another factor

favoring employment. See 40 T.A.C. § 821.5(4).

• HCAD supplied clerical and support staff and legal counsel

when needed. C.R. 379, 509 – 606. Independent contractors, on the other

hand, usually hire, supervise and pay their own helpers. 40 T.A.C. §

821.5(5).

• HCAD set the dates and times of the hearings. C.R. 335.

Independent contractors are generally free to set their own hours. 40 T.A.C.

§ 821.5(7).

20 • Hearings were held in rooms provided by HCAD. C.R. 509 –

606. Independent contractors can generally perform the work where they

choose. 40 T.A.C. § 821.5(9).

• ARB members were paid an hourly rate rather than per job,

C.R. 335, 509 – 606, a factor tending to show employment, 40 T.A.C. §

821.5(12).

• HCAD furnished all necessary equipment, C.R. 247, 509 – 606,

as tends to occur in an employment relationship, 40 T.A.C. § 821.5(14).

These are only some of the ways in which HCAD exercised direction and control

over the ARB members. Of the remaining factors in TWC’s test, none would tend

to show the ARB members were independent contractors. See 40 T.A.C. § 821.5.

In fact, HCAD has itself admitted in another case that the ARB members

were not truly independent contractors. See C.R. 786 (“Application of the TWC’s

20-factor test to the actual services of the ARB members shows that they are not

employees, and under some factors, also are not independent contractors.”). While

HCAD may believe the workers exist in some realm between employees and

independent contractors, no such position exists: either the services are performed

free from the employer’s direction and control or they are not. See Tex. Lab. Code

§ 201.041. Here, they are not. 21 Based on these factors, substantial evidence supports the TWC decisions that

members of the ARB were in HCAD’s employment as that term is defined in

TUCA. HCAD did not provide sufficient evidence to carry its burden of proving

otherwise. In fact, the only argument HCAD made to show it did not exert or

reserve the right to exert direction and control over the members was that the Tax

Code prohibits HCAD employees from serving on the ARB and makes it a

criminal offense for HCAD to influence an ARB decision. C.R. 608 – 619; see

Tex. Tax Code §§ 6.411 – 6.412. At best, this shows one area in which HCAD

does not have the right to control the ARB and is no different from any

employment relationship in which an employee is prohibited from working on

matters in which the employee has a conflict of interest. The test of employment

under TUCA is a fact-based analysis that involves weighing all the factors. 40

T.A.C. § 821.5. Simply showing one area in which HCAD did not exert control

over the members is not sufficient to negate the many ways in which it did.

Instead of addressing the many factors showing direction and control,

HCAD primarily argued that the members were not in its employment because

they fell into an exception to employment under the law. C.R. 230 – 239. However,

no such exception applies.

22 B. TUCA contains no exception to employment for members of appraisal review boards and the Legislature explicitly rejected a proposal to add such a provision. TUCA contains no exception to the definition of employment for members

of appraisal review boards. In fact, during the last legislative session, the

Legislature looked at the very question currently before this Court and rejected a

change to TUCA that would exempt ARB members from receiving unemployment

benefits based on services provided to the ARB. Senator Dan Patrick and

Representative Gary Elkins proposed identical amendments to the Labor Code that

would have enacted the following as Section 207.0435:

Benefits are not payable to an individual based on services performed by the individual as a member of the appraisal review board of an appraisal district established under Section 6.41, Tax Code.

Tex. H.B. 982, 83rd Leg., R.S. (2013); Tex. S.B. 432, 83rd Leg., R.S. (2013). The

bills also stated that the change would apply only to a claim for benefits filed with

TWC on or after the effective date of the new statute. Id. Neither bill made it out of

its respective committee.

Having failed to amend TUCA, HCAD advocated for an amendment to the

Property Tax Code that would have exempted ARB members from receiving

unemployment benefits by declaring them to be independent contractors. Tex. H.B.

585, 83rd Leg., R.S. (2013). In laying out the amendment on the House floor, 23 Representative Villarreal said the intent was to correct what he viewed as a

problem: certain ARB members were claiming to be employees and then claiming

unemployment benefits when they left the ARB. 3

However, HB 585 was then referred to the Senate, and when the Senate

Finance Subcommittee on Fiscal Matters considered the bill on May 15, 2013, the

subcommittee proposed a substitute bill with the ARB exemption removed.

Senator Eltife said the exemption was removed because it would conflict with

federal law. 4 Although Michael Gary, counsel for HCAD, testified that he was

concerned about the removal of the exemption, the substitute bill was enacted

without it.

Indeed, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (“FUTA”) sets out numerous

requirements with which a state law must conform in order for the state to receive

funding for the administration of its unemployment compensation trust fund. See

26 U.S.C.A. §§ 3304 – 3309. Each year, the U.S. Secretary of Labor surveys a

state’s unemployment compensation act to ensure compliance with federal law.

Spicer v. Tex. Workforce Comm’n, 430 S.W.3d 526, 534 n.5 (Tex.App.—Dallas

2014, no pet.). To maintain certification for federal funding, the state program 3 A video recording of the debate can be accessed at: http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audio/chamber/83/ under the archived video dated 5/02/2013. HB 585 begins approximately at time index 2:53:25 and goes for about 4 minutes to 2:57:00. 4 This video recording can be accessed at: http://www.senate.state.tx.us/avarchive/. HB 585 begins approximately at time index 12:35 and goes for about 16 minutes to 28:42. 24 must cover certain broad categories of employment as provided in 26 U.S.C.

sections 3304 and 3309. Id. While states may broaden the coverage to include

more categories of individuals, they may not provide less coverage than that

mandated. Id. Section 3309 sets out the exceptions to employment that may apply

with regard to taxed governmental employers such as HCAD. It does not include

an exception for members of appraisal review boards. 26 U.S.C.A. § 3309. If the

U.S. Secretary of Labor determines that a state unemployment compensation act

does not conform to federal law, the state’s eligibility to receive federal funding

may be endangered. In fiscal year 2012, TWC spent $124 million in federal funds

to administer TUCA. Tex. Workforce Comm’n, Self-Evaluation Report to the Tex.

Sunset Advisory Comm’n, Aug, 2013, at 41, available at

https://www.sunset.texas.gov/public/uploads/files/reports/

Workforce%20Commission%20SER%202013%2084%20Leg.pdf. In addition to

the state losing those funds if the statute were found to be out of compliance with

federal law, Texas employers would also no longer be eligible for large federal tax

credits and their effective tax rates would increase from 0.6 percent to 6.0 percent.

See 26 U.S.C.A. § 3302.

HCAD is now asking the Court to enact the same legislation the Texas

Legislature expressly rejected. Just as the U.S. Department of Labor looks at newly

25 enacted statutes to ensure compliance, the federal agency also reviews state court

decisions to see whether the state is interpreting and applying its unemployment

compensation laws in conformity with federal law. See Unemployment Insurance

Program Letter 27-07 Attach. II § 1(d) (Aug. 10, 2007) ("All decisions and orders

issued by state courts involving UC benefits and taxes must be submitted for

review [to the U.S. Department of Labor] to ensure that interpretation of state law

does not conflict with Federal law."). A court ruling that fails to comply with

FUTA could have the same result as a noncomplying statute.

C. Members of the ARB do not qualify for the exception for members of the judiciary. After the Texas Legislature failed to enact a statute excepting members of

the ARB from coverage under TUCA, HCAD asserted in its Amended Motion for

Summary Judgment that ARB members are subject to the exception for “members

of the judiciary.” C.R. 230 – 239. Section 201.063 does provide such an exception,

stating:

a) In this subtitle, “employment” does not include: (1) service in the employ of a political subdivision or of an instrumentality of a political subdivision that is wholly owned by one or more political subdivisions: (A) as an elected official; (B) as a member of a legislative body; (C) as a member of the judiciary; . . .

26 Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.063 (West 2006). No case has previously interpreted

this section as it applies to “members of the judiciary.” However, from its own

language, this section as a whole appears to apply only to legislators, judges and

other elected officials in the strictest sense, whose performance can never truly be

under the direction and control of any entity because they are in the apex positions

of decision-making for the governmental body. They need not commit misconduct

to be replaced at the end of their terms by the voting public but cannot be removed

before such time except in extreme circumstances. See In re Canales, 113 S.W.3d

56, 67 – 68 (Tex.Rev.Trib. 2003) (“[R]emoving a member of the judiciary and

depriving the electorate of its choice of judge is a serious matter . . .”). These

positions differ in those respects from those generally covered by TUCA so an

exception is necessary.

HCAD contends this exception applies to members of the ARB because they

perform some judicial-like functions. Had the Legislature intended for the

exception to apply so widely, it could have used a broader term such as “judicial

officers”, “quasi-judicial officers” or “officials who perform judicial functions”.

The term it chose instead does not include all agency personnel who decide

disputes. See Bradley v. State ex rel. White, 990 S.W.2d 245 (Tex. 1999) (rule

prohibiting judge from testifying “does not only apply to members of the judiciary,

27 but also to those performing judicial functions . . .”); In re Barr, 13 S.W.3d 525,

532 (Tex.Rev.Trib. 1998) (“In a civilized society, members of the judiciary are

significant public figures whose authority necessarily reaches all points within

their respective jurisdiction[s], if not beyond.”).

In support of its position that ARB members are “members of the judiciary”,

HCAD relies primarily on this Court’s opinion in Sledd v. Garrett, 123 S.W.3d

592, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.), which ruled the quasi-judicial

functions performed by ARB members were protected by judicial immunity. Id. at

596. “Although the Panel Members are not judges, the doctrine of judicial

immunity has been applied to quasi-judicial officials in certain circumstances.” Id.

at 594. The fact that ARB members are entitled to one of the protections that

judges receive, however, does not mean they are considered members of the

judiciary in all respects. This is what makes the position quasi-judicial. To

determine whether a specific provision applies, the Court must look at how the

statute or doctrine relates to the functions of the ARB.

Explaining the application of judicial immunity to ARB members, this Court

stated in Sledd, “Judicial immunity furthers the public interest in the administration

of justice by allowing judicial officers to be free to act on their own convictions,

without fear of personal liability.” Id. The primary concern of TUCA, on the other

28 hand, is very different. “The unemployment compensation law is remedial in

nature and should be construed liberally to give effect to its beneficent purposes,”

which is “to provide compensation to those who become unemployed through no

fault of their own.” Madisonville Consolidated Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Tex. Emp.

Comm’n, 821 S.W.2d 310, 311 – 312 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ

denied). HCAD offers no authority to support the proposition that the extension of

exception from receipt of unemployment benefits to quasi-judicial officers would

render them elected officials, members of a legislative body, or members of the

judiciary for the purposes of TUCA.

IV. The trial court erred in setting aside the TWC decisions on all issues other than whether the ARB members were in HCAD’s employment because substantial evidence supports those decisions.

When a claimant files a claim for benefits, he names as his last work

whichever person or entity for which he last performed any services prior to filing

his initial claim, regardless of whether that work was performed in employment or

as an independent contractor. In addition to ruling that the ARB members were in

HCAD’s employment, the TWC decisions also ruled the ARB members named the

correct last employer and were qualified to receive benefits because they were

discharged from the last work for reasons other than misconduct connected with

the work. HCAD had the burden of proving these decisions were not supported by

29 substantial evidence but failed to provide any evidence or arguments whatsoever

regarding these rulings. TWC’s Motion for Summary Judgment shows substantial

evidence supports these rulings. Accordingly, summary judgment should be

entered in favor of Defendants.

A. The ARB members filed valid claims for benefits.

All of the decisions in this case ruled the claimants named the correct last

work, either directly or by stating the claimant filed a valid claim. C.R. 509 – 607.

TUCA states:

When used in connection with an initial claim, “last work” and “person for whom the claimant last worked” refer to: (1) the last person for whom the claimant actually worked, if the claimant worked for that person for at least 30 hours during a week; or (2) the employer, as defined by Subchapter C, Chapter 201, or by the unemployment law of any other state, for whom the claimant last worked.

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 208.002(a) (West Supp. 2014). The claimant’s last work,

then, is simply whichever person or entity for which the claimant last performed

work prior to filing his initial claim regardless of whether that work was performed

in employment or as an independent contractor.

The evidence shows that the claimants correctly named their last work when

filing their initial claims. C.R. 509 – 606. All but one of the claimants last worked

30 for HCAD, and the claimant who worked elsewhere before filing her claim,

Cynthia Spooner, correctly named the other entity as her last work. C.R. 601 – 606.

Therefore, TWC decided they all filed valid claims. Id. HCAD had the burden of

proving these decisions were unreasonable or not supported by substantial

evidence. To carry this burden, HCAD would have had to show that each claimant

worked for another employer after leaving the ARB and before filing his initial

claim. However, HCAD failed to present any evidence or arguments on the issue

whatsoever. See id. Because HCAD failed to carry its burden, the TWC decisions

on the members’ last work and validity of their claims should be affirmed.

B. Because the claimants became unemployed through no fault of their own, TWC properly ruled they were qualified for benefits.

Each of the decision included in this case except those regarding claimants

Reese Buggs and Cynthia Spooner also ruled that the claimant was not disqualified

from receiving benefits because his discharge from HCAD was not for misconduct

connected with the work. C.R. 509 – 607. TUCA provides, in pertinent part:

a) An individual is disqualified for benefits if the individual was discharged for misconduct connected with the individual’s last work. b) Disqualification under this section continues until the individual has returned to employment and: (1) worked for six weeks; or (2) earned wages equal to six times the individual’s benefit amount.

31 Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 207.044 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014). TUCA then defines

misconduct as:

[M]ismanagement of a position of employment by action or inaction, neglect that jeopardizes the life of property of another intentional wrongdoing or malfeasance, intentional violation of a law, or violation of a policy or rule adopted to ensure the orderly work and the safety of employees.

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 201.012(a) (West 2006).

The claimants all became unemployed when no work was available on the

ARB or they had served the maximum number of terms allowed by statute. C.R.

509 – 607. Because they were laid off and not discharged for misconduct

connected with the work, the claimants are qualified to receive benefits. HCAD

made no allegations whatsoever that the claimants committed misconduct. A lack

of available work is precisely the type of situation for which the unemployment

compensation trust fund was established. See Madisonville Consolidated Ind. Sch.

Dist., 821 S.W.2d at 311 – 312.

HCAD had the burden of not only proving the members were discharged for

misconduct but of destroying any evidence to the contrary presented by the

claimants and TWC. Camacho, 394 S.W.2d at 37. However, HCAD presented no

evidence whatsoever on this subject. Because the TWC decisions ruling the

members were qualified for benefits are supported by substantial evidence and

32 HCAD entirely failed to carry its burden of proving otherwise, the TWC decisions

should be affirmed.

PRAYER

The trial court’s order should be reversed because it grants summary

judgment and sets aside the TWC decisions on grounds HCAD did not raise. In

addition, the TWC decisions should be upheld as a whole because they are

reasonable and supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, Appellant Texas

Workforce Commissions asks this Court reverse the trial court’s order in its

entirety and render judgment in favor of Appellant, or, in the alternative, that this

Court reverse the trial court’s ruling that the Appraisal Review Board members are

not employees of the Harris County Appraisal District and remand the case for

further proceedings on all other issues.

Respectfully submitted,

GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas

DANIEL T. HODGE First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID C. MATTAX Deputy Attorney General for Defense Litigation

33 ROBERT O’KEEFE Division Chief, Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable Trusts Division

/s/ Alison Andrews ALISON ANDREWS Assistant Attorney General Bar No. 24059381 Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable Trusts Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 475-1747 (512) 478-4013 - FAX

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

This document complies with the typeface requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a conventional typeface no smaller than 14-point for text and 12-point for footnotes. This document also complies with the word-count limitations of Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i), if applicable, because it contains 7,113 words, excluding any parts exempted by Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(1), as counted by the computer program used to prepare this document.

/s/ Alison Andrews ALISON ANDREWS Assistant Attorney General

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned hereby certifies that on the 29th day of December, 2014, a true and correct copy of the 34 Brief of Appellant Texas Workforce Commission was mailed certified mail, return receipt requested to Attorney for HCAD.

35 APPENDIX

36 TAB 1 By:AAElkins H.B.ANo.A982

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

1 AN ACT

2 relating to the eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits

3 of individuals who serve on the appraisal review board of an

4 appraisal district.

5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

6 SECTIONA1.AASubchapter C, Chapter 207, Labor Code, is

7 amended by adding Section 207.0435 to read as follows:

8 Sec.A207.0435.AAAPPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS. Benefits

9 are not payable to an individual based on services performed by the

10 individual as a member of the appraisal review board of an appraisal

11 district established under Section 6.41, Tax Code.

12 SECTIONA2.AAThe change in law made by this Act applies only

13 to a claim for unemployment compensation benefits filed with the

14 Texas Workforce Commission on or after the effective date of this

15 Act. A claim filed before the effective date of this Act is

16 governed by the law in effect on the date the claim was filed, and

17 the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

18 SECTIONA3.AAThis Act takes effect September 1, 2013.

83R3394 KSD-F 1 TAB 2 TAB 3 By:AAPatrick S.B.ANo.A432

2 relating to the eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits

3 of individuals who serve on the appraisal review board of an

9 are not payable to an individual based on services performed by the

10 individual as a member of the appraisal review board of an appraisal

12 SECTIONA2.AAThe change in law made by this Act applies only

13 to a claim for unemployment compensation benefits filed with the

14 Texas Workforce Commission on or after the effective date of this

15 Act. A claim filed before the effective date of this Act is

16 governed by the law in effect on the date the claim was filed, and

83R3394 KSD-F 1 TAB 4 HOUSE JOURNAL EIGHTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION

PROCEEDINGS

SIXTY-THIRD DAY — THURSDAY, MAY 2, 2013 The house met at 2 p.m. and was called to order by the speaker pro tempore. The roll of the house was called and a quorum was announced present (Recordi436). Present — Mr. Speaker; Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´ rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Absent, Excused — Oliveira. LEAVES OF ABSENCE GRANTED On motion of Representative S. Thompson and by unanimous consent, all members who were granted leaves of absence on the previous legislative day were granted leaves for this legislative day. RULES SUSPENDED Representative S. Thompson moved to suspend all necessary rules to take up and consider at this time, on third reading and final passage, the bills on the local, consent, and resolutions calendar which were considered on the previous legislative day. The motion prevailed. 2202 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

MOTION FOR ONE RECORD VOTE On motion of Representative S. Thompson and by unanimous consent, the house agreed to use the first record vote taken for all those bills on the local, consent, and resolutions calendar that require a record vote on third reading and final passage, with the understanding that a member may record an individual vote on any bill with the journal clerk. LOCAL, CONSENT, AND RESOLUTIONS CALENDAR THIRD READING The following bills which were considered on second reading on the previous legislative day on the local, consent, and resolutions calendar were laid before the house, read third time, and passed by the following record vote (members registering votes and the results of the vote are shown following bill number). (Record 437): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused — Oliveira. SB 162 SB 166 SB 274 SB 276 (Capriglione, Sanford, Schaefer, and Simpson - no)i(143i-i4i-i2) SB 649 (Simpson - no)i(146i-i1i-i2) SB 748 Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2203

SB 820 SB 852 SB 905 SB 965 HB 138 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Schaefer, Simpson, Stickland, and Zedler - no)i(140i-i7i-i2) SB 902 SB 181 HB 274 (Anderson, Capriglione, Flynn, and Schaefer - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 294 (Anderson, Flynn, Frullo, Goldman, Hunter, Kleinschmidt, Kuempel, Lavender, Leach, Parker, Perry, Schaefer, Simmons, Simpson, and Springer - no) (132 - 15 - 2) HB 340 (Anderson, Flynn, and Zedler - no) (144 - 3 - 2) SB 265 (Krause - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 396 (Anderson, Flynn, Simpson, and Zedler - no) (143 - 4 - 2) SB 1041 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Stickland, and Zedler - no) (142 - 5 - 2) SB 334 HB 693 (Krause and Stickland - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 746 HB 796 (Anderson, Burkett, Capriglione, Flynn, Krause, Lavender, Perry, Phillips, Sanford, Schaefer, Simpson, Stickland, and Zedler - no) (134 - 13 - 2) HB 842 HB 843 HB 894 HB 932 SB 412 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Stickland, and Zedler - no) (142 - 5 - 2) SB 458 HB 1018 (Capriglione, Phillips, Sanford, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (142i-i5i-i2) HB 1020 HB 1044 (Anderson, Capriglione, Flynn, Krause, Sanford, Schaefer, Simpson, Stickland, and Zedler - no) (138 - 8 - 2) SB 506 HB 1185 (Krause, Schaefer, and Springer - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 1198 (Krause, Stickland, Taylor, and E. S. Turner - no) (143 - 4 - 2) SB 365 2204 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

SB 611 HB 1224 HB 1249 (Springer - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 1354 HB 1355 HB 1442 HB 1454 (Krause, Schaefer, Simpson, and Stickland - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 1458 HB 1472 HB 1492 HB 1506 HB 1520 SB 595 (Anderson, Flynn, and Zedler - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 1563 (Anderson, Capriglione, Flynn, Schaefer, Simpson, and Zedleri-ino) (141i-i6i-i2) HB 1586 HB 1593 HB 1594 (Taylor - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 1632 HB 1678 (Krause - no) (146 - 1 - 2) SB 795 SB 777 SB 866 HB 1781 HB 1800 (Taylor - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 1801 (Taylor - no) (146 - 1 - 2) SB 366 HB 1874 HB 1875 HB 1888 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Sanford, Schaefer, Simpson, Stickland, E. S. Turner, and Zedler - no) (138 - 9 - 2) HB 1895 SB 411 SB 330 SB 849 Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2205

HB 1947 SB 972 SB 466 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 1971 (Anderson and Flynn - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 1982 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) SB 920 HB 2000 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2028 HB 2029 HB 2055 HB 2099 (Schaefer - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2112 HB 2135 HB 2155 HB 2204 (Krause and Stickland - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2293 HB 2312 (Schaefer - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2318 HB 2356 HB 2362 HB 2407 (Lavender - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2409 HB 2424 HB 2448 (Schaefer - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2474 (Taylor - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2478 (Anderson and Flynn - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2482 (Anderson, Flynn, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 2537 (Krause, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 2549 HB 2550 (Goldman, Leach, R. Sheffield, Simmons, and Springer - no) (142i-i5i-i2) HB 2580 (Capriglione, Harless, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (143 - 4 - 2) SB 655 HB 2610 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) 2206 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

HB 2619 HB 2621 HB 2645 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2688 HB 2704 HB 2718 (Capriglione, Goldman, Hunter, Krause, Kleinschmidt, Lavender, Leach, Parker, Perry, Sanford, Schaefer, Simmons, Simpson, Springer, Stickland, and Taylor - no) (131 - 16 - 2) SB 1489 (Capriglione, Goldman, Isaac, Schaefer, Simmons, Simpson, and Taylor - no) (140 - 7 - 2) HB 2749 HB 2766 HB 2806 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2912 HB 2913 HB 2935 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2947 HB 3028 HB 3063 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3066 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3067 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3097 HB 3125 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3137 HB 3178 HB 3209 (Krause, R. Sheffield, Stickland, and Taylor - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 3212 (Anderson, Capriglione, Flynn, and Schaefer - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 3256 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) SB 1026 HB 3357 HB 3397 HB 3412 HB 3413 HB 3422 HB 3483 (Simpson and Springer - no) (145 - 2 - 2) Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2207

HB 3511 HB 3523 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3662 HB 3677 (Krause - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3729 (Krause and Stickland - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3748 (Burkett, Capriglione, Frullo, Goldman, Gonzales, Harper-Brown, Hunter, Krause, Kleinschmidt, Kuempel, Lavender, Leach, Murphy, Otto, Parker, Perry, Price, Riddle, Sanford, Schaefer, Simmons, Simpson, Springer, E. S. Turner, and Zedler - no) (122 - 25 - 2) HB 3756 (Anderson, Flynn, and Zedler - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 3764 HB 3787 HB 3795 (Capriglione, Sanford, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (143 - 4 - 2) HB 3798 HB 3813 (Sanford and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) SB 1093 HB 3874 HB 3875 HB 3905 HB 3925 SB 471 SB 686 SB 733 HB 154 HB 339 HB 343 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Simpson, and Stickland - no) (142i-i5i-i2) HB 367 (Sanford, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 438 (Anderson, Flynn, and Phillips - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 655 HB 826 HB 1147 HB 1501 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 1544 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 1662 2208 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

HB 1692 (Capriglione, Lavender, Perry, Sanford, Schaefer, R. Sheffield, and Springer - no) (140 - 7 - 2) HB 1724 HB 1846 (Anderson, Flynn, Krause, Simpson, and Stickland - no) (142i-i5i-i2) SB 1537 HB 2094 (Anderson, Capriglione, Flynn, Krause, Sanford, Schaefer, Simpson, Stickland, and Zedler - no) (138 - 9 - 2) HB 2111 (Anderson, Flynn, Schaefer, and Zedler - no) (143 - 4 - 2) SB 1236 HB 2380 HB 2388 HB 2485 HB 2501 (Schaefer - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2509 (Sanford and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 2562 HB 2607 HB 2662 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 2772 (Anderson, Flynn, Frullo, Goldman, Krause, Kuempel, Lavender, Parker, Schaefer, Simmons, Simpson, Springer, and Stickland - no) (134 - 13 - 2) HB 2825 HB 2874 HB 2883 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3070 HB 3085 (Burkett, Capriglione, Frullo, Goldman, Hunter, Kleinschmidt, Kuempel, Lavender, Leach, Murphy, Parker, Schaefer, R. Sheffield, Simmons, Simpson, and Stickland - no) (131 - 16 - 2) HB 3096 HB 3106 HB 3296 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3307 SB 1019 HB 3433 (Capriglione, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 3567 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3578 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3589 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2209

HB 3604 (Anderson and Schaefer - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3605 (Anderson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3613 HB 3659 HB 3739 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3761 (Anderson and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HB 3762 (Krause - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3800 HB 3896 (Simpson - no) (146 - 1 - 2) HB 3935 SB 901 HB 2454 HB 2620 (Harless, Schaefer, and Simpson - no) (144 - 3 - 2) HB 2025 SB 1157 The following resolutions which were laid out on the previous legislative day on the local, consent, and resolutions calendar were adopted by the above referenced vote (Record 437): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting (members registering votes and the results of the vote are shown following bill number). HCR 51 HCR 62 HCR 68 HCR 82 HCR 89 (Schaefer and Simpson - no) (145 - 2 - 2) HCR 59 HCR 96 HR 964 (Oliveira now present) BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS SIGNED BY THE SPEAKER Notice was given at this time that the speaker had signed bills and resolutions in the presence of the house (see the addendum to the daily journal, Signed by the Speaker, Senate List No. 20). LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED The following member was granted leave of absence temporarily for today to attend a meeting of the Conference Committee on SBi1: Pitts on motion of Geren. 2210 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

GENERAL STATE CALENDAR SENATE BILLS THIRD READING The following bills were laid before the house and read third time: SB 885 ON THIRD READING (Harper-Brown - House Sponsor) SB 885, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to notice of utility rate increases. SBi885 was passed by (Record 438): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. SB 971 ON THIRD READING (Deshotel - House Sponsor) SB 971, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the purposes, designation, and funding of a transportation reinvestment zone for port projects; providing authority to issue bonds; authorizing an assessment. SBi971 was passed by (Record 439): 101 Yeas, 44 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Geren; Giddings; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2211

Guillen; Gutierrez; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Kolkhorst; Kuempel; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Patrick; Perez; Phillips; Pickett; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Stephenson; Strama; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zerwas. Nays — Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Capriglione; Carter; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Davis, S.; Elkins; Fallon; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Goldman; Gooden; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hilderbran; Hughes; Isaac; King, S.; Klick; Krause; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Murphy; Parker; Perry; Price; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Springer; Stickland; Taylor; Toth; Turner, E.S.; White; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. Absent — Cortez; Smithee. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 439. I intended to vote yes. G. Bonnen I was shown voting yes on Record No. 439. I intended to vote no. Button I was shown voting yes on Record No. 439. I intended to vote no. Dale I was shown voting yes on Record No. 439. I intended to vote no. Gonzales I was shown voting yes on Record No. 439. I intended to vote no. Phillips SB 349 ON THIRD READING (Creighton - House Sponsor) SB 349, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to standards for power lines. SBi349 was passed by (Record 440): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; 2212 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. GENERAL STATE CALENDAR HOUSE BILLS THIRD READING The following bills were laid before the house and read third time: HB 590 ON THIRD READING (by Naishtat) HB 590, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to determining a child s’ eligibility for a school district s’ special education program on the basis of a visual impairment. HBi590 was passed by (Record 441): 80 Yeas, 63 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Aycock; Bonnen, G.; Canales; Collier; Cortez; Dale; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Giddings; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, S.; King, T.; Kolkhorst; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, R.; Moody; Mun˜oz; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Otto; Patrick; Perez; Pickett; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sheffield, J.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Strama; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Wu; Zerwas. Nays — Anderson; Ashby; Bell; Bohac; Branch; Burkett; Button; Callegari; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Darby; Elkins; Fallon; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Goldman; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hilderbran; Hughes; Isaac; King, K.; King, P.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Miller, Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2213

D.; Murphy; Orr; Paddie; Parker; Perry; Phillips; Price; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, R.; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, E.S.; White; Workman; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. Absent — Burnam; Coleman; Morrison; Raney. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 441. I intended to vote yes. Bohac I was shown voting no on Record No. 441. I intended to vote yes. Cook When Record No. 441 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted no. Morrison I was shown voting no on Record No. 441. I intended to vote yes. S. Thompson HB 6 ON THIRD READING (by Otto, Anchia, Harless, Howard, et al.) HB 6, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the creation and re-creation of funds and accounts in the state treasury, the dedication and rededication of revenue, and the exemption of unappropriated money from use for general governmental purposes. HBi6 was passed by (Record 442): 144 Yeas, 1 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Collier; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Smith; 2214 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Simpson. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. Absent — Coleman; Cortez. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 442 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Cortez (Pitts now present) HB 2503 ON THIRD READING (by Bohac) HB 2503, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the territory that may be included in a single county election precinct. HBi2503 was passed by (Record 443): 146 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Alonzo; Coleman. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2215

HB 2290 ON THIRD READING (by Lozano, et al.) HB 2290, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the use for administrative costs of a portion of money received by certain entities to implement a supplemental environmental project. HBi2290 was passed by (Record 444): 144 Yeas, 1 Nays, 3 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´ rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — White. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C); King, K. Absent — Alonzo; Coleman. STATEMENT OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 444. I intended to vote yes. White HB 1448 ON THIRD READING (by Kuempel) HB 1448, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the use of money deposited to a justice court technology fund in certain counties. HBi1448 was passed by (Record 445): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; 2216 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). HB 1358 ON THIRD READING (by Hunter, Cook, Eiland, Kleinschmidt, Mun˜oz, et al.) HB 1358, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to procedures for certain audits of pharmacists and pharmacies. HBi1358 was passed by (Record 446): 141 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Guillen; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Aycock; Cortez; Darby; Eiland; Gooden; Gutierrez; Keffer. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2217

STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 446 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Cortez When Record No. 446 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Gooden HB 1079 ON THIRD READING (by Smith, Guillen, Kleinschmidt, et al.) HB 1079, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the procedural requirements for action by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on applications for production area authorizations. HBi1079 was passed by (Record 447): 135 Yeas, 10 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Button; Callegari; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Guerra; Guillen; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Burnam; Canales; Collier; Farias; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Ma´rquez; Morrison; Oliveira; Rodriguez, J. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Gooden; Gutierrez; Neva´rez. STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 447 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Gooden 2218 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

When Record No. 447 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted no. Neva´rez HB 7 ON THIRD READING (by Darby, Pitts, Gonzales, Mene´ndez, S. Turner, et al.) HB 7, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the amounts, availability, and use of certain statutorily dedicated revenue and accounts; reducing or affecting the amounts or rates of certain statutorily dedicated fees and assessments. HB 7 - STATEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT REPRESENTATIVE BURNAM:iiMr. Darby, you and I had a little conversation earlier today, and you know that there s’ concern about the impact on the solid waste fee, is that correct? REPRESENTATIVE DARBY:iiThat s’ correct. BURNAM:iiAnd, as you were explaining and laying it out yesterday, there was some conversation about the split. Exactly how has that split been working, and what is your intent for the future? DARBY:iiIt was split 50-50, now it s’ going to be split two-thirds, one-third. Two-thirds to pay the TCEQ to administer the program, and the third going to the local COGs. BURNAM:iiAnd so, it s’ understandable if all they understand is that change in the percentage that a lot of our local governments and COGs could be concerned about this legislation, but what exactly is your intent, and why you think we need to do this? DARBY:iiThe intent is to fully fund the TCEQ to administer the program, but it brings––by doing a third percentage––it brings it more closely aligned to what we appropriate. And the idea is if we r’e not going to continue to accumulate balances into the account, then the urge would be for the appropriations to fully fund, if you will, that third to the COGs. BURNAM:iiSo do you think one of the concerns might be whether or not we r’e actually going to see it fully funded in this appropriation process this session? DARBY:iiI don t’ think it s’ going to be fully funded, but there s’ still an appropriation process that needs to be involved, but, certainly, as we bring that percentage closer, I think it would be certainly argumentative that we should fully fund up to the percentage––up to that third percentage for the COGs. BURNAM:iiSo, perspectively—maybe not this session—you r’e thinking that that s’ something the Appropriations Committee should address? DARBY:iiI think it will be. BURNAM:iiHow are we going to avoid shortfalls in the short term for our short COGs? Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2219

DARBY:iiWell, I don t’ think we r’e going to avoid––certainly, we r’e going to have to have a hand in the appropriation process, and have the Appropriations Committee and this house determine what s’ an appropriate level of funding, but by reducing the incentive to accumulate balances in the GR dedicated account that will give incentive, I believe, to the appropriations process to fully fund. BURNAM:iiYou think by passing this legislation, it will provide an incentive to increase the funding? DARBY:iiHopefully it will. BURNAM:iiOkay, and so how do we make sure that happens? Do the COGs need to become lobbyists? DARBY:iiI think we need to continue to work within the process we have. This allows us to bring more closely in line with the revenue, we r’e reducing the fees, and we r’ e reallocating percentages, so hopefully we can get more to an appropriate figure to fund these COG projects. REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative Burnam moved to print remarks between Representative Darby and Representative Burnam. The motion prevailed. Amendment No. 1 Representative Martinez Fischer offered the following amendment to HBi7: Amend HBi7 on third reading by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTIONS to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter F, Chapter 401, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 401.106 to read as follows: Sec.i401.106.iiDRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED PREVENTION; COLLECTION OF CERTAIN FEES. (a) In this section, "offense relating to the operating of a motor vehicle while intoxicated" has the meaning assigned by Section 49.09(c), Penal Code. (b)iiCourt costs imposed under Article 102.018(e), Code of Criminal Procedure, shall be deposited in a general revenue dedicated account to the credit of the office of the governor to be used and may be appropriated only for the support of programs for the prevention of offenses relating to the operating of a motor vehicle while intoxicated in this state. SECTIONi____.iiArticle 102.018, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended by adding Subsection (e) to read as follows: (e)iiOn the conviction of an offense relating to the operating of a motor vehicle while intoxicated, as defined by Section 49.09(c)(1)(A) or (B), Penal Code, the court shall impose a cost of $10 on a defendant. A cost imposed under this subsection is in addition to a cost imposed under Subsection (a), (b), or (c). Each cost collected under this subsection shall be deposited in the account to the credit of the office of the governor as provided by Section 401.106, Government Code, for the prevention of driving while intoxicated. 2220 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter B, Chapter 102, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 102.0215 to read as follows: Sec.i102.0215.iiADDITIONAL COURT COSTS: CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. A defendant who is convicted of an offense relating to the operating of a motor vehicle while intoxicated shall pay a cost on conviction, in addition to all other costs, to help fund the prevention of driving while intoxicated under Section 401.106, Government Code (Art. 102.018(e), Code of Criminal Procedure) .i.i. $10. SECTIONi____.iiArticle 102.018(e), Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, applies only to a cost on conviction for an offense committed on or after September 1, 2013. An offense committed before September 1, 2013, is governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense was committed before September 1, 2013, if any element of the offense was committed before that date. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Y. Davis offered the following amendment to HBi7: Amend HBi7 on third reading by adding to the end of amended Section 501.138(b-2), Transportation Code, as amended by Amendment 10 by Darby, "The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality by rule shall adopt criteria for making the finding required by this subsection." AMENDMENT NO. 2 - STATEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT REPRESENTATIVE Y. DAVIS:iiWhat I wanted to do was just ask a couple questions, because the amendment was not as––I d’ expected it to have a couple things on it. One was––we were setting out the criterias so that we could make sure that TCEQ had a criteria to how these funds would be spent on various projects, that s’ correct? REPRESENTATIVE DARBY:iiThat s’ exactly correct. Y. DAVIS:iiAnd one of the concerns I had is to make sure that those TIF dollars that were used for nonattainment areas could stay in nonattainment areas? DARBY:iiThat s’ exactly the purpose. Y. DAVIS:iiAnd so I just wanted to make sure that it is not the intent for us to take turf funds from areas who are used for mitigation, is that correct? DARBY:iiThat s’ correct. REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative Y. Davis moved to print remarks between Representative Darby and Representative Y. Davis. The motion prevailed. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2221

HB 7, as amended, was passed by (Record 448): 146 Yeas, 1 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Simpson. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — King, S. The chair stated that HBi7 was passed subject to the provisions of ArticleiIII, Section 49a of the Texas Constitution. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 448 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. S. King HB 29 ON THIRD READING (by Branch, D. Bonnen, Alvarado, Herrero, et al.) HB 29, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to requiring certain general academic teaching institutions to offer a four-year fixed tuition price plan to undergraduate students. HBi29 was passed by (Record 449): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, 2222 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). HB 1803 ON THIRD READING (by Callegari) HB 1803, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the renewal of a controlled substance registration by physicians; changing the payment schedule for a fee. HBi1803 was passed by (Record 450): 145 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Cortez; King, S.; Larson. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2223

STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 450 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Cortez When Record No. 450 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. S. King HB 137 ON THIRD READING (by Raymond and R. Miller) HB 137, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the information reported to the comptroller by a coin-operated machine license holder, the penalty for failure to report that information, and the penalty for gambling promotion. HBi137 was passed by (Record 451): 139 Yeas, 6 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´ rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Schaefer; Simmons; Simpson; Stickland; Toth; White. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Anderson; Cortez; Hughes. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 451 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Cortez 2224 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

HB 772 ON THIRD READING (by Howard, Zerwas, Callegari, J. Sheffield, G. Bonnen, et al.) HB 772, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the immunization data included in and excluded from the immunization registry. Amendment No. 1 Representatives Kolkhorst, G. Bonnen, and J. Sheffield offered the following amendment to HBi772: Amend HBi772 on third reading as follows: (1)iiIn SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 161.007(a)(4), Health and Safety Code (page 2, line 6, house committee printing), between "request removal" and the colon, insert "at any time, including". (2)iiIn SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 161.007(a)(4)(B), Health and Safety Code (page 2, line 9, house committee printing), strike "at the" and substitute "each". (3)iiIn SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 161.007(a)(4)(E), Health and Safety Code (page 2, line 16, house committee printing), strike "and" and substitute "[and]". (4)iiIn SECTION 1 of the bill, in amended Section 161.007(a)(5), Health and Safety Code (page 2, line 17, house committee printing), between "(5)" and "include", insert the following: ensure that an individual or the individual s’ legally authorized representative is not required to request removal from the registry more than one time and that, after a request for removal is made, the individual s’ immunization information will not be included in the registry unless the individual or the individual s’ legally authorized representative submits to the department a written request for inclusion of the individual s’ information in the registry; and (6) (5)iiIn SECTION 10 of the bill (page 11, line 23, house committee printing), between "SECTION 10." and "The changes", insert "(a)". (6)iiImmediately following SECTION 10 of the bill (page 12, between lines 4-5, house committee printing), insert the following: (b)iiThe changes in law made by this Act do not authorize the Department of State Health Services to include in the immunization registry established under Subchapter A, Chapter 161, Health and Safety Code, immunization information of an individual who is 18 years of age or older and whose immunization information was not included in the registry on or before January 1, 2015, unless the department receives immunization data from a health care provider who: (1)iiadministers an immunization to the individual after that date and elects to provide the individual s’ immunization information to the department; and (2)iinotifies the individual before submission of the information to the department: (A)iithat the health care provider is providing the information to the department for inclusion in the registry; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2225

(B)iithat the information will remain in the registry until removal is requested by the individual or the individual s’ legally authorized representative; and (C)iiof the procedures for requesting removal from the registry under Subchapter A, Chapter 161, Health and Safety Code, as amended by this Act. AMENDMENT NO. 1 - STATEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT REPRESENTATIVE HOWARD:iiI want to make sure that this is correct, the way you understand it. You can opt out multiple times through this system, and once you opt out, you are always out unless you consent to be admitted back in? You are out once you opt out? REPRESENTATIVE KOLKHORST:iiCorrect. HOWARD:iiOkay, and that adults are not automatically opted in. That this is mainly–– KOLKHORST:iiYou and I are not in ImmTrac and we will not be in ImmTrac, unless we request to be in ImmTrac. We are given the information by our provider that says we r’e going to put this in, and we have the option at that point to opt out. HOWARD:iiOkay, so, seems to me, do you not think that this clarifies what was brought up yesterday and that we v’ e assured people that you have multiple opportunities to opt out, and once you opt out, you are always opted out? KOLKHORST:iiRight. Representative Howard, I just want to say that the importance of––the reason I m ’ going to vote for your bill, and I appreciate your hard work on this bill, is I think it gives us more protections than we currently have in the ImmTrac system today. It empowers the parents at each and every vaccination to get out of the system, and that s’ what I want to do. As I told you, I wasn t’ even cognizant of if my children were in the ImmTrac system. I will now know every time I take a vaccination. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. HB 772, as amended, was passed by (Record 452): 99 Yeas, 47 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Ashby; Aycock; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burnam; Callegari; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Crownover; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Geren; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, S.; King, T.; Kolkhorst; Kuempel; Larson; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Patrick; Perez; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; 2226 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Smith; Stephenson; Strama; Thompson, S.; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zerwas. Nays — Anderson; Bell; Burkett; Button; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Craddick; Creighton; Dale; Darby; Elkins; Fallon; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Goldman; Gonzales; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hilderbran; Hughes; Isaac; King, P.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Krause; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Parker; Perry; Phillips; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Simmons; Simpson; Smithee; Springer; Stickland; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Toth; Turner, E.S.; White; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Giddings; Morrison. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting yes on Record No. 452. I intended to vote no. R. Miller When Record No. 452 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted no. Morrison I was shown voting yes on Record No. 452. I intended to vote no. Riddle REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative Howard moved to print remarks between Representative Kolkhorst and Representative Howard. The motion prevailed. HB 3674 ON THIRD READING (by Mun˜oz, Guillen, and Isaac) HB 3674, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to eligibility of municipalities to participate in the historic courthouse preservation and maintenance programs administered by the Texas Historical Commission. HBi3674 was passed by (Record 453): 85 Yeas, 60 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Aycock; Bohac; Burnam; Callegari; Canales; Carter; Coleman; Collier; Cortez; Crownover; Davis, J.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Geren; Giddings; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, S.; Klick; Kuempel; Larson; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Moody; Mun˜oz; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Patrick; Perez; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2227

Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sheffield, J.; Smith; Stephenson; Strama; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zerwas. Nays — Anderson; Ashby; Bell; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Button; Capriglione; Clardy; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Dale; Darby; Davis, S.; Elkins; Fallon; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Goldman; Gonzales; Gooden; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hughes; King, P.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Kolkhorst; Krause; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Morrison; Murphy; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Perry; Phillips; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smithee; Springer; Stickland; Taylor; Toth; Turner, E.S.; Villalba; Villarreal; White; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Lewis; Raney; Riddle. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 453. I intended to vote yes. Cook I was shown voting yes on Record No. 453. I intended to vote no. J. Sheffield I was shown voting yes on Record No. 453. I intended to vote no. E. Thompson I was shown voting no on Record No. 453. I intended to vote yes. Villarreal HB 3640 ON THIRD READING (by Pitts) HB 3640, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the creation of an extension center of the Texas State Technical College System. HBi3640 was passed by (Record 454): 142 Yeas, 5 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; 2228 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, S.; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zerwas. Nays — Flynn; Laubenberg; Stickland; Thompson, E.; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Toth. STATEMENT OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 454. I intended to vote yes. Flynn HB 316 ON THIRD READING (by Otto and Guillen) HB 316, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the pilot program authorizing a property owner to appeal to the State Office of Administrative Hearings regarding certain appraisal review board determinations. HBi316 was passed by (Record 455): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2229

HB 1047 ON THIRD READING (by Sheets) HB 1047, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the regulation of certain surety companies. HB 1047 - STATEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT REPRESENTATIVE S. THOMPSON:iiWhat is the purpose of this bill? REPRESENTATIVE SHEETS:iiTo codify the current and past accounting practice of surety insurance companies writing bail bonds. Currently, this accounting practice, according to recent review by the Texas Department of Insurance, is not clearly defined in the Texas Insurance Code. This bill provides the needed Texas Department of Insurance clarification and removes ambiguity. The bill requires surety insurance companies to record the amount of money they actually receive, or are due, from a bail agent as premium in their financial records, and requires premium taxes to be paid on these premiums. As bail premium is fully earned when written, the bill also clarifies the long standing accounting position of no unearned premium reserve being required to be recorded on this business. S. THOMPSON:iiWhy is it important to codify the past accounting practices in HBi1047 and to continue that practice until such time as the bill passes with an effective date? SHEETS:iiBecause of recent ambiguities raised by the Texas Department of Insurance, the Texas Department of Insurance has issued "permitted practice letters" to certain surety insurance companies allowing them to follow the accounting practices outlined in this bill. Permitted practice letters can be revoked at any time by the TDI. This bill provides clarification and certainty to surety insurance companies writing bail and for the Texas Department of Insurance in its regulatory capacity. Codifying the past accounting practice in HBi1047 and continuing the practice until such time as the bill passes with an effective date will ensure consistency within the financial records of surety insurance companies writing bail and consistency for the Texas Department of Insurance. It also establishes the legislature s’ intent that surety insurance companies not be unfairly taxed on the premiums in past years based on the application of accounting practices not spelled out in the permitted practice letter or this bill. REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative S.iThompson moved to print remarks between Representative Sheets and Representative S.iThompson. The motion prevailed. HB 1047 was passed by (Record 456): 146 Yeas, 0 Nays, 4 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; 2230 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C); Canales; Miles. MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE A message from the senate was received at this time (see the addendum to the daily journal, Messages from the Senate, Message No. 2). HB 1759 ON THIRD READING (by Hunter, Herrero, Martinez Fischer, and Cook) HB 1759, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to a correction, clarification, or retraction of incorrect information published. HBi1759 was passed by (Record 457): 145 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2231

Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Deshotel; Gutierrez; Rodriguez, E. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 457 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Deshotel HB 2414 ON THIRD READING (by Button, Capriglione, Harper-Brown, Coleman, Elkins, et al.) HB 2414, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to requirements for open meetings held by videoconference call. HBi2414 was passed by (Record 458): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Dutton. HB 2918 ON THIRD READING (by S. Thompson) HB 2918, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to statutory durable powers of attorney. HBi2918 was passed by (Record 459): 146 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. 2232 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Sheets; Simmons. STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 459 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Sheets When Record No. 459 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Simmons HB 3116 ON THIRD READING (by Cook) HB 3116, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the recovery of uniform statewide accounting project costs from state agencies and vendors. HBi3116 was passed by (Record 460): 146 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2233

Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Elkins; Hughes. HB 3831 ON THIRD READING (by Herrero and Hunter) HB 3831, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the designation of a portion of State Highway 358 as the Peace Officers Memorial Highway. HBi3831 was passed by (Record 461): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). HB 3355 ON THIRD READING (by Cook) HB 3355, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to cable operators ’ attachments on distribution poles owned or controlled by electric cooperatives. HBi3355 was passed by (Record 462): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. 2234 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). HB 2585 ON THIRD READING (by Harper-Brown, et al.) HB 2585, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the reimbursement of utilities for relocation of utility facilities following improvement or construction of certain tolled highways. HBi2585 was passed by (Record 463): 131 Yeas, 16 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Ma´ rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Paddie; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2235

Nays — Alvarado; Anchia; Elkins; Frank; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Hernandez Luna; Hilderbran; Lucio; Orr; Otto; Phillips; Pickett; Strama; Taylor; Turner, C. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Parker. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting no on Record No. 463. I intended to vote yes. Alvarado I was shown voting no on Record No. 463. I intended to vote yes. Anchia I was shown voting yes on Record No. 463. I intended to vote no. Creighton I was shown voting yes on Record No. 463. I intended to vote no. Dutton I was shown voting no on Record No. 463. I intended to vote no. Hilderbran I was shown voting no on Record No. 463. I intended to vote yes. Lucio When Record No. 463 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Parker I was shown voting yes on Record No. 463. I intended to vote no. Walle HB 800 ON THIRD READING (by Murphy, Alvarado, Hilderbran, Button, E. Rodriguez, et al.) HB 800, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to a sales and use tax exemption and a franchise tax credit related to certain research and development activities. HBi800 was passed by (Record 464): 146 Yeas, 1 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; 2236 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Simpson. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Orr. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 464 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Orr HB 1376 ON THIRD READING (by Kolkhorst) HB 1376, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to advertising by certain facilities that provide emergency services. HBi1376 was passed by (Record 465): 147 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2237

Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Bonnen, D.(C). Absent — Dale. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 465 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted yes. Dale (Ritter in the chair) HB 955 ON THIRD READING (by Isaac and Guillen) HB 955, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the penalty for the offense of reckless driving. HBi955 was passed by (Record 466): 145 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ritter(C). Absent — Aycock; Hughes; Martinez Fischer. STATEMENT OF VOTE When Record No. 466 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Martinez Fischer 2238 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

HB 124 ON THIRD READING (by Anderson, Stephenson, Price, Flynn, et al.) HB 124, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the addition of Salvia divinorum and its derivatives and extracts to Penalty Group 3 of the Texas Controlled Substances Act. HB 124 - REMARKS REPRESENTATIVE SIMPSON:iiI m ’ going to be brief here. We had some discussion on this bill yesterday, but this bill will criminalize a plant, and in 1 Timothy 4:4, God said there that all things that God created are good. I think what we should be doing here is punishing the wrongdoer, and if you use something, and neglect it, and do something wrong then we should punish them, but we should not be making a felony out of just possessing a plant. And some people do use this plant as extract and things medicinally. The Harvard Medical School stated that salvia could reduce dependence upon stimulants. The National Institute of Mental Health s’ Psychoactive Drug Screening Program said that salvia could be useful for a range of diseases including Alzheimer s’ , depression, schizophrenia, chronic pain, or even AIDS or HIV. And there are some who do use this plant religiously, and though I differ with them, I believe it s’ my duty to protect their right to worship as they please and according to their conscience, as long as they r’e not harming someone else. It s’ been said that this drug causes lots of problems, it s’ hallucinogenic. The effect is for about 10 minutes, and it s’ akin to having a daydream. And I think we make a mistake in going ahead and making this a part of the Schedule III drugs that are prohibited when the FDA has not added it to the list. So I urge you not to extend the war on drugs, which has been a real failure in many ways. Thank you for your consideration. I urge you to vote against the bill. HBi124 was passed by (Record 467): 129 Yeas, 17 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Button; Callegari; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Huberty; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Rodriguez, J.; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Zedler; Zerwas. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2239

Nays — Burnam; Canales; Deshotel; Frank; Gooden; Hilderbran; Howard; Hughes; Miles; Neva´rez; Rodriguez, E.; Rose; Schaefer; Simpson; Stickland; Villarreal; Wu. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ritter(C). Absent — Gonza´lez, M.; Sanford. STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 467 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted present, not voting. M. Gonza´lez I was shown voting no on Record No. 467. I intended to vote yes. Hilderbran I was shown voting no on Record No. 467. I intended to vote yes. Miles HB 1337 ON THIRD READING (by D. Bonnen, Riddle, et al.) HB 1337, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the frequency with which the Board of Pardons and Paroles considers the eligibility of certain inmates for release on parole. Amendment No. 1 Representative Toth offered the following amendment to HBi1337: Amend HBi1337 (second reading engrossment) on third reading in SECTION 1 of the bill, as added by Amendment No. 1 by Toth, as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 5, strike "Subsections (b) and (e)" and substitute "Subsections (b), (c), and (e)". (2)iiOn page 1, line 9, strike "consideration" and substitute "proceedings [consideration]". (3)iiStrike all of the language appearing on page 1, line 16, through page 2, line 16, and substitute the following: (b-1)iiRegardless of whether a victim, guardian of a victim, or close relative of a deceased victim provided a victim impact statement or indicated on the statement that the person did or did not wish to be notified of parole proceedings concerning an inmate, the victim, guardian, or close relative may at any time file with the division a written statement indicating that the person: (1)iieternally protests the release of the inmate under any circumstance and urges the protest to be considered in any parole proceeding concerning the inmate; and (2)iiwith respect to notification of parole proceedings concerning the inmate: (A)iiwishes to be notified of any parole proceedings by the division; (B)iiwishes to be notified only after a parole panel orders the release of the inmate; or 2240 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

(C)iidoes not wish to be notified at any time, including after a parole panel orders the release of the inmate. (b-2)iiA victim, guardian of a victim, or close relative of a deceased victim who files a statement with the division under Subsection (b-1) may at any time on written notice to the division: (1)iiwithdraw the person s’ protest under Subsection (b-1)(1); or (2)iiindicate a change in the circumstances under which the person wishes to be notified under Subsection (b-1)(2). (c)iiIf the notice is sent to a guardian or close relative of a deceased victim, the notice must contain a request by the division that the guardian or relative inform other persons having an interest in the matter that the inmate is the subject of a parole proceeding [being considered for release on parole]. (e)iiBefore an inmate is released from the institutional division on parole or to mandatory supervision, the pardons and paroles division shall give notice of the release to a person entitled to notification of parole proceedings concerning [consideration for] the inmate under Subsection (a) or (b), unless: (1)iithe person has filed with the division a written statement described by Subsection (b-1)(2)(C) and has not withdrawn that statement; or (2)iithe parole panel ordering the release of the inmate determines that, nothwithstanding a written statement described by Subsection (b-1)(2)(C), notification is necessary to the person s’ safety. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. HB 1337, as amended, was passed by (Record 468): 148 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Canales; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Fallon; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Gooden; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Ma´rquez; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Perry; Phillips; Pickett; Pitts; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Turner, S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ritter(C). Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2241

(Speaker in the chair) COMMITTEE GRANTED PERMISSION TO MEET Representative Hunter requested permission for the Committee on Calendars to meet while the house is in session, at 3:30ip.m. today, in 3W.9, to set a calendar. Permission to meet was granted. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: Calendars, 3:30ip.m. today, 3W.9, for a formal meeting, to set a calendar. POSTPONED BUSINESS The following bills were laid before the house as postponed business: CSHB 318 ON SECOND READING (by Giddings) CSHB 318, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to employer access to the personal accounts of certain employees and job applicants through electronic communication devices; establishing an unlawful employment practice. CSHB 318 was read second time on Mayi1, an amendment was offered and disposed of, and CSHBi318 was postponed until 4ia.m. today. Amendment No. 2 Representative Giddings offered the following amendment to CSHBi318: Amend CSHBi318 as follows: 1)iiIn SECTIONi1 of the bill, strike subsectioni(a) (pagei1, linesi8 through 16) and substitute the following: Sec.i21.0605.iiREQUIRING OR REQUESTING PERSONAL ACCOUNT ACCESS. (a)iiIn this section, "electronic communication device" includes a computer, telephone, personal digital assistant, or similar device that uses electronic signals to create, transmit, and receive information. 2)iiIn SECTIONi1 of the bill, strike subsectioni(b) (pagei1, linesi17 through 22) and substitute the following: (b)iiAn employer, other than a state or local law enforcement agency, commits an unlawful employment practice if the employer requires or requests that an employee or applicant for employment disclose a user name, password, or other means for accessing a personal account of the employee or applicant, including a personal e-mail account or a social networking website account or profile, through an electronic communication device. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Amendment No. 3 Representative Giddings offered the following amendment to CSHBi318: Amend CSHBi318 as follows: 2242 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

1)iiIn SECTIONi1 of the bill, strike subsectioni(c) (pagei1, linei23 through pagei2, line 15) and substitute the following: (c)iiThis section does not prohibit an employer from: (1)iimaintaining lawful workplace policies governing: (A)iiemployee usage of employer-provided electronic communication devices, including employee access to personal accounts on those devices; or (B)iiemployee usage of personal electronic communication devices during working hours; (2)iimonitoring employee usage of employer-provided electronic communication devices or employer-provided e-mail accounts; or (3)iiobtaining information about an employee or applicant for employment that is in the public domain or that is otherwise lawfully obtained. 2)iiIn SECTIONi1 of the bill, strike subsectioni(d) (pagei2, linesi16 through 17) and substitute the following: (d)iiThis section does not apply to a personal social media account or an electronic communication device of a financial services employee who uses the account or device to conduct business of the employer that is subject to the content, supervision, and retention requirements imposed by federal securities laws and regulations or by a self-regulatory organization, as defined by Sectioni3(a)(26), Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15iU.S.C. Sectioni78c). 3)iiIn SECTIONi1 of the bill, strike subsectioni(e) through subsectioni(g) (pagei2, linesi18 through pagei3, linei23). Amendment No. 3 was adopted. LEAVES OF ABSENCE GRANTED The following members were granted leaves of absence temporarily for today to attend a committee meeting: Branch on motion of Raymond. Button on motion of Raymond. Cook on motion of Raymond. Crownover on motion of Raymond. S. Davis on motion of Raymond. Eiland on motion of Bohac. Frullo on motion of Raymond. Geren on motion of Raymond. Hunter on motion of Raymond. Kuempel on motion of Raymond. D. Miller on motion of Raymond. CSHB 318 - (consideration continued) (R. Sheffield in the chair) Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2243

Representative Giddings moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi318 until 3:50ip.m. today. The motion prevailed. CSHB 866 ON SECOND READING (by Huberty, S. Turner, Cook, Miles, et al.) CSHB 866, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the administration to public school students in certain grades of state-administered assessment instruments. CSHB 866 was read second time on Mayi1 and was postponed until 8ia.m. today. Amendment No. 1 Representative Huberty offered the following amendment to CSHBi866: Amend CSHBi866 (house committee report) as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 20, strike "and". (2)iiStrike page 1, line 23 through page 2, line 2, and substituting the following: [(4)]iisocial studies, in grade eight; and (4)i[(5)]iiscience, in grades five and eight[; and [(6) any other subject and grade required by federal law]. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Huberty offered the following amendment to CSHBi866: Amend CSHBi866 (house committee report) on pagei9, by striking linesi10-16 and substituting the following: SECTIONi2.ii(a) This Act takes effect on any date not later Septemberi1, 2015, on which the commissioner of education: (1)iiobtains any necessary waiver from the application of federal law or regulation conflicting with Sectioni39.023, Education Code, as amended by this Act, as required by Sectioni39.023(a-9), Education Code, as added by this Act; or (2)iireceives written notification from the United States Department of Education that a waiver is not required. (b)iiThis Act applies beginning with the first school year that begins after the date on which this Act takes effect under Subsection (a) of this section. (c)iiIf the commissioner of education obtains any necessary waiver or receives written notification as described by Subsectioni(a) of this section, the commissioner shall certify that the commissioner has obtained the waiver or received notification that a waiver is not required, as applicable, and shall publish notice of that fact in the Texas Register as soon as practicable after obtaining the waiver or receiving notification. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. CSHB 866, as amended, was passed to engrossment. 2244 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

(Branch, Button, Cook, Crownover, S. Davis, Eiland, Frullo, Geren, Hunter, Kuempel, and D. Miller now present) CSHB 376 ON SECOND READING (by Strama, Price, Zerwas, N. Gonzalez, Wu, et al.) CSHB 376, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the regulation of child-care providers by the Texas Workforce Commission and local workforce development boards. CSHB 376 was read second time on Mayi1 and was postponed until 10ia.m. today. Representative Strama moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi376 until 4ip.m. today. The motion prevailed. CSHB 3447 ON SECOND READING (by Gutierrez) CSHB 3447, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the establishment and functions of certain urban land bank demonstration programs. CSHB 3447 was read second time on Mayi1 and was postponed until 12ip.m. today. CSHBi3447 was passed to engrossment. (Anderson, Button, Schaefer, and Simpson recorded voting no.) GENERAL STATE CALENDAR HOUSE BILLS SECOND READING The following bills were laid before the house and read second time: CSHB 3201 ON SECOND READING (by Kolkhorst) CSHB 3201, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the practice of dentistry; imposing surcharges and fees. Representative Kolkhorst moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi3201 until 4ip.m. today. The motion prevailed. CSHB 983 ON SECOND READING (by Elkins) CSHB 983, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the eligibility of temporary election officers for unemployment compensation. CSHBi983 was passed to engrossment. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2245

HB 985 ON SECOND READING (by Elkins) HB 985, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the deadlines by which provisional ballots must be processed and the state canvass must be conducted for certain elections. HBi985 was passed to engrossment. LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED The following member was granted leave of absence for the remainder of today to attend a meeting of the Conference Committee on SBi1: Pitts on motion of Geren. MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE A message from the senate was received at this time (see the addendum to the daily journal, Messages from the Senate, Message No. 3). CSHB 1010 ON SECOND READING (by S. King) CSHB 1010, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the penalty for causing certain assaultive physical contact with a child. Representative S. King moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi1010 until 4:45ip.m. today. The motion prevailed. CSHB 1081 ON SECOND READING (by M. Gonza´lez and Neva´rez) CSHB 1081, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to a study regarding the prohibition of dairy farming in certain areas of the state. Amendment No. 1 Representative M. Gonza´ lez offered the following amendment to CSHBi1081: Amend CSHBi1081 by striking page 1, line 22, through page 2, line 1, and renumbering the subsequent subdivisions of SECTION 1(c) of the bill accordingly. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CSHB 1081, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Simpson recorded voting no.) CSHB 1324 ON SECOND READING (by J. Davis, et al.) CSHB 1324, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to exclusion of land from certain water districts that fail to provide service to the land; clarifying and limiting the authority of those districts with outstanding bonds payable from ad valorem taxes to impose taxes on excluded land. 2246 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

CSHBi1324 was passed to engrossment. (Ma´rquez in the chair) CSHB 585 ON SECOND READING (by Villarreal, Workman, and P. King) CSHB 585, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to ad valorem taxation; creating an offense. Representative Otto moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi585 until 4:30ip.m. today. The motion prevailed. SB 1546 ON SECOND READING (Guillen - House Sponsor) SB 1546, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the management and use of the Texas preservation trust fund. SB 1546 was considered in lieu of HB 3651. Amendment No. 1 Representative Orr offered the following amendment to SBi1546: Amend SBi1546 (house committee printing) on page 3 of the bill as follows: (1)iiOn line 8, strike "increase" and substitute "make". (2)iiOn line 11, strike "seven" and substitute "six". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. SB 1546, as amended, was passed to third reading. HB 3651 - LAID ON THE TABLE SUBJECT TO CALL Representative Guillen moved to lay HBi3651 on the table subject to call. The motion prevailed. POSTPONED BUSINESS The following bills were laid before the house as postponed business: CSHB 318 ON SECOND READING (by Giddings) CSHB 318, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to employer access to the personal accounts of certain employees and job applicants through electronic communication devices; establishing an unlawful employment practice. CSHB 318 was read second time on Mayi1, an amendment was offered and disposed of, and CSHBi318 was postponed until 4ia.m. today. CSHBi318 was laid before the house as postponed business earlier today, was further amended, and was again postponed until this time. Amendment No. 4 Representative Kleinschmidt offered the following amendment to CSHBi318: Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2247

Amend CSHBi318 (house committee printing), as follows: (1)iiAdd the following appropriately lettered subsection to Section 21.0605, Labor Code: (iiii) This section does apply if an employer and an employee of the employer have entered into a contractual agreement under which the employee consents to the disclosure of a user name, password, or other means of accessing a personal account of the employee through an electronic communication device. Amendment No. 4 was adopted. COMMITTEE GRANTED PERMISSION TO MEET Representative Keffer requested permission for the Committee on Energy Resources to meet while the house is in session, at 4:30ip.m. today, in 3W.9, to consider HBi2590, HBi3168, and HBi3597. Permission to meet was granted. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: Energy Resources, 4:30ip.m. today, 3W.9, for a formal meeting, to consider HBi2590, HBi3168, and HBi3597. CSHB 318 - (consideration continued) CSHB 318 - REMARKS REPRESENTATIVE WU:iiMembers, let me clarify a few things. First of all, we need to make an important distinction between communications that are personal and communications that are business. They are separate. If you go to work for a large company, that company may give you a computer at your desk—that is the company ’s computer. They may give you a cell phone to use for your business—that is a company cell phone. They may give you an e-mail account to use to conduct company business—that is the company s’ e-mail. But, even still, you have your own personal cell phone, your own personal computer at home, your own personal e-mail account, okay? What this bill is saying is, we are protecting your personal phone, your personal computer, and your personal e-mail—not the company s’ . The company always has access to their own systems. A company always has access to their own machines and their own devices—we don t’ need a law to do that. What we are protecting here—what we are setting as an example today is to make sure that our private accounts are protected. In the age of continuing advancement in social media and technology, this is an important first step. But even libertarian concerns aside, civil liberties concerns aside, there is an important, let s’ say, criminal concern. One of the basic things is, Texas provides higher evidentiary collection standards than the federal government. Representative Toth talked about the 4thiAmendment—the 4thiAmendment of the Constitution of the United States provides a baseline which no state may slip under. However, each state may provide higher protections than what the Constitution provides, and Texas is one of those states that actually provides higher standards than what the U.S. Constitution provides. In Texas, the law says 2248 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

if an officer violates your civil rights in collecting evidence, that evidence is out. The federal U.S. Constitution says the same thing. However, in Texas, the protections in the state also say, look, we don t’ care if it s’ an officer or a private individual. If a private individual, on their own, goes and digs for information and violates someone else s’ civil rights, that evidence is also out. They may not go dig for themselves and hand it to the police. Our Texas Constitution provides a higher standard of protection. This is the concern—if an employer is able to access someone s’ personal e-mail, violating that person s’ rights, and then, they discover some stuff that is unrelated business, that maybe links that person to a crime, if they hand that evidence over to the police, and the police investigate, and the police finds further evidence, all of that evidence is now out. This law tries to prevent those types of situations from happening, saying, look, if you r’e an employer, and you think your employee is committing a crime against you and you want to get into their personal e-mail account, call an officer. The officer will call a DA. The DA will draft a warrant, and they will get it correctly to make sure the evidence is properly admissible. REPRESENTATIVE TOTH:iiGene, you v’ e served as a district attorney, haven t’ you? WU:iiI served as an assistant district attorney. TOTH:iiSo, you prosecuted cases, correct? WU:iiYes, sir. TOTH:iiIf a corporation went on a hunting expedition and violated someone s’ 4thiAmendment rights, could that potentially destroy the case? WU:iiIt potentially could, because if a court decided that evidence was gathered in violation of either the U.S. Constitution or the Texas Constitution, that evidence would most likely be excluded. TOTH:iiSo, the Villalba amendment could actually destroy a case? WU:iiIt s’ possible. TOTH:iiIt could actually have unintended consequences work against it? WU:iiIf that s’ what a court decides, and I m ’ saying that there is a distinct possibility of that. CSHB 318, as amended, was passed to engrossment by (Record 469): 79 Yeas, 61 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anderson; Bohac; Branch; Burkett; Canales; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Cortez; Creighton; Crownover; Davis, J.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Eiland; Elkins; Farias; Farrar; Fletcher; Frank; Giddings; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Hunter; King, S.; King, T.; Kleinschmidt; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Miller, R.; Moody; Mun˜oz; Naishtat; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2249

Oliveira; Orr; Otto; Patrick; Perez; Pickett; Ratliff; Raymond; Reynolds; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Rose; Sheets; Smithee; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Workman; Wu; Zedler; Zerwas. Nays — Anchia; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Button; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Craddick; Dale; Darby; Davis, S.; Fallon; Farney; Flynn; Frullo; Geren; Goldman; Gonzales; Gooden; Hilderbran; Isaac; Kacal; Keffer; King, K.; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Miller, D.; Murphy; Neva´rez; Paddie; Parker; Perry; Phillips; Price; Raney; Rodriguez, J.; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smith; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Strama; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Turner, E.S.; Villalba; White. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ma´rquez(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Pitts. Absent — Burnam; Callegari; Hughes; Johnson; King, P.; Laubenberg; Morrison. STATEMENTS OF VOTE I was shown voting yes on Record No. 469. I intended to vote no. Anderson When Record No. 469 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted yes. Burnam I was shown voting yes on Record No. 469. I intended to vote no. Creighton I was shown voting no on Record No. 469. I intended to vote yes. J. Rodriguez CSHB 376 ON SECOND READING (by Strama, Price, Zerwas, N. Gonzalez, Wu, et al.) CSHB 376, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the regulation of child-care providers by the Texas Workforce Commission and local workforce development boards. CSHB 376 was read second time on Mayi1, postponed until 10ia.m. today, and was again postponed untilithis time. Amendment No. 1 Representative Y. Davis offered the following amendment to CSHBi376: Amend CSHBi376, on pagei5, at the end of linei20, by inserting "A board shall give priority to quality child care initiatives that benefit child care facilities that are working toward Texas Rising Star certification or are Texas Rising Star certified providers working toward a higher certification level.". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. 2250 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

CSHB 376, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Phillips recorded voting no.) CSHB 3201 ON SECOND READING (by Kolkhorst) CSHB 3201, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the practice of dentistry; imposing surcharges and fees. CSHB 3201 was read second time earlier today and was postponed until this time. Amendment No. 1 Representative Kolkhorst offered the following amendment to CSHBi3201: Amend CSHBi3201 (house committee printing) as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 7, strike "$80" and substitute "$55". (2)iiOn page 1, line 9, between "a" and "license", insert "dental". (3)iiOn page 1, line 10, between "a" and "license", insert "dental". (4)iiOn page 2, line 6, strike "45th" and substitute "60th". (5)iiOn page 3, line 2, strike "may" and substitute "shall". (6)iiOn page 8, between lines 9 and 10, add the following appropriately numbered SECTION to the bill and renumber subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSection 254.004(c), Occupations Code, as added by this Act, applies only to an application for an original dental license or for renewal of a dental license filed on or after September 1, 2013. An application filed before September 1, 2013, is governed by the law in effect immediately before that date, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose. (7)iiOn page 8, line 20, strike "takes" and substitute "and Sections 254.004(c) and (d), Occupations Code, as added by this Act, take". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Kolkhorst offered the following amendment to CSHBi3201: Amend CSHBi3201 (house committee printing) by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTIONS to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill and references to those sections accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter B, Chapter 258, Occupations Code, is amended by adding Section 258.055 to read as follows: Sec.i258.055.iiPRACTICE OF DENTISTRY ON CERTAIN CHILDREN. (a) The parent or guardian of a child younger than 18 years of age may be present in the treatment room during the child s’ dental treatment or procedure, unless the dentist determines in the dentist s’ professional judgment that the presence of the parent or guardian in the treatment room is likely to have an adverse effect on the treatment or the child. (b)iiIn this section, "parent or guardian" includes a person authorized by law to consent for the medical or dental treatment of a child younger than 18 years of age. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2251

SECTIONi____.ii(a) The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners shall collect the following information from dentists licensed by the board in conjunction with the first annual license renewal of each dental license that occurs after September 1, 2013: (1)iithe number and type of dentists employed by the license holder, if any; (2)iithe name under which the license holder provides dental services and each location at which those services are provided by that license holder; (3)iiwhether the license holder is a participating provider under the Medicaid program operated under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code, or the child health plan program operated under Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code; (4)iiwhether the license holder is employed by or contracts with a dental group practice and, if so, the name and address of the dental group practice; (5)iiwhether the license holder owns a dental group practice and, if so, the name and address of the dental group practice and of each dental office at which the dental group practice provides services to patients; (6)iiwhether the license holder is a party to a business support services agreement and, if so, the name and address of the management service organization that provides services under the agreement; and (7)iiif the license holder owns a dental group practice, whether that practice is a party to a business support services agreement and, if so, the name and address of the management service organization that provides services under the agreement. (b)iiNot later than November 1, 2014, the board shall provide a report to the legislature on the information collected under this section and on the board s’ use of the information in the exercise of the board s’ statutory authority to regulate the practice of dentistry. (c)iiThis section expires December 1, 2014. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Amendment No. 3 Representative Fletcher offered the following amendment to CSHBi3201: Amend CSHBi3201 (house committee printing) by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTION to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill and references to those sections accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSection 254.018, Occupations Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec.i254.018.ii[EXPERT] TESTIMONY. A member of the board may not express an oral or written opinion or serve as an expert witness in a suit involving a health care liability claim against a person licensed or registered under this subtitle [dentist] for injury to or death of a patient or for a violation of the standard of care or the commission of malpractice [unless the member receives approval from the board or an executive committee of the board to serve as an expert witness]. 2252 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Amendment No. 3 was adopted. (The vote was reconsidered later today, and Amendment No. 3 was amended and was adopted, as amended.) CSHB 3201, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Springer recorded voting no.) (The vote was reconsidered later today, and CSHB 3201 was further amended and was passed to engrossment, as amended.) CSHB 205 ON SECOND READING (by McClendon, Kolkhorst, Burkett, J. Davis, Rose, et al.) CSHB 205, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the allocation of outpatient mental health services and beds in certain mental health facilities and the commitment of certain persons to receive mental health services. Amendment No. 1 Representative Mene´ndez offered the following amendment to CSHBi205: Amend CSHBi205 (house committee printing) by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTIONS to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter B, Chapter 32, Human Resources Code, is amended by adding Section 32.0264 to read as follows: Sec.i32.0264.iiSUSPENSION, TERMINATION, AND AUTOMATIC REINSTATEMENT OF ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PERSONS CONFINED IN COUNTY JAILS. (a)iiIn this section, "county jail" means a facility operated by or for a county for the confinement of persons accused or convicted of an offense. (b)iiIf a person with mental illness is confined in a county jail, the department shall suspend the person s’ eligibility for medical assistance during the period the person is confined in the county jail if: (1)iithe person has been charged with but not convicted of an offense; and (2)iithe department has reason to believe that the person: (A)iiafter release or discharge from the county jail, will be admitted to a state hospital for emergency detention under Chapter 573, Health and Safety Code, or ordered by a court under Chapter 574, Health and Safety Code, to receive inpatient mental health services at a state hospital; or (B)iiwill be committed to a state hospital to attain competency to stand trial under Chapter 46B, Code of Criminal Procedure, or to receive inpatient mental health services following an acquittal by reason of insanity under Chapter 46C, Code of Criminal Procedure. (c)iiIf a person with mental illness is confined in a county jail, the department shall, as appropriate, terminate the person s’ eligibility for medical assistance or suspend the person s’ eligibility during the period the person is confined in the county jail if: (1)iithe person has been convicted of an offense; and Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2253

(2)iithe department has reason to believe that the person, after release or discharge from the county jail, will be admitted to a state hospital for emergency detention under Chapter 573, Health and Safety Code, or ordered by a court under Chapter 574, Health and Safety Code, to receive inpatient mental health services at a state hospital. (d)iiNot later than 48 hours after the department is notified of the release from a county jail of a person whose eligibility for medical assistance has been suspended under this section, the department shall reinstate the person s’ eligibility, provided the person s’ eligibility certification period has not elapsed. Following the reinstatement, the person remains eligible until the expiration of the period for which the person was certified as eligible. SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter C, Chapter 351, Local Government Code, is amended by adding Section 351.048 to read as follows: Sec.i351.048.iiNOTICE TO CERTAIN GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. (a) The sheriff of a county may notify the Health and Human Services Commission: (1)iion the confinement in the county jail of a person with mental illness who: (A)iiis receiving medical assistance benefits under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code; and (B)iithe sheriff has reason to believe would qualify for a suspension of those benefits under Section 32.0264(b), Human Resources Code; and (2)iion the conviction of a prisoner with mental illness who: (A)iiimmediately before the prisoner s’ confinement in the county jail, was receiving medical assistance benefits; and (B)iithe sheriff has reason to believe would qualify for a suspension of those benefits under Section 32.0264(c), Human Resources Code. (b)iiIf the sheriff of a county chooses to provide the notices described by Subsection (a), the sheriff shall provide the notices electronically or by other appropriate means as soon as possible and not later than the 30th day after the date of the person s’ confinement or prisoner s’ conviction, as applicable. (c)iiThe sheriff of a county may notify: (1)iithe United States Social Security Administration of the release or discharge of a prisoner with mental illness: (A)iiwho immediately before the prisoner s’ confinement in the county jail, was receiving: (i)iiSupplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under 42 U.S.C. Section 1381 et seq.; or (ii)iiSocial Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits under 42 U.S.C. Section 401 et seq.; and (B)iiwho: (i)iihas been committed to a state hospital to attain competency to stand trial under Chapter 46B, Code of Criminal Procedure, or to receive inpatient mental health services following an acquittal by reason of insanity under Chapter 46C, Code of Criminal Procedure; or 2254 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

(ii)iithe sheriff has reason to believe will be admitted to a state hospital for emergency detention under Chapter 573, Health and Safety Code, or ordered by a court under Chapter 574, Health and Safety Code, to receive inpatient mental health services at a state hospital; and (2)iithe Health and Human Services Commission of the release or discharge of a prisoner with mental illness who, immediately before the prisoner s’ confinement in the county jail, was receiving medical assistance benefits and who: (A)iihas been committed to a state hospital to attain competency to stand trial under Chapter 46B, Code of Criminal Procedure, or to receive inpatient mental health services following an acquittal by reason of insanity under Chapter 46C, Code of Criminal Procedure; or (B)iithe sheriff has reason to believe will be admitted to a state hospital for emergency detention under Chapter 573, Health and Safety Code, or ordered by a court under Chapter 574, Health and Safety Code, to receive inpatient mental health services at a state hospital. (d)iiIf the sheriff of a county chooses to provide the notices described by Subsection (c), the sheriff shall provide the notices electronically or by other appropriate means not later than 48 hours after the prisoner s’ release or discharge from custody. (e)iiIf the sheriff of a county chooses to provide the notices described by Subsection (c), at the time of the prisoner s’ release or discharge, the sheriff shall provide the prisoner with a written copy of each applicable notice and a phone number at which the prisoner may contact the Health and Human Services Commission regarding confirmation of or assistance relating to reinstatement of the person s’ eligibility for medical assistance benefits, if applicable. (f)iiThe Health and Human Services Commission shall establish a means by which the sheriff of a county, or an employee of the county or sheriff, may determine whether a person confined in the county jail is or was, as appropriate, receiving medical assistance benefits under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code, for purposes of this section. (g)iiThe county or sheriff, or an employee of the county or sheriff, is not liable in a civil action for damages resulting from a failure to comply with this section. SECTIONi____.iiSections 32.0264(a)-(c), Human Resources Code, and Section 351.048(a), Local Government Code, as added by this Act, apply to a person whose period of confinement in a county jail begins on or after the effective date of this Act, regardless of the date the person was determined eligible for medical assistance under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code. SECTIONi____.iiSection 32.0264(d), Human Resources Code, and Section 351.048(c), Local Government Code, as added by this Act, apply to the release or discharge of a prisoner from a county jail that occurs on or after the effective date of this Act, regardless of the date the prisoner was initially confined in the county jail. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2255

SECTIONi____.iiIf before implementing any provision of this Act a state agency determines that a waiver or authorization from a federal agency is necessary for implementation of that provision, the agency affected by the provision shall request the waiver or authorization and may delay implementing that provision until the waiver or authorization is granted. Amendment No. 1 failed of adoption. CSHB 205 was passed to engrossment. CSHB 439 ON SECOND READING (by Dutton) CSHB 439, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the restoration of certain rights to a criminal defendant. Amendment No. 1 Representative Dutton offered the following amendment to CSHBi439: Amend CSHBi439 (house committee printing) on page 1 by striking lines 22 through 24 and substituting the following: (i)iifor which an individual is required to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62; (ii)iiinvolving violence or the threat of violence; (iii)iiinvolving drugs; or (iv)iiinvolving firearms and punishable as a felony. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CSHB 439, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Anderson, Button, Flynn, Phillips, Springer, E. S. Turner, and Zedler recorded voting no.) REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative Wu moved to print his remarks on CSHBi318. The motion prevailed. COMMITTEE GRANTED PERMISSION TO MEET Representative Hilderbran requested permission for the Committee on Ways and Means to meet while the house is in session, at 5ip.m. today, in 3W.15, to consider HBi3571 and pending business. Permission to meet was granted. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: Ways and Means, 5 p.m. today, 3W.15, for a formal meeting, to consider HBi3571 and pending business. CSHB 585 ON SECOND READING (by Villarreal, Workman, and P. King) CSHB 585, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to ad valorem taxation; creating an offense. 2256 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

CSHB 585 was read second time earlier today and was postponed until this time. Amendment No. 1 Representative Villarreal offered the following amendment to CSHBi585: Amend CSHBi585 (house committee printing) as follows: (1)iiOn page 6, line 12, strike "Subsections (d-1) and (f)" and substitute "Subsections (d), (d-1), and (f)". (2)iiOn page 6, between lines 13 and 14, insert the following: (d)iiExcept as provided by Subsection (d-1), members of the board are independent contractors of the appraisal district appointed by resolution of a majority of the appraisal district board of directors.iiA vacancy on the board is filled in the same manner for the unexpired portion of the term. (3)iiOn page 6, line 17, between "are" and "appointed", insert "independent contractors of the appraisal district". (4)iiOn page 7, strike lines 1-12 and substitute the following: (f)iiA member of the board serves at the pleasure [may be removed from the board by a majority vote] of the appraisal district board of directors[,] or [by] the local administrative district judge or the judge s’ designee, as applicable, that appointed the member.ii[Grounds for removal are: [(1)iia violation of Section 6.412, 6.413, 41.66(f), or 41.69; or [(2)iigood cause relating to the attendance of members at called meetings of the board as established by written policy adopted by a majority of the appraisal district board of directors.] Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Otto offered the following amendment to CSHBi585: Amend CSHBi585 (house committee printing) by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTION to the bill and renumbering the subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.ii(a) Section 41.43, Tax Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (a-3), (a-4), and (a-5) to read as follows: (a)iiExcept as provided by Subsections (a-1), (a-3), and (d), in a protest authorized by Section 41.41(a)(1) or (2), the appraisal district has the burden of establishing the value of the property by a preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing. If the appraisal district fails to meet that standard, the protest shall be determined in favor of the property owner. (a-3)iiIn a protest authorized by Section 41.41(a)(1) or (2), the appraisal district has the burden of establishing the value of the property by clear and convincing evidence presented at the hearing if: (1)iithe appraised value of the property was lowered under this subtitle in the preceding tax year; (2)iithe appraised value of the property in the preceding tax year was not established as a result of a written agreement between the property owner or the owner s’ agent and the appraisal district under Section 1.111(e); and Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2257

(3)iinot later than the 14th day before the date of the first day of the hearing, the property owner files with the appraisal review board and delivers to the chief appraiser: (A)iiinformation, such as income and expense statements or information regarding comparable sales, that is sufficient to allow for a determination of the appraised or market value of the property if the protest is authorized by Section 41.41(a)(1); or (B)iiinformation that is sufficient to allow for a determination of whether the property was appraised unequally if the protest is authorized by Section 41.41(a)(2). (a-4)iiIf the appraisal district has the burden of establishing the value of property by clear and convincing evidence presented at the hearing on a protest as provided by Subsection (a-3) and the appraisal district fails to meet that standard, the protest shall be determined in favor of the property owner. (a-5)iiSubsection (a-3)(3) does not impose a duty on a property owner to provide any information in a protest authorized by Section 41.41(a)(1) or (2). That subdivision is merely a condition to the applicability of the standard of evidence provided by Subsection (a-3). (b)iiThe change in law made by this section applies only to a protest filed with an appraisal review board on or after the effective date of this section. A protest filed with an appraisal review board before the effective date of this section is covered by the law in effect at the time the protest was filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. (c)iiNotwithstanding any other provision of this Act, this section takes effect September 1, 2013. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. CSHB 585, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Phillips recorded voting no.) GENERAL STATE CALENDAR (consideration continued) CSHB 658 ON SECOND READING (by Sheets and Krause) CSHB 658, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to postjudgment interest on damages subject to Medicare subrogation. CSHBi658 was passed to engrossment. CSHB 1134 ON SECOND READING (by Darby) CSHB 1134, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to performance and payment security for certain comprehensive development agreements. CSHBi1134 was passed to engrossment. 2258 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

SB 567 ON SECOND READING (Geren - House Sponsor) SB 567, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to rates for water service, to the transfer of functions relating to the economic regulation of water and sewer service from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to the Public Utility Commission of Texas, and to the duties of the Office of Public Utility Counsel regarding the economic regulation of water and sewer service. SB 567 was considered in lieu of HB 1307. Amendment No. 1 Representative Geren offered the following amendment to SBi567: Amend SBi567 as follows: (1)iiOn page 62, line 18, between "unless the" and "commission has", insert "utility". (2)iiStrike "Sections 11.041 and 12.013" and substitute "Section 12.013" in the following places: (A)iipage 110, lines 19 and 20; (B)iipage 111, line 20; (C)iipage 111, line 25; (D)iipage 112, line 12; and (E)iipage 114, line 3. (3)iiAdd the following appropriately numbered SECTIONS to the bill and renumber subsequent SECTIONS accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSection 8803.151(1), Special District Local Laws Code, is amended to read as follows: (1)ii"Commission" means the Public Utility Commission of Texas [Commission on Environmental Quality]. SECTIONi____.iiSection 8808.151(1), Special District Local Laws Code, is amended to read as follows: (1)ii"Commission" means the Public Utility Commission of Texas [Commission on Environmental Quality]. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Dutton offered the following amendment to SBi567: Amend SBi567 by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTION to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter G, Chapter 13, Water Code, is amended by adding Section 13.2552 to read as follows: S e c . i 1 3 . 2 5 5 2 . i i S I N G L E C E RT I F I C AT I O N I N P O P U L O U S MUNICIPALITIES. (a) This section applies only to: (1)iia retail public utility that: (A)iiprovides service in a municipality with a population of more than two million; (B)iiprovides service in more than 50 counties in this state; and Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2259

(C)iiobtains water from more than 500 source wells in this state; and (2)iia municipality with a population of more than two million. (b)iiNotwithstanding any other law, a municipality and a retail public utility that provides water or sewer service in the municipality under a certificate of convenience and necessity shall agree in writing that the utility s’ service area in the municipality shall be served only by a municipally owned utility and that the municipality shall purchase from the retail public utility: (1)iithe certificate of convenience and necessity for the area in the municipality; (2)iithe property of the retail public utility; and (3)iiany property of the retail public utility that is rendered useless or valueless as a result of the transfer of the certificate. (c)iiThe minimum monetary compensation the municipality shall pay shall be determined in the manner provided by Sections 13.254(e)-(g-1). The municipality shall pay the compensation over a period of 50 years. (d)iiThe municipality, before providing service to the area, shall file an application with the commission to grant single certification to the municipally owned utility. (e)iiThe executed agreement described by Subsection (b) shall be filed with the commission, and the commission, on receipt of the agreement and the application described by Subsection (d), shall: (1)iiincorporate the terms of the agreement into the respective certificates of convenience and necessity of the parties to the agreement; and (2)iigrant single certification to the municipality. (f)iiThe commission shall deny an application for single certification by a municipality that fails to demonstrate compliance with the commission s’ minimum requirements for public drinking water systems. Amendment No. 2 was withdrawn. SB 567, as amended, was passed to third reading. HB 1307 - LAID ON THE TABLE SUBJECT TO CALL Representative Geren moved to lay HBi1307 on the table subject to call. The motion prevailed. HB 2020 ON SECOND READING (by Crownover, Alvarado, Lucio, Harless, and Callegari) HB 2020, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the adoption of wellness policies and programs by state agencies. Amendment No. 1 Representative S. Davis offered the following amendment to HBi2020: Amend HBi2020 (house committee report) as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 16, between "POLICIES." and "A state", insert "(a)". 2260 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

(2)iiOn page 2, line 8, between "services" and the underlined semicolon, insert "in accordance with Subtitles B and J, Title 3, Occupations Code, including the requirements regarding delegation of certain medical acts under Chapter 157, Occupations Code". (3)iiOn page 2, between lines 10 and 11, insert the following: (b)iiIn addition to the requirements of Sections 2155.074, 2155.075, and 2254.003, in awarding a contract for on-site clinic or pharmacy services as provided by Subsection (a)(5), a state agency may consider: (1)iiwhether the on-site clinic services will be provided by a physician-led organization that has its principal place of business in this state; or (2)iiwhether the on-site pharmacy services will be provided by a business that has its principal place of business in this state. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. HB 2020, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Phillips, Springer, and E. S. Turner recorded voting no.) CSHB 2294 ON SECOND READING (by Kuempel and Lucio) CSHB 2294, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to an exemption from air conditioning and refrigeration contracting regulation for installation of a thermostat. CSHBi2294 was passed to engrossment. CSHB 2962 ON SECOND READING (by Harper-Brown) CSHB 2962, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the use of a credit or charge card by certain state agencies to make certain purchases. Amendment No. 1 Representatives Martinez Fischer, Flynn, Alvarado, and Neva´rez offered the following amendment to CSHBi2962: Amend CSHBi2962 (house committee printing) as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 13, strike "and". (2)iiOn page 1, between lines 13 and 14, insert the following: (2)iirequire a state agency that uses a credit or charge card to make a purchase to post on the agency s’ Internet website a list of all purchases made with the credit or charge card, provided that the agency is not required to post any confidential information; and (3)iiOn page 1, line 14, strike "(2)" and substitute "(3)". (4)iiOn page 2, line 10, strike "and". (5)iiOn page 2, between lines 10 and 11, insert the following: (2)iithe agency shall post on the agency s’ Internet website a list of all purchases made with the credit or charge card, provided that the agency is not required to post any confidential information; and (6)iiOn page 2, line 11, strike "(2)" and substitute "(3)". (7)iiOn page 3, line 1, strike "and". Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2261

(8)iiOn page 3, between lines 1 and 2, insert the following: (2)iithe agency shall post on the agency s’ Internet website a list of all purchases made with the credit or charge card, provided that the agency is not required to post any confidential information; and (9)iiOn page 3, line 2, strike "(2)" and substitute "(3)". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Otto offered the following amendment to CSHBi2962: Amend CSHBi2962 (house committee printing) by adding the following the following appropriately numbered SECTION to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter B, Chapter 403, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 403.0233 to read as follows: Sec.i403.0233.iiCREDIT OR DEBIT CARD AGREEMENT BENEFITTING INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. (a) In this section, "institution of higher education" has the meaning assigned by Section 61.003, Education Code. (b)iiA rule adopted by the comptroller under Section 403.023 may not prohibit an institution of higher education that enters into an agreement with a credit or debit card issuer under which the issuer is required to pay the institution an amount of money based on the use of the credit or debit card by a cardholder from retaining any money paid by the issuer to the institution under the agreement. Amendment No. 2 was withdrawn. CSHB 2962, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Schaefer and Simpson recorded voting no.) CSHB 3460 ON SECOND READING (by Eiland) CSHB 3460, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the requirement that certain information be reported to the Texas Department of Insurance and the confidentiality of that information. CSHBi3460 was passed to engrossment. (Simpson recorded voting no.) HB 194 ON SECOND READING (by Farias, Ratliff, Mene´ndez, Guerra, Collier, et al.) HB 194, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to considering ownership interests of certain disabled veterans in determining whether a business is a historically underutilized business for purposes of state contracting. Representative Farias moved to postpone consideration of HBi194 until 2ip.m. Monday, May 6. The motion prevailed. 2262 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

CSHB 3105 ON SECOND READING (by Morrison) CSHB 3105, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to availability of certain benefits under individual accident and health insurance policies. CSHBi3105 was passed to engrossment. CSHB 3158 ON SECOND READING (by Zerwas, Johnson, and Rose) CSHB 3158, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to Medicaid managed care pilot programs for contracts with provider-directed managed care organizations, including organizations that delegate to health care collaboratives, and to the establishment of those collaboratives. Representative Rose moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi3158 until 8ia.m. tomorrow. The motion prevailed. HB 3436 ON SECOND READING (by Cook) HB 3436, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to formal action of responsible governmental entities on certain proposals or bids for certain projects. Amendment No. 1 Representative Cook offered the following amendment to HBi3436: Amend HBi3436 (house committee report) as follows: (1)iiOn page 1, line 5, between "Government Code," and "is", insert "as added by Chapteri1334 (SBi1048), Acts of the 82nd Legislature, Regular Session, 2011,". (2)iiOn page 1, line 9, strike "Septemberi1, 2013" and substitute "Septemberi1, 2015". (3)iiOn page 1, line 10, strike "Septemberi2, 2013" and substitute "Septemberi2, 2015". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 Representative Cook offered the following amendment to HBi3436: Amend HBi3436 (house committee report) on pagei1, linei5, between "Government Code," and "is", by inserting "as added by Chapteri1334 (SBi1048), Acts of the 82ndiLegislature, Regular Session, 2011,". Amendment No. 2 was adopted. HB 3436, as amended, was passed to engrossment. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2263

CSHB 3572 ON SECOND READING (by Hilderbran, Eiland, Otto, Bohac, Alvarado, et al.) CSHB 3572, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the administration, collection, and enforcement of taxes on mixed beverages; imposing a tax on sales of mixed beverages; decreasing the rate of the current tax on mixed beverages. Representative Hilderbran moved to postpone consideration of CSHBi3572 until the end of today s’ calendar. The motion prevailed. CSHB 3556 ON SECOND READING (by Kolkhorst and Raymond) CSHB 3556, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the licensing and regulation of emergency medical services providers and a moratorium on the issuance of emergency medical services provider licenses. Amendment No. 1 Representative Raymond offered the following amendment to CSHBi3556: Amend CSHBi3556 (house committee report) by adding the following appropriately numbered SECTIONS to the bill and renumbering subsequent SECTIONS of the bill accordingly: SECTIONi____.iiSection 773.0571, Health and Safety Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec.i773.0571.iiREQUIREMENTS FOR PROVIDER LICENSE. The department shall issue to an emergency medical services provider applicant a license that is valid for two years if the department is satisfied that: (1)iithe applicant [emergency medical services provider] has adequate staff to meet the staffing standards prescribed by this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter; (2)iieach emergency medical services vehicle is adequately constructed, equipped, maintained, and operated to render basic or advanced life support services safely and efficiently; (3)iithe applicant [emergency medical services provider] offers safe and efficient services for emergency prehospital care and transportation of patients; [and] (4)iithe applicant: (A)iipossesses sufficient professional experience and qualifications to provide emergency medical services; and (B)iihas not been excluded from participation in the state Medicaid program; (5)iithe applicant holds a letter of approval issued under Section 773.0573 by the governing body of the municipality or the commissioners court of the county in which the applicant is located and is applying to provide emergency medical services, as applicable; and (6)iithe applicant [emergency medical services provider] complies with the rules adopted [by the board] under this chapter. 2264 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

SECTIONi____.iiSubchapter C, Chapter 773, Health and Safety Code, is amended by adding Section 773.0573 to read as follows: S e c . i 7 7 3 . 0 5 7 3 . i i L E T T E R O F A P P R O VA L F R O M L O C A L GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY. (a) An emergency medical services provider applicant must obtain a letter of approval from: (1)iithe governing body of the municipality in which the applicant is located and is applying to provide emergency medical services; or (2)iiif the applicant is not located in a municipality, the commissioners court of the county in which the applicant is located and is applying to provide emergency medical services. (b)iiA governing body of a municipality or a commissioners court of a county may issue a letter of approval to an emergency medical services provider applicant who is applying to provide emergency medical services in the municipality or county only if the governing body or commissioners court determines that: (1)iithe addition of another licensed emergency medical services provider will not interfere with or adversely affect the provision of emergency medical services by the licensed emergency medical services providers operating in the municipality or county; (2)iithe addition of another licensed emergency medical services provider will remedy an existing provider shortage that cannot be resolved through the use of the licensed emergency medical services providers operating in the municipality or county; and (3)iithe addition of another licensed emergency medical services provider will not cause an oversupply of licensed emergency medical services providers in the municipality or county. (c)iiAn emergency medical services provider is prohibited from expanding operations to or stationing any emergency medical services vehicles in a municipality or county other than the municipality or county from which the provider obtained the letter of approval under this section until after the second anniversary of the date the provider s’ initial license was issued, unless the expansion or stationing occurs in connection with: (1)iia contract awarded by another municipality or county for the provision of emergency medical services; (2)iian emergency response made in connection with an existing mutual aid agreement; or (3)iian activation of a statewide emergency or disaster response by the department. (d)iiThis section does not apply to: (1)iirenewal of an emergency medical services provider license; or (2)iia municipality, county, emergency services district, hospital, or emergency medical services volunteer provider organization in this state that applies for an emergency medical services provider license. SECTIONi____.iiSection 773.0571, as amended by this Act, and Section 773.0573, as added by this Act, apply only to an application for approval of an emergency medical services provider license submitted to the Department of Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2265

State Health Services on or after the effective date of this Act. An application submitted before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect immediately before the effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CSHB 3556, as amended, was passed to engrossment. (Schaefer and Springer recorded voting no.) COMMITTEE GRANTED PERMISSION TO MEET Representative Hunter requested permission for the Committee on Calendars to meet while the house is in session, at 5:45ip.m. today, in 3W.15, to set a calendar. Permission to meet was granted. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: Calendars, 5:45 p.m. today, 3W.15, for a formal meeting, to set a calendar. REMARKS ORDERED PRINTED Representative Simpson moved to print his remarks on HBi124. The motion prevailed. CSHB 3238 ON SECOND READING (by McClendon, Naishtat, Coleman, J. Davis, Zerwas, et al.) CSHB 3238, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to disease control pilot programs to reduce the risk of certain communicable diseases; authorizing a fee. Amendment No. 1 Representative Y. Davis offered the following amendment to CSHBi3238: Amend CSHBi3238 (house committee printing) as follows: (1)iiOn page 3, insert the following between lines 13 and 14: (4)iiprovide for an HIV test as part of the participant s’ annual routine medical screening. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. LEAVES OF ABSENCE GRANTED The following members were granted leaves of absence temporarily for today to attend a committee meeting: Branch on motion of T. King. Button on motion of T. King. Cook on motion of T. King. Crownover on motion of T. King. S. Davis on motion of T. King. 2266 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Eiland on motion of T. King. Frullo on motion of T. King. Hunter on motion of T. King. Kuempel on motion of T. King. D. Miller on motion of T. King. The following members were granted leaves of absence for the remainder of today to attend a committee meeting: Alvarado on motion of T. King. Geren on motion of T. King. CSHB 3238 - (consideration continued) CSHB 3238, as amended, failed to pass to engrossment by (Record 470): 58 Yeas, 71 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. (The vote was later reconsidered on Friday, May 3, and CSHBi3238 was further amended and failed to pass to engrossment by Record No.i502.) Yeas — Allen; Alonzo; Anchia; Burnam; Canales; Coleman; Collier; Cortez; Davis, J.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dutton; Farias; Farrar; Giddings; Gonza´lez, M.; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Gutierrez; Hernandez Luna; Herrero; Howard; Huberty; Johnson; King, K.; King, S.; King, T.; Longoria; Lucio; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; Mene´ndez; Miles; Moody; Mun˜oz; Murphy; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Oliveira; Perez; Pickett; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Reynolds; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Smith; Strama; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; Villarreal; Vo; Walle; Wu. Nays — Anderson; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Burkett; Carter; Clardy; Craddick; Creighton; Dale; Darby; Elkins; Fallon; Farney; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Goldman; Gonzales; Gooden; Guillen; Harless; Harper-Brown; Hilderbran; Hughes; Isaac; Kacal; Keffer; King, P.; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Kolkhorst; Krause; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Lewis; Lozano; Miller, R.; Morrison; Orr; Otto; Paddie; Parker; Patrick; Perry; Riddle; Ritter; Sanford; Schaefer; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Simpson; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Taylor; Thompson, E.; Thompson, S.; Toth; Turner, E.S.; Villalba; White; Workman; Zedler. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ma´rquez(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Alvarado; Branch; Button; Cook; Crownover; Davis, S.; Eiland; Frullo; Geren; Hunter; Kuempel; Miller, D.; Pitts. Absent — Callegari; Capriglione; Larson; Phillips; Raymond; Zerwas. STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 470 was taken, I was excused to attend a meeting of the Committee on Calendars. I would have voted no. Button Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2267

When Record No. 470 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted no. Capriglione I was shown voting yes on Record No. 470. I intended to vote no. Mun˜oz When Record No. 470 was taken, my vote failed to register. I would have voted no. Phillips I was shown voting yes on Record No. 470. I intended to vote no. Ratliff CSSB 1251 ON SECOND READING (Villarreal - House Sponsor) CSSB 1251, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to authorized charges and terms for certain consumer loans. CSSB 1251 was considered in lieu of HB 2315. Representative Villarreal moved to postpone consideration of CSSBi1251 until 10ia.m. Monday, Mayi6. The motion prevailed. HB 2315 - LAID ON THE TABLE SUBJECT TO CALL Representative Villarreal moved to lay HBi2315 on the table subject to call. The motion prevailed. POSTPONED BUSINESS The following bills were laid before the house as postponed business: (Button, S. Davis, Eiland, Kuempel, and D. Miller now present) CSHB 3572 ON SECOND READING (by Hilderbran, Eiland, Otto, Bohac, Alvarado, et al.) CSHB 3572, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the administration, collection, and enforcement of taxes on mixed beverages; imposing a tax on sales of mixed beverages; decreasing the rate of the current tax on mixed beverages. CSHB 3572 was read second time earlier today and was postponed until this time. Amendment No. 1 Representative Hilderbran offered the following amendment to CSHBi3572: Amend CSHBi3572 (house committee report) on page 2, line 25, by striking "seven [14] percent" and substituting "6.7 [14] percent". Amendment No. 1 was adopted. 2268 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Amendment No. 2 Representative Hilderbran offered the following amendment to CSHBi3572: Amend CSHBi3572 (house committee report) as follows: (1)iiStrike page 3, lines 4 through 11, and substitute the following appropriately numbered SECTION: SECTIONi____.iiSections 183.0212(a) and (b), Tax Code, are amended to read as follows: (a)iiFor informational purposes only, a permittee may provide that each sales invoice, billing, service check, ticket, or other receipt to a customer for the purchase of an item subject to taxation under this subchapter [chapter] include: (1)iia separate statement disclosing the amount of tax to be paid by the permittee under this subchapter [chapter] in relation to that item; or (2)iia statement of the mixed beverage taxes, consisting of the combined amount of the tax to be paid by the permittee under this subchapter in relation to that item and the amount of tax imposed under Subchapter B-1 on that item. (b)iiA [The separate] statement under Subsection (a)(1) must clearly disclose the amount of tax payable by the permittee. (2)iiStrike page 6, lines 6 through 13, and substitute the following: Sec.i183.042.iiDISCLOSURE OF TAX. A permittee may provide that a sales invoice, billing, service check, ticket, or other receipt to a customer for the purchase of an item subject to taxation under this subchapter include: (1)iia statement that mixed beverage sales tax is included in the sales price; (2)iia separate statement of the amount of tax imposed under this subchapter on that item; or (3)iia statement of the mixed beverage taxes, consisting of the combined amount of the tax to be paid by the permittee under Subchapter B in relation to that item and the amount of tax imposed under this subchapter on that item. Amendment No. 2 was adopted. (Branch, Crownover, and Frullo now present) CSHB 3572, as amended, was passed to engrossment. CSHB 3238 - NOTICE GIVEN Pursuant to the provisions of Rulei7, Sectioni37(c) of the House Rules, at 5:56ip.m., Representative Lozano announced his intention to make the motion to reconsider the vote by which CSHBi3238, as amended, failed to pass to engrossment by Record No.i470. CSHB 3201 - VOTE RECONSIDERED Representative Kolkhorst moved to reconsider the vote by which CSHBi3201, as amended, was passed to engrossment. The motion to reconsider prevailed. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2269

CSHB 3201 ON SECOND READING (by Kolkhorst) The chair laid before the house, on its second reading and passage to engrossment, CSHB 3201, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the practice of dentistry; imposing surcharges and fees. CSHBi3201 was read second time earlier today and was passed to engrossment, as amended. Amendment No. 3 - Vote Reconsidered Representative Kolkhorst moved to reconsider the vote by which Amendment No.i3 was adopted. The motion to reconsider prevailed. Amendment No. 4 Representative Neva´rez offered the following amendment to Amendment No.i3: Amend Amendment No.i3 by Fletcher on CSHBi3201 by striking the text of the amendment and substituting the following: SECTIONi____.iiSection 254.018, Occupations Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec.i254.018.ii[EXPERT] TESTIMONY. A member of the board may not express an oral or written opinion or serve as an expert witness in a suit or administrative claim pending before the same board [involving a health care liability claim] against or for a person licensed or registered under this subtitle [dentist] for injury to or death of a patient or for a violation of the standard of care or the commission of malpractice [unless the member receives approval from the board or an executive committee of the board to serve as an expert witness]. Amendment No. 4 was adopted. Amendment No. 3, as amended, was adopted. CSHB 3201, as amended, was passed to engrossment. POSTPONED BUSINESS The following bills were laid before the house as postponed business: (Hunter now present) CSHB 1010 ON SECOND READING (by S. King) CSHB 1010, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to the penalty for causing certain assaultive physical contact with a child. CSHB 1010 was read second time earlier today and was postponed until this time. 2270 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Amendment No. 1 Representatives S. King and Moody offered the following amendment to CSHBi1010: Amend CSHBi1010 (house committee report) by striking added SECTION 2 (beginning on page 1, line 12, through page 2, line 16) and substituting the following: SECTIONi2.iiSection 22.01(c), Penal Code, is amended to read as follows: (c)iiAn offense under Subsection (a)(2) or (3) is a Class C misdemeanor, except that the offense is: (1)iia Class A misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(3) against an elderly individual or disabled individual, as those terms are defined by Section 22.04; [or] (2)iia Class A misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(3) by a person who is 17 years of age or older against a child as defined by Section 22.04; or (3)i[(2)]iia Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed by a person who is not a sports participant against a person the actor knows is a sports participant either: (A)iiwhile the participant is performing duties or responsibilities in the participant s’ capacity as a sports participant; or (B)iiin retaliation for or on account of the participant s’ performance of a duty or responsibility within the participant s’ capacity as a sports participant. MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE A message from the senate was received at this time (see the addendum to the daily journal, Messages from the Senate, Message No. 4). (Cook now present) CSHB 1010 - (consideration continued) Amendment No. 1 - Point of Order Representative Schaefer raised a point of order against further consideration of Amendment No.i1. The point of order was withdrawn. Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CSHB 1010, as amended, was passed to engrossment by (Record 471): 96 Yeas, 38 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. Yeas — Anchia; Ashby; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, G.; Branch; Burkett; Burnam; Button; Callegari; Capriglione; Carter; Clardy; Coleman; Cook; Craddick; Creighton; Crownover; Dale; Darby; Davis, J.; Davis, S.; Elkins; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Flynn; Frullo; Goldman; Gonzales; Gonza´ lez, M.; Gooden; Guillen; Gutierrez; Harless; Harper-Brown; Herrero; Hilderbran; Howard; Hunter; Isaac; Johnson; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; Kolkhorst; Krause; Kuempel; Larson; Laubenberg; Lavender; Leach; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; Mene´ndez; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Mun˜oz; Naishtat; Neva´rez; Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2271

Orr; Otto; Parker; Patrick; Perez; Phillips; Pickett; Price; Raney; Ratliff; Raymond; Riddle; Ritter; Rodriguez, E.; Sanford; Sheets; Sheffield, J.; Sheffield, R.; Simmons; Smithee; Springer; Stephenson; Strama; Thompson, E.; Toth; Turner, C.; Turner, E.S.; Villalba; Villarreal; Walle; White; Workman; Wu; Zedler. Nays — Allen; Alonzo; Bonnen, D.; Canales; Collier; Cortez; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dutton; Fallon; Farias; Frank; Gonzalez, N.; Guerra; Hernandez Luna; Huberty; Hughes; Kleinschmidt; Klick; Lewis; Longoria; Lozano; Lucio; Miles; Murphy; Oliveira; Perry; Reynolds; Rodriguez, J.; Rose; Schaefer; Simpson; Smith; Stickland; Taylor; Thompson, S.; Turner, S.; Vo. Present, not voting — Mr. Speaker; Ma´rquez(C). Absent, Excused, Committee Meeting — Alvarado; Geren; Pitts. Absent — Anderson; Aycock; Dukes; Eiland; Giddings; Kacal; Keffer; King, T.; McClendon; Paddie; Zerwas. STATEMENTS OF VOTE When Record No. 471 was taken, I was in the house but away from my desk. I would have voted no. Anderson I was shown voting yes on Record No. 471. I intended to vote no. Callegari I was shown voting no on Record No. 471. I intended to vote yes. Canales I was shown voting no on Record No. 471. I intended to vote yes. Fallon I was shown voting no on Record No. 471. I intended to vote yes. Guerra I was shown voting yes on Record No. 471. I intended to vote no. Price I was shown voting no on Record No. 471. I intended to vote yes. J. Rodriguez COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS The following committee meetings were announced: Government Efficiency and Reform, upon final adjournment today, Desk 77, for a formal meeting, to consider pending business. Homeland Security and Public Safety, upon final adjournment today, Desk 15, for a formal meeting, to consider pending business. Public Health, upon final adjournment today, Desk 100, for a formal meeting, to consider pending business. 2272 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Insurance, upon final adjournment today, Desk 13, for a formal meeting, to consider pending business. COMMITTEE GRANTED PERMISSION TO MEET Representative Cook requested permission for the Committee on State Affairs to meet while the house is in session, during bill referral today, in 1W.14, to consider pending and previously posted business. Permission to meet was granted. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: State Affairs, during bill referral today, 1W.14, for a formal meeting, to consider pending and previously posted business. FIVE-DAY POSTING RULE SUSPENDED Representative D. Bonnen moved to suspend the five-day posting rule to allow the Committee on Ways and Means to consider HBi509, HBi607, HBi716, HBi1338, HBi1943, HBi3742, HJRi84, and HJRi102 at 8:30ia.m. Saturday, Mayi4 in E2.014. The motion prevailed. COMMITTEE MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT The following committee meeting was announced: Ways and Means, 8:30 a.m. Saturday, May 4, E2.014, for a public hearing, to consider HBi509, HBi607, HBi716, HBi1338, HBi1943, HBi3742, HJRi84, HJRi102, and pending business. SB 1803 - RECOMMITTED Representative Raymond moved to recommit SBi1803 to the Committee on Human Services. The motion prevailed. HB 1829 - RECOMMITTED Representative Raymond moved to recommit HBi1829 to the Committee on Human Services. The motion prevailed. PROVIDING FOR ADJOURNMENT At 6:46 p.m., Representative Elkins moved that, at the conclusion of the reading of bills and resolutions on first reading and referral to committees, the house adjourn until 10ia.m. tomorrow in memory of Helen W. Prince of Southold, New York. The motion prevailed. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2273

BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS ON FIRST READING AND REFERRAL TO COMMITTEES RESOLUTIONS REFERRED TO COMMITTEES Bills and joint resolutions were at this time laid before the house, read first time, and referred to committees. Resolutions were at this time laid before the house and referred to committees. (See the addendum to the daily journal, Referred to Committees, List No. 1.) (Taylor in the chair) ADJOURNMENT In accordance with a previous motion, the house, at 6:52ip.m., adjourned until 10ia.m. tomorrow.

AAAAAADDENDUMAAAAA

REFERRED TO COMMITTEES The following bills and joint resolutions were today laid before the house, read first time, and referred to committees, and the following resolutions were today laid before the house and referred to committees. If indicated, the chair today corrected the referral of the following measures: List No. 1 HR 1809 (By R. Sheffield), In memory of Ina Faye Minyard McGinnis of Troy. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1810 (By E. S. Turner), Congratulating Spencer Sosnowski of Rockwall-Heath High School on his selection to perform with the U.S. Marine Corps Band. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1811 (By Ma´rquez), Congratulating El Paso artist and author Bill "Rak" Rakocy on his 89th birthday. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1815 (By J. Sheffield), Paying tribute to the life of Michael Cook Walton of Stephenville. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1816 (By Farney), Congratulating Dr. Michael Douglas on being named executive director of the Texas Life-Sciences Collaboration Center in Georgetown. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1818 (By Farney), Congratulating the Marble Falls Independent School District on receiving perfect scores at all campuses on its most recent cafeteria health inspection. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1819 (By Dutton), Commending Dr. W. E. Bosarge, Jr., of Houston on his achievements. To Rules and Resolutions. 2274 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

HR 1820 (By Dutton), Commending Marie Taylor Bosarge of Houston on her contributions to her community. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1821 (By Wu), Commemorating the Memorial Hermann Foundation 2013 Circle of Life Gala and the fund-raising campaign Revolutionizing Neuroscience and honoring Elizabeth and Gary Petersen for their philanthropy. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1822 (By Wu), In memory of the Reverend Ben Sanchez Riojas of Houston. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1823 (By Wu), In memory of Ralph Kilpatrick Cox Brown of Houston. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1824 (By Mene´ndez), Honoring David Sinclair for his 40 years of service to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1825 (By Mene´ndez), Congratulating Colonel Pete Flores on his retirement as Law Enforcement Division director of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1826 (By Mene´ndez), Congratulating Susan Blackwood on her achievements as executive director of San Antonio Sports. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1827 (By Sanford), Commending Blake Allen for his service as deputy district director in the office of State Representative Scott Sanford. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1828 (By J. Rodriguez), Commending Leon Valley on earning designation as a "Tree City USA" by the Arbor Day Foundation and Texas A&M Forest Service. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1830 (By Gooden), In memory of Gilbert Willie, Sr., of Terrell. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1831 (By G. Bonnen), Congratulating Brittany Harris on her receipt of the Service Above Self Award from the Friendswood Rotary Club. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1832 (By G. Bonnen), In memory of Taylor Lake Village Mayor-elect Lilian Norman Keeney. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1833 (By G. Bonnen), Congratulating Devon Joel Carter of Friendswood on attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1834 (By Lewis), Commemorating the 10th Annual Senior Celebration in Ector County. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1835 (By Bohac), Commending Thomas Neumann on his service as executive director of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1836 (By Bohac), Honoring Judge Herman Paul Pressler III of Houston for his service to the State of Texas. To Rules and Resolutions. Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2275

HR 1837 (By Bohac), Congratulating Wayne F. Schaper, Sr., on having the Spring Branch ISD administration building named in his honor. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1838 (By Bohac), In memory of David Allan Schwerdtfeger of Seguin. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1839 (By Bohac), Honoring U.S. Circuit Judge Jerry E. Smith for his 25 years of service on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1840 (By Bohac), In memory of Stella Marion Hawes of Mineral Wells. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1841 (By Bohac), In memory of Lloyd "Bland" McReynolds of Houston. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1842 (By Bohac), In memory of Miguel A. Hernandez of Houston. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1843 (By T. King), Commemorating the rededication of the SSgt. Willie De Leon Civic Center in Uvalde. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1844 (By Price), Congratulating the Valero McKee Refinery on its receipt of a Texas Environmental Excellence Award. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1845 (By Sanford), Congratulating Christopher Paxton for his service as legislative director for Representative Scott Sanford. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1847 (By Craddick), Congratulating Dally Willis of Midland on his 93rd birthday. To Rules and Resolutions. HR 1848 (By Gutierrez), In memory of Vojt J. Holub of San Antonio. To Rules and Resolutions. SB 38 to Public Education. SB 39 to Public Education. SB 110 to Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. SB 377 to Public Education. SB 766 to Licensing and Administrative Procedures. SB 1191 to Public Health. SB 1360 to Criminal Jurisprudence. SB 1401 to Public Health. SB 1427 to Agriculture and Livestock. SB 1451 to Criminal Jurisprudence. SB 1606 to Ways and Means. SB 1662 to Ways and Means. SB 1750 to Agriculture and Livestock. SB 1799 to Public Education. SB 1878 to Special Purpose Districts. SB 1883 to Special Purpose Districts. 2276 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

SB 1889 to Public Health. SJR 54 to County Affairs. SIGNED BY THE SPEAKER The following bills and resolutions were today signed in the presence of the house by the speaker: Senate List No. 20 SBi283, SBi294, SBi297, SBi312, SBi618, SBi966, SBi1248 MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE The following messages from the senate were today received by the house: Message No. 2 MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE SENATE CHAMBER Austin, Texas Thursday, May 2, 2013 - 2 The Honorable Speaker of the House House Chamber Austin, Texas Mr. Speaker: I am directed by the senate to inform the house that the senate has taken the following action: THE SENATE HAS PASSED THE FOLLOWING MEASURES: HCR 31 Eiland SPONSOR: Taylor Designating the Kemp s’ ridley sea turtle as the official State Sea Turtle of Texas. SB 171 West Relating to the establishment of a workgroup to study the use by state agencies of a uniform application form following disasters. SB 338 Rodrı´guez Relating to the liability of certain social workers who provide volunteer health care services to charitable organizations. SB 644 Huffman Relating to the creation of a standard request form for prior authorization of prescription drug benefits. SB 1258 Hinojosa Relating to improving access to nursing education programs. SB 1436 Paxton Relating to the service retirement annuity of certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan One. SB 1836 Deuell Relating to the funding of the Texas Home Visiting Program; authorizing voluntary contributions. SB 1890 Hinojosa Relating to procedures for the dissolution of the Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 3. Respectfully, Patsy Spaw Secretary of the Senate Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2277

Message No. 3 MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE SENATE CHAMBER Austin, Texas Thursday, May 2, 2013 - 3 The Honorable Speaker of the House House Chamber Austin, Texas Mr. Speaker: I am directed by the senate to inform the house that the senate has taken the following action: THE SENATE HAS PASSED THE FOLLOWING MEASURES: SB 514 Davis Relating to the installation, maintenance, operation, and relocation of saltwater pipeline facilities. SB 977 West Relating to the procedure used to petition for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information. SB 1216 Eltife Relating to the creation of a standard request form for prior authorization of medical care or health care services. SB 1801 Watson Relating to the adoption of fire hydrant requirements for a wildland-urban interface in certain municipalities. Respectfully, Patsy Spaw Secretary of the Senate Message No. 4 MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE SENATE CHAMBER Austin, Texas Thursday, May 2, 2013 - 4 The Honorable Speaker of the House House Chamber Austin, Texas Mr. Speaker: I am directed by the senate to inform the house that the senate has taken the following action: THE SENATE HAS PASSED THE FOLLOWING MEASURES: SB 212 Nichols Relating to the continuation, functions, and name of the Railroad Commission of Texas; providing for the imposition of fees and the elimination of a fee. SB 873 Hegar Relating to the permitting authority of a groundwater conservation district for the drilling or operation of a water well used to supply water for the drilling, exploration, or production of oil or gas. SB 1727 Deuell Relating to the use of the Texas emissions reduction plan fund. SB 1775 West 2278 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION

Relating to school campus information, student transfers, and the public education grant program. Respectfully, Patsy Spaw Secretary of the Senate

AAAAAAPPENDIXAAAAA

STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS Favorable reports have been filed by committees as follows: May 1 Agriculture and Livestock - HBi1998 Business and Industry - HBi3750, SBi60, SBi887 County Affairs - HBi714, HBi1384, HBi3895, HBi3949, HBi3950, HBi3951, HJRi148 Criminal Jurisprudence - HBi2559, SBi1114 (corrected) Economic and Small Business Development - HBi2181, HBi2390 Elections - HBi1398 Environmental Regulation - HBi3110 Higher Education - HBi1004, HBi2036, HBi3498 Human Services - HBi1143, HBi1396, HBi1633, HBi1828, SBi1236 Insurance - HBi1183, HBi2717, HBi3451, SBi147 Investments and Financial Services - HBi1575, SBi581 Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - HBi1710, HBi2547, HBi2930, HBi3170 Land and Resource Management - SBi1157 Licensing and Administrative Procedures - HBi619, HBi871, HBi2378, HBi3038 Natural Resources - HBi1796, HBi2133, HBi2577, HBi2739, HBi3924, SBi567 Public Health - HBi947, HBi1039, HBi2709, SBi406, SBi869 Special Purpose Districts - HBi1157, HBi1357, HBi3911, HBi3913, HBi3917, HBi3932, HBi3933 State Affairs - HBi2342, HJRi150, SBi1023 Transparency in State Agency Operations, Select - HBi9, HBi12, HBi16 Transportation - SBi1489 Ways and Means - HBi97, HBi178, HBi214, HBi357, HBi500, HBi862, HBi875, HBi1060, HBi1202, HBi1655, HBi2139, HBi2274, HBi2445, HBi2972, HBi3121, HBi3169, HJRi21, HJRi24, HJRi62, HJRi72, HJRi133 Thursday, May 2, 2013 HOUSE JOURNAL — 63rd Day 2279

ENGROSSED May 1 - HBi21, HBi127, HBi259, HBi489, HBi517, HBi545, HBi580, HBi642, HBi697, HBi717, HBi824, HBi827, HBi939, HBi1086, HBi1372, HBi2259, HBi2442, HBi2443, HBi2961, HBi3176, HJRi147 ENROLLED May 1 - HCRi47, HCRi67, HCRi105, HCRi107 TAB 5 1-1 By:AAVillarreal, Workman, King of Parker H.B.ANo.A585 1-2 AAAA(Senate SponsorA-AEltife) 1-3 (In the SenateA-AReceived from the House MayA6,A2013; 1-4 MayA9,A2013, read first time and referred to Committee on Finance; 1-5 MayA20,A2013, reported adversely, with favorable Committee 1-6 Substitute by the following vote: Yeas 13, Nays 1; MayA20,A2013, 1-7 sent to printer.)

1-8 COMMITTEE VOTE

1-9 AAAAAAAAAAAAAA Yea Nay AbsentA PNV 1-10 WilliamsAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-11 HinojosaAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-12 DeuellAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-13 DuncanAAAAAAAA AAA AXA AAAAAAA AAA 1-14 EltifeAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-15 EstesAAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-16 HegarAAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-17 HuffmanAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-18 LucioAAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-19 NelsonAAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-20 PatrickAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-21 SeligerAAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-22 WestAAAAAAAAAA AAA AAA AAAXAAA AAA 1-23 WhitmireAAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA 1-24 ZaffiriniAAAAA AXA AAA AAAAAAA AAA

1-25 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR H.B.ANo.A585 By:AAEltife

1-26 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1-27 AN ACT

1-28 relating to ad valorem taxation; creating an offense. 1-29 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-30 SECTIONA1.AASection 5.041, Tax Code, is amended by adding 1-31 Subsection (b-1) and amending Subsections (e-2) and (f) to read as 1-32 follows: 1-33 (b-1)AAAt the conclusion of a course established under 1-34 Subsection (a), each member of an appraisal review board in 1-35 attendance shall complete a statement, on a form prescribed by the 1-36 comptroller, indicating that the member will comply with the 1-37 requirements of this title in conducting hearings. 1-38 (e-2)AADuring [As soon as practicable after the beginning of] 1-39 the second year of an appraisal review board member ’s term of 1-40 office, the member must successfully complete the course 1-41 established under Subsection (e-1).AAAt the conclusion of the 1-42 course, the member must complete a statement described by 1-43 Subsection (b-1). A person may not participate in a hearing 1-44 conducted by the board, vote on a determination of a protest, or be 1-45 reappointed to an additional term on the board until the person has 1-46 completed [who fails to timely complete] the course established 1-47 under Subsection (e-1) and has received a certificate of course 1-48 completion [may not be reappointed to an additional term on the 1-49 appraisal review board].AAIf the person is reappointed to an 1-50 additional term on the appraisal review board, the person must 1-51 successfully complete the course established under Subsection 1-52 (e-1) and comply with the other requirements of this subsection in 1-53 each year the member continues to serve. 1-54 (f)AAThe comptroller may not advise a property owner, a 1-55 property owner ’s agent, or the chief appraiser or another employee 1-56 of an appraisal district[, or an appraisal review board] on a matter 1-57 that the comptroller knows is the subject of a protest to the 1-58 appraisal review board. The comptroller may provide advice to an 1-59 appraisal review board member as authorized by Subsection (a)(4) of 1-60 this section or Section 5.103 and may communicate with the chairman

1 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 2-1 of an appraisal review board or a taxpayer liaison officer 2-2 concerning a complaint filed under Section 6.052. 2-3 SECTIONA2.AAChapter 5, Tax Code, is amended by adding Section 2-4 5.103 to read as follows: 2-5 Sec.A5.103.AAAPPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD OVERSIGHT. (a) The 2-6 comptroller shall prepare model hearing procedures for appraisal 2-7 review boards. 2-8 (b)AAThe model hearing procedures shall address: 2-9 (1)AAthe statutory duties of an appraisal review board; 2-10 (2)AAthe process for conducting a hearing; 2-11 (3)AAthe scheduling of hearings; 2-12 (4)AAthe postponement of hearings; 2-13 (5)AAthe notices required under this title; 2-14 (6)AAthe determination of good cause under Section 2-15 41.44(b); 2-16 (7)AAthe determination of good cause under Sections 2-17 41.45(e) and (e-1); 2-18 (8)AAa party ’s right to offer evidence and argument; 2-19 (9)AAa party ’s right to examine or cross-examine 2-20 witnesses or other parties; 2-21 (10)AAa party ’s right to appear by an agent; 2-22 (11)AAthe prohibition of an appraisal review board ’s 2-23 consideration of information not provided at a hearing; 2-24 (12)AAex parte and other prohibited communications; 2-25 (13)AAthe exclusion of evidence at a hearing as 2-26 required by Section 41.67(d); 2-27 (14)AAthe postponement of a hearing as required by 2-28 Section 41.66(h); 2-29 (15)AAconflicts of interest; 2-30 (16)AAthe process for the administration of 2-31 applications for membership on an appraisal review board; and 2-32 (17)AAany other matter related to fair and efficient 2-33 appraisal review board hearings. 2-34 (c)AAThe comptroller may: 2-35 (1)AAcategorize appraisal districts based on the size 2-36 of the district, the number of protests filed in the district, or 2-37 similar characteristics; and 2-38 (2)AAdevelop different model hearing procedures for 2-39 different categories of districts. 2-40 (d)AAAn appraisal review board shall follow the model hearing 2-41 procedures prepared by the comptroller when establishing its 2-42 procedures for hearings as required by Section 41.66(a). 2-43 (e)AAThe comptroller shall prescribe the contents of a survey 2-44 form for the purpose of providing the public a reasonable 2-45 opportunity to offer comments and suggestions concerning the 2-46 appraisal review board established for an appraisal district. The 2-47 survey form must permit a person to offer comments and suggestions 2-48 concerning the matters listed in Subsection (b) or any other matter 2-49 related to the fairness and efficiency of the appraisal review 2-50 board. The survey form, together with instructions for completing 2-51 the form and submitting the form, shall be provided to each property 2-52 owner at or before each hearing on a protest conducted by an 2-53 appraisal review board. The appraisal office may provide clerical 2-54 assistance to the comptroller for purposes of the implementation of 2-55 this subsection, including assistance in providing and receiving 2-56 the survey form. The comptroller, or an appraisal office providing 2-57 clerical assistance to the comptroller, may provide for the 2-58 provision and submission of survey forms electronically. 2-59 (f)AAThe comptroller shall issue an annual report 2-60 summarizing the survey forms submitted by property owners 2-61 concerning each appraisal review board. The report may not 2-62 disclose the identity of a person who submits a survey form. 2-63 SECTIONA3.AASection 6.035, Tax Code, is amended by adding 2-64 Subsection (a-1) to read as follows: 2-65 (a-1)AAAn individual is ineligible to serve on an appraisal 2-66 district board of directors if the individual has engaged in the 2-67 business of appraising property for compensation for use in 2-68 proceedings under this title or of representing property owners for 2-69 compensation in proceedings under this title in the appraisal

2 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 3-1 district at any time during the preceding five years. 3-2 SECTIONA4.AASection 6.052, Tax Code, is amended by amending 3-3 Subsections (a), (b), (c), and (e) and adding Subsection (f) to read 3-4 as follows: 3-5 (a)AAThe board of directors for an appraisal district created 3-6 for a county with a population of more than 120,000 [125,000] shall 3-7 appoint a taxpayer liaison officer who shall serve at the pleasure 3-8 of the board. The taxpayer liaison officer shall administer the 3-9 public access functions required by Sections 6.04(d), (e), and (f), 3-10 and is responsible for resolving disputes not involving matters 3-11 that may be protested under Section 41.41. In addition, the 3-12 taxpayer liaison officer is responsible for receiving, and 3-13 compiling a list of, comments and suggestions filed by the chief 3-14 appraiser, a property owner, or a property owner ’s agent concerning 3-15 the matters listed in Section 5.103(b) or any other matter related 3-16 to the fairness and efficiency of the appraisal review board 3-17 established for the appraisal district. The taxpayer liaison 3-18 officer shall forward to the comptroller comments and suggestions 3-19 filed under this subsection in the form and manner prescribed by the 3-20 comptroller. 3-21 (b)AAThe taxpayer liaison officer shall [may] provide to the 3-22 public information and materials designed to assist property owners 3-23 in understanding the appraisal process, protest procedures, the 3-24 procedure for filing comments and suggestions under Subsection (a) 3-25 of this section or a complaint under Section 6.04(g), and other 3-26 [related] matters. Information concerning the process for 3-27 submitting comments and suggestions to the comptroller concerning 3-28 an appraisal review board shall be provided at each protest 3-29 hearing. 3-30 (c)AAThe taxpayer liaison officer shall report to the board 3-31 at each meeting on the status of all comments and suggestions 3-32 [complaints] filed with the officer under Subsection (a) of this 3-33 section and all complaints filed with the board under Section 3-34 6.04(g). 3-35 (e)AAThe chief appraiser or any other person who performs 3-36 appraisal or legal services for the appraisal district for 3-37 compensation is not eligible to be the taxpayer liaison officer 3-38 [for the appraisal district]. 3-39 (f)AAThe taxpayer liaison officer for an appraisal district 3-40 described by Section 6.41(d-1) is responsible for providing 3-41 clerical assistance to the local administrative district judge in 3-42 the selection of appraisal review board members. The officer shall 3-43 deliver to the local administrative district judge any applications 3-44 to serve on the board that are submitted to the officer and shall 3-45 perform other duties as requested by the local administrative 3-46 district judge. The officer may not influence the process for 3-47 selecting appraisal review board members. 3-48 SECTIONA5.AASection 6.41, Tax Code, is amended by amending 3-49 Subsections (d-1) and (f) and adding Subsections (i), (j), and (k) 3-50 to read as follows: 3-51 (d-1)AAIn a county with a population of 120,000 [3.3 million 3-52 or more or a county with a population of 550,000 or more that is 3-53 adjacent to a county with a population of 3.3 million] or more the 3-54 members of the board are appointed by the local administrative 3-55 district judge under Subchapter D, Chapter 74, Government Code, in 3-56 the county in which the appraisal district is established. All 3-57 applications submitted to the appraisal district or to the 3-58 appraisal review board from persons seeking appointment as a member 3-59 of the appraisal review board shall be delivered to the local 3-60 administrative district judge. The appraisal district may provide 3-61 the local administrative district judge with information regarding 3-62 whether an applicant for appointment to or a member of the board 3-63 owes any delinquent ad valorem taxes to a taxing unit participating 3-64 in the appraisal district. 3-65 (f)AAA member of the board may be removed from the board by a 3-66 majority vote of the appraisal district board of directors, or by 3-67 the local administrative district judge or the judge ’s designee, as 3-68 applicable, that appointed the member. Grounds for removal are: 3-69 (1)AAa violation of Section 6.412, 6.413, 41.66(f), or

3 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 4-1 41.69; [or] 4-2 (2)AAgood cause relating to the attendance of members 4-3 at called meetings of the board as established by written policy 4-4 adopted by a majority of the appraisal district board of directors; 4-5 or 4-6 (3)AAclear and convincing evidence of repeated bias or 4-7 misconduct. 4-8 (i)AAThis subsection applies only to an appraisal district 4-9 described by Subsection (d-1). A chief appraiser or another 4-10 employee or agent of the appraisal district, a member of the 4-11 appraisal review board for the appraisal district, a member of the 4-12 board of directors of the appraisal district, a property tax 4-13 consultant, or an agent of a property owner commits an offense if 4-14 the person communicates with the local administrative district 4-15 judge regarding the appointment of appraisal review board members. 4-16 This subsection does not apply to: 4-17 (1)AAa communication between a member of the appraisal 4-18 review board and the local administrative district judge regarding 4-19 the member ’s reappointment to the board; 4-20 (2)AAa communication between the taxpayer liaison 4-21 officer for the appraisal district and the local administrative 4-22 district judge in the course of the performance of the officer ’s 4-23 clerical duties so long as the officer does not offer an opinion or 4-24 comment regarding the appointment of appraisal review board 4-25 members; or 4-26 (3)AAa communication between a chief appraiser or 4-27 another employee or agent of the appraisal district, a member of the 4-28 appraisal review board for the appraisal district, or a member of 4-29 the board of directors of the appraisal district and the local 4-30 administrative district judge regarding information described by 4-31 Subsection (d-1) of this section or Section 411.1296, Government 4-32 Code. 4-33 (j)AAA chief appraiser or another employee or agent of an 4-34 appraisal district commits an offense if the person communicates 4-35 with a member of the appraisal review board for the appraisal 4-36 district, a member of the board of directors of the appraisal 4-37 district, or, if the appraisal district is an appraisal district 4-38 described by Subsection (d-1), the local administrative district 4-39 judge regarding a ranking, scoring, or reporting of the percentage 4-40 by which the appraisal review board or a panel of the board reduces 4-41 the appraised value of property. 4-42 (k)AAAn offense under Subsection (i) or (j) is a Class A 4-43 misdemeanor. 4-44 SECTIONA6.AASection 6.411(c-1), Tax Code, is amended to read 4-45 as follows: 4-46 (c-1)AAThis section does not apply to communications with a 4-47 member of an appraisal review board by [involving] the chief 4-48 appraiser or another employee or a member of the board of directors 4-49 of an appraisal district or a property tax consultant or attorney 4-50 representing a party to a proceeding before [and a member of] the 4-51 appraisal review board: 4-52 (1)AAduring a hearing on a protest or other proceeding 4-53 before the appraisal review board; 4-54 (2)AAthat constitute social conversation; 4-55 (3)AAthat are specifically limited to and involve 4-56 administrative, clerical, or logistical matters related to the 4-57 scheduling and operation of hearings, the processing of documents, 4-58 the issuance of orders, notices, and subpoenas, and the operation, 4-59 appointment, composition, or attendance at training of the 4-60 appraisal review board; or 4-61 (4)AAthat are necessary and appropriate to enable the 4-62 board of directors of the appraisal district to determine whether 4-63 to appoint, reappoint, or remove a person as a member or the 4-64 chairman or secretary of the appraisal review board. 4-65 SECTIONA7.AAChapter 21, Tax Code, is amended by adding 4-66 Sections 21.09 and 21.10 to read as follows: 4-67 Sec.A21.09.AAALLOCATION APPLICATION. (a) To receive an 4-68 allocation authorized by Section 21.03, 21.031, 21.05, or 21.055, a 4-69 person claiming the allocation must apply for the allocation. To

4 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 5-1 apply for an allocation, a person must file an allocation 5-2 application form with the chief appraiser in the appraisal district 5-3 in which the property subject to the claimed allocation has taxable 5-4 situs. 5-5 (b)AAA person claiming an allocation must apply for the 5-6 allocation each year the person claims the allocation. A person 5-7 claiming an allocation must file a completed allocation application 5-8 form before May 1 and must provide the information required by the 5-9 form. If the property was not on the appraisal roll in the 5-10 preceding year, the deadline for filing the allocation application 5-11 form is extended to the 45th day after the date of receipt of the 5-12 notice of appraised value required by Section 25.19(a)(3). For 5-13 good cause shown, the chief appraiser shall extend the deadline for 5-14 filing an allocation application form by written order for a period 5-15 not to exceed 60 days. 5-16 (c)AAThe comptroller shall prescribe the contents of the 5-17 allocation application form and shall ensure that the form requires 5-18 an applicant to provide the information necessary to determine the 5-19 validity of the allocation claim. 5-20 (d)AAIf the chief appraiser learns of any reason indicating 5-21 that an allocation previously allowed should be canceled, the chief 5-22 appraiser shall investigate. If the chief appraiser determines 5-23 that the property is not entitled to an allocation, the chief 5-24 appraiser shall cancel the allocation and deliver written notice of 5-25 the cancellation not later than the fifth day after the date the 5-26 chief appraiser makes the cancellation. A person may protest the 5-27 cancellation of an allocation. 5-28 (e)AAThe filing of a rendition under Chapter 22 is not a 5-29 condition of qualification for an allocation. 5-30 Sec.A21.10.AALATE APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION. (a) The chief 5-31 appraiser shall accept and approve or deny an application for an 5-32 allocation under Section 21.09 after the deadline for filing the 5-33 application has passed if the application is filed before the date 5-34 the appraisal review board approves the appraisal records. 5-35 (b)AAIf the application is approved, the property owner is 5-36 liable to each taxing unit for a penalty in an amount equal to 10 5-37 percent of the difference between the amount of tax imposed by the 5-38 taxing unit on the property without the allocation and the amount of 5-39 tax imposed on the property with the allocation. 5-40 (c)AAThe chief appraiser shall make an entry on the appraisal 5-41 records for the property indicating the property owner ’s liability 5-42 for the penalty and shall deliver a written notice of imposition of 5-43 the penalty, explaining the reason for its imposition, to the 5-44 property owner. 5-45 (d)AAThe tax assessor for a taxing unit that taxes the 5-46 property shall add the amount of the penalty to the property owner ’s 5-47 tax bill, and the tax collector for the unit shall collect the 5-48 penalty at the time and in the manner the collector collects the 5-49 tax. The amount of the penalty constitutes a lien against the 5-50 property against which the penalty is imposed, as if the penalty 5-51 were a tax, and accrues penalty and interest in the same manner as a 5-52 delinquent tax. 5-53 SECTIONA8.AASection 22.01, Tax Code, is amended by adding 5-54 Subsections (c-1), (c-2), and (d-1) to read as follows: 5-55 (c-1)AAIn this section: 5-56 (1)AA"Secured party" has the meaning assigned by 5-57 Section 9.102, Business & Commerce Code. 5-58 (2)AA"Security interest" has the meaning assigned by 5-59 Section 1.201, Business & Commerce Code. 5-60 (c-2)AAWith the consent of the property owner, a secured 5-61 party may render for taxation any property of the property owner in 5-62 which the secured party has a security interest on January 1, 5-63 although the secured party is not required to render the property by 5-64 Subsection (a) or (b). This subsection applies only to property 5-65 that has a historical cost when new of more than $50,000. 5-66 (d-1)AAA secured party who renders property under Subsection 5-67 (c-2) shall indicate the party ’s status as a secured party and shall 5-68 state the name and address of the property owner. A secured party 5-69 is not liable for inaccurate information included on the rendition

5 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 6-1 statement if the property owner supplied the information or for 6-2 failure to timely file the rendition statement if the property 6-3 owner failed to promptly cooperate with the secured party. A 6-4 secured party may rely on information provided by the property 6-5 owner with respect to: 6-6 (1)AAthe accuracy of information in the rendition 6-7 statement; 6-8 (2)AAthe appraisal district in which the rendition 6-9 statement must be filed; and 6-10 (3)AAcompliance with any provisions of this chapter 6-11 that require the property owner to supply additional information. 6-12 SECTIONA9.AASection 22.24(e), Tax Code, is amended to read as 6-13 follows: 6-14 (e)AATo be valid, a rendition or report must be sworn to 6-15 before an officer authorized by law to administer an oath. The 6-16 comptroller may not prescribe or approve a rendition or report form 6-17 unless the form provides for the person filing the form to swear 6-18 that the information provided in the rendition or report is true and 6-19 accurate to the best of the person ’s knowledge and belief. This 6-20 subsection does not apply to a rendition or report filed by a 6-21 secured party, as defined by Section 22.01, the property owner, an 6-22 employee of the property owner, or an employee of a property owner 6-23 on behalf of an affiliated entity of the property owner. 6-24 SECTIONA10.AASection 31.11, Tax Code, is amended by adding 6-25 Subsections (j) and (k) to read as follows: 6-26 (j)AAIf the collector for a taxing unit does not respond to an 6-27 application for a refund on or before the 90th day after the date 6-28 the application is filed with the collector, the application is 6-29 presumed to have been denied. 6-30 (k)AANot later than the 60th day after the date the collector 6-31 for a taxing unit denies an application for a refund, the taxpayer 6-32 may file suit against the taxing unit in district court to compel 6-33 the payment of the refund. If the collector collects taxes for more 6-34 than one taxing unit, the taxpayer may join in the suit each taxing 6-35 unit on behalf of which the collector denied the refund. If the 6-36 taxpayer prevails in the suit, the taxpayer may be awarded: 6-37 (1)AAcosts of court; and 6-38 (2)AAreasonable attorney ’s fees in an amount not to 6-39 exceed the greater of: 6-40 (A)AA$1,500; or 6-41 (B)AA30 percent of the total amount of the refund 6-42 determined by the court to be due. 6-43 SECTIONA11.AASection 33.48(a), Tax Code, is amended to read 6-44 as follows: 6-45 (a)AAIn addition to other costs authorized by law, a taxing 6-46 unit is entitled to recover the following costs and expenses in a 6-47 suit to collect a delinquent tax: 6-48 (1)AAall usual court costs, including the cost of 6-49 serving process and electronic filing fees; 6-50 (2)AAcosts of filing for record a notice of lis pendens 6-51 against property; 6-52 (3)AAexpenses of foreclosure sale; 6-53 (4)AAreasonable expenses that are incurred by the 6-54 taxing unit in determining the name, identity, and location of 6-55 necessary parties and in procuring necessary legal descriptions of 6-56 the property on which a delinquent tax is due; 6-57 (5)AAattorney ’s fees in the amount of 15 percent of the 6-58 total amount of taxes, penalties, and interest due the unit; and 6-59 (6)AAreasonable attorney ad litem fees approved by the 6-60 court that are incurred in a suit in which the court orders the 6-61 appointment of an attorney to represent the interests of a 6-62 defendant served with process by means of citation by publication 6-63 or posting. 6-64 SECTIONA12.AASection 33.49(a), Tax Code, is amended to read 6-65 as follows: 6-66 (a)AAExcept as provided by Subsection (b), a taxing unit is 6-67 not liable in a suit to collect taxes for court costs, including any 6-68 fees for service of process or electronic filing, an attorney ad 6-69 litem, arbitration, or mediation, and may not be required to post

6 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 7-1 security for costs. 7-2 SECTIONA13.AASection 41.45, Tax Code, is amended by adding 7-3 Subsection (n) to read as follows: 7-4 (n)AAA property owner does not waive the right to appear in 7-5 person at the protest hearing by submitting an affidavit to the 7-6 appraisal review board. The board may consider the affidavit only 7-7 if the property owner does not appear at the protest hearing in 7-8 person. For purposes of scheduling the hearing, the property owner 7-9 shall state in the affidavit that the property owner does not intend 7-10 to appear at the hearing or that the property owner intends to 7-11 appear at the hearing and that the affidavit may be used only if the 7-12 property owner does not appear at the hearing. If the property 7-13 owner does not state in the affidavit whether the owner intends to 7-14 appear at the hearing, the board shall consider the submission of 7-15 the affidavit as an indication that the property owner does not 7-16 intend to appear at the hearing. If the property owner states in 7-17 the affidavit that the owner does not intend to appear at the 7-18 hearing or does not state in the affidavit whether the owner intends 7-19 to appear at the hearing, the appraisal review board is not required 7-20 to consider the affidavit at the scheduled hearing and may consider 7-21 the affidavit at a hearing designated for the specific purpose of 7-22 processing affidavits. 7-23 SECTIONA14.AASection 41.66, Tax Code, is amended by adding 7-24 Subsections (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), and (o) to read as 7-25 follows: 7-26 (i)AAA hearing on a protest filed by a property owner who is 7-27 not represented by an agent designated under Section 1.111 shall be 7-28 set for a time and date certain. If the hearing is not commenced 7-29 within two hours of the time set for the hearing, the appraisal 7-30 review board shall postpone the hearing on the request of the 7-31 property owner. 7-32 (j)AAOn the request of a property owner or a designated 7-33 agent, an appraisal review board shall schedule hearings on 7-34 protests concerning up to 20 designated properties on the same day. 7-35 The designated properties must be identified in the same notice of 7-36 protest, and the notice must contain in boldfaced type the 7-37 statement "request for same-day protest hearings." A property 7-38 owner or designated agent may not file more than one request under 7-39 this subsection with the appraisal review board in the same tax 7-40 year. The appraisal review board may schedule hearings on protests 7-41 concerning more than 20 properties filed by the same property owner 7-42 or designated agent and may use different panels to conduct the 7-43 hearings based on the board ’s customary scheduling. The appraisal 7-44 review board may follow the practices customarily used by the board 7-45 in the scheduling of hearings under this subsection. 7-46 (k)AAIf an appraisal review board sits in panels to conduct 7-47 protest hearings, protests shall be randomly assigned to panels, 7-48 except that the board may consider the type of property subject to 7-49 the protest or the ground of the protest for the purpose of using 7-50 the expertise of a particular panel in hearing protests regarding 7-51 particular types of property or based on particular grounds. If a 7-52 protest is scheduled to be heard by a particular panel, the protest 7-53 may not be reassigned to another panel without the consent of the 7-54 property owner or designated agent. If the appraisal review board 7-55 has cause to reassign a protest to another panel, a property owner 7-56 or designated agent may agree to reassignment of the protest or may 7-57 request that the hearing on the protest be postponed. The board 7-58 shall postpone the hearing on that request. A change of members of 7-59 a panel because of a conflict of interest, illness, or inability to 7-60 continue participating in hearings for the remainder of the day 7-61 does not constitute reassignment of a protest to another panel. 7-62 (l)AAA property owner, attorney, or agent offering evidence 7-63 or argument in support of a protest brought under Section 7-64 41.41(a)(1) or (2) of this code is not subject to Chapter 1103, 7-65 Occupations Code, unless the person offering the evidence or 7-66 argument states that the person is offering evidence or argument as 7-67 a person holding a license or certificate under Chapter 1103, 7-68 Occupations Code. A person holding a license or certificate under 7-69 Chapter 1103, Occupations Code, shall state the capacity in which

7 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 8-1 the person is appearing before the appraisal review board. 8-2 (m)AAAn appraisal district or appraisal review board may not 8-3 make decisions with regard to membership on a panel or chairmanship 8-4 of a panel based on a member ’s voting record in previous protests. 8-5 (n)AAA request for postponement of a hearing must contain the 8-6 mailing address and e-mail address of the person requesting the 8-7 postponement. An appraisal review board shall respond in writing 8-8 or by e-mail to a request for postponement of a hearing not later 8-9 than the seventh day after the date of receipt of the request. 8-10 (o)AAThe chairman of an appraisal review board or a member 8-11 designated by the chairman may make decisions with regard to the 8-12 scheduling or postponement of a hearing. The chief appraiser or a 8-13 person designated by the chief appraiser may agree to a 8-14 postponement of an appraisal review board hearing. 8-15 SECTIONA15.AASection 41A.03(a), Tax Code, is amended to read 8-16 as follows: 8-17 (a)AATo appeal an appraisal review board order under this 8-18 chapter, a property owner must file with the appraisal district not 8-19 later than the 45th day after the date the property owner receives 8-20 notice of the order: 8-21 (1)AAa completed request for binding arbitration under 8-22 this chapter in the form prescribed by Section 41A.04; and 8-23 (2)AAan arbitration deposit made payable to the 8-24 comptroller in the amount of[: 8-25 [(A)]AA$500[; or 8-26 [(B)AA$250, if the property owner requests 8-27 expedited arbitration under Section 41A.031]. 8-28 SECTIONA16.AASections 42.08(b), (b-1), and (c), Tax Code, 8-29 are amended to read as follows: 8-30 (b)AAExcept as provided in Subsection (d), a property owner 8-31 who appeals as provided by this chapter must pay taxes on the 8-32 property subject to the appeal in the amount required by this 8-33 subsection before the delinquency date or the property owner 8-34 forfeits the right to proceed to a final determination of the 8-35 appeal. The amount of taxes the property owner must pay on the 8-36 property before the delinquency date to comply with this subsection 8-37 is the lesser of: 8-38 (1)AAthe amount of taxes due on the portion of the 8-39 taxable value of the property that is not in dispute; [or] 8-40 (2)AAthe amount of taxes due on the property under the 8-41 order from which the appeal is taken; or 8-42 (3)AAthe amount of taxes imposed on the property in the 8-43 preceding tax year. 8-44 (b-1)AAThis subsection applies only to an appeal in which the 8-45 property owner elects to pay the amount of taxes described by 8-46 Subsection (b)(1).AAThe appeal filed by the property owner must be 8-47 accompanied by a statement in writing of the amount of taxes the 8-48 property owner proposes to pay. The failure to provide the 8-49 statement required by this subsection is not a jurisdictional 8-50 error. 8-51 (c)AAA property owner that pays an amount of taxes greater 8-52 than that required by Subsection (b) does not forfeit the property 8-53 owner ’s right to a final determination of the appeal by making the 8-54 payment. The property owner may pay an additional amount of taxes 8-55 at any time. If the property owner files a timely appeal under this 8-56 chapter, taxes paid on the property are considered paid under 8-57 protest, even if paid before the appeal is filed. If the taxes are 8-58 subject to the split-payment option provided by Section 31.03, the 8-59 property owner may comply with Subsection (b) of this section by 8-60 paying one-half of the amount otherwise required to be paid under 8-61 that subsection before December 1 and paying the remaining one-half 8-62 of that amount before July 1 of the following year. 8-63 SECTIONA17.AASection 42.21, Tax Code, is amended by adding 8-64 Subsections (f), (g), and (h) to read as follows: 8-65 (f)AAA petition filed by an owner or lessee of property may 8-66 include multiple properties that are owned or leased by the same 8-67 person and are of a similar type or are part of the same economic 8-68 unit and would typically sell as a single property. If a petition 8-69 is filed by multiple plaintiffs or includes multiple properties

8 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 9-1 that are not of a similar type, are not part of the same economic 9-2 unit, or are part of the same economic unit but would not typically 9-3 sell as a single property, the court may on motion and a showing of 9-4 good cause sever the plaintiffs or the properties. 9-5 (g)AAA petition filed by an owner or lessee of property may be 9-6 amended to include additional properties in the same county that 9-7 are owned or leased by the same person, are of a similar type as the 9-8 property originally involved in the appeal or are part of the same 9-9 economic unit as the property originally involved in the appeal and 9-10 would typically sell as a single property, and are the subject of an 9-11 appraisal review board order issued in the same year as the order 9-12 that is the subject of the original appeal. The amendment must be 9-13 filed within the period during which a petition for review of the 9-14 appraisal review board order pertaining to the additional 9-15 properties would be required to be filed under Subsection (a). 9-16 (h)AAThe court has jurisdiction over an appeal under this 9-17 chapter brought on behalf of a property owner or lessee and the 9-18 owner or lessee is considered to have exhausted the owner ’s or 9-19 lessee ’s administrative remedies regardless of whether the 9-20 petition correctly identifies the plaintiff as the owner or lessee 9-21 of the property or correctly describes the property so long as the 9-22 property was the subject of an appraisal review board order, the 9-23 petition was filed within the period required by Subsection (a), 9-24 and the petition provides sufficient information to identify the 9-25 property that is the subject of the petition. Whether the plaintiff 9-26 is the proper party to bring the petition or whether the property 9-27 needs to be further identified or described must be addressed by 9-28 means of a special exception and correction of the petition by 9-29 amendment as authorized by Subsection (e) and may not be the subject 9-30 of a plea to the jurisdiction or a claim that the plaintiff has 9-31 failed to exhaust the plaintiff ’s administrative remedies. If the 9-32 petition is amended to add a plaintiff, the court on motion shall 9-33 enter a docket control order to provide proper deadlines in 9-34 response to the addition of the plaintiff. 9-35 SECTIONA18.AASection 42.23, Tax Code, is amended by adding 9-36 Subsection (h) to read as follows: 9-37 (h)AAEvidence, argument, or other testimony offered at an 9-38 appraisal review board hearing by a property owner or agent is not 9-39 admissible in an appeal under this chapter unless: 9-40 (1)AAthe evidence, argument, or other testimony is 9-41 offered to demonstrate that there is sufficient evidence to deny a 9-42 no-evidence motion for summary judgment filed by a party to the 9-43 appeal or is necessary for the determination of the merits of a 9-44 motion for summary judgment filed on another ground; 9-45 (2)AAthe property owner or agent is designated as a 9-46 witness for purposes of trial and the testimony offered at the 9-47 appraisal review board hearing is offered for impeachment purposes; 9-48 or 9-49 (3)AAthe evidence is the plaintiff ’s testimony at the 9-50 appraisal review board hearing as to the value of the property. 9-51 SECTIONA19.AASection 42.29(a), Tax Code, is amended to read 9-52 as follows: 9-53 (a)AAA property owner who prevails in an appeal to the court 9-54 under Section 42.25 or 42.26, [or] in an appeal to the court of a 9-55 determination of an appraisal review board on a motion filed under 9-56 Section 25.25, or in an appeal to the court of a determination of an 9-57 appraisal review board of a protest of the denial in whole or in 9-58 part of an exemption under Section 11.17, 11.22, 11.23, 11.231, or 9-59 11.24 may be awarded reasonable attorney ’s fees.AAThe amount of the 9-60 award may not exceed the greater of: 9-61 (1)AA$15,000; or 9-62 (2)AA20 percent of the total amount by which the 9-63 property owner ’s tax liability is reduced as a result of the appeal. 9-64 SECTIONA20.AASection 41A.031, Tax Code, is repealed. 9-65 SECTIONA21.AAThe changes in law made by this Act apply to a 9-66 proceeding that is pending on the effective date of this Act or is 9-67 filed on or after the effective date of this Act. 9-68 SECTIONA22.AASection 6.035, Tax Code, as amended by this Act, 9-69 does not affect the eligibility of an individual serving on an

9 C.S.H.B.ANo.A585 10-1 appraisal district board of directors immediately before the 10-2 effective date of this Act to continue to serve on the appraisal 10-3 district board of directors for the term to which the member was 10-4 appointed. 10-5 SECTIONA23.AA(a) As soon as practicable on or after January 10-6 1, 2014, the local administrative district judge or the judge ’s 10-7 designee in a county described by Section 6.41(d-1), Tax Code, as 10-8 amended by this Act, in the manner provided by Section 6.41, Tax 10-9 Code, shall appoint the members of the appraisal review board for 10-10 the appraisal district established in the county. In making the 10-11 initial appointments, the judge or judge ’s designee shall designate 10-12 those members who serve terms of one year as necessary to comply 10-13 with Section 6.41(e), Tax Code. 10-14 (b)AAThe changes made to Section 6.41, Tax Code, by this Act 10-15 apply only to the appointment of appraisal review board members to 10-16 terms beginning on or after January 1, 2014. This Act does not 10-17 affect the term of an appraisal review board member serving on 10-18 December 31, 2013, if the member was appointed before January 1, 10-19 2014, to a term that began before December 31, 2013, and expires 10-20 December 31, 2014. 10-21 SECTIONA24.AASection 6.411, Tax Code, as amended by this Act, 10-22 applies only to an offense committed on or after the effective date 10-23 of this Act. An offense committed before the effective date of this 10-24 Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was 10-25 committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that 10-26 purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense was committed 10-27 before the effective date of this Act if any element of the offense 10-28 occurred before that date. 10-29 SECTIONA25.AASections 22.01 and 22.24, Tax Code, as amended 10-30 by this Act, apply only to the rendition of property for ad valorem 10-31 tax purposes for a tax year that begins on or after January 1, 2014. 10-32 SECTIONA26.AA(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of 10-33 this section: 10-34 (1)AAthis Act takes effect immediately if it receives a 10-35 vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as 10-36 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution; and 10-37 (2)AAif this Act does not receive the vote necessary for 10-38 immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2013. 10-39 (b)AASections 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 13, 14, and 25 of this Act take 10-40 effect January 1, 2014.

10-41 * * * * *

10 TAB 6 Ê

cAusE No.20t2-34688 n Fsrl HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT,

Plaintiff, v 55Ih JUDICIAL DISTRICT

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, ef .al, HARRTS COUNTY, TEXAS -u Defendants. 3 ¡nl ÐeN\ut l,- F,e 5ü LÈ.o= oRDER Cn¡W+I¡¡G OnrnnUnXtS' nnotton *O* *-9 Pã SUMMARY JUDGM.ENT Il -:o F RcEås olr sÌ h o 5öo Fq The Court considered the Texas V/orkforce Commission's (TìWC) Motion for e Ë'i* sO,l .c(Ec> ìoxr¡Joo Summary Judgment and Harris County Appraisal Districts (HCAD) Amended Motion for

Summary Judgment in the above-referenced cause. HCAD challenged TWC

administrative decisions regarding unemployment benefits claims filed by the T\ilC's co-

defendants by seeking judicial review under the substantial evidence trial de novo

standard of review.

aCr\MrF - After considering the summary judgment evidence and arguments presented, the srha¡i/r Court fìndsidfavonof the TWC and a^ffilme the TWC's decisions.

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AI\D DECREED that the Ðø n l¿ ro. TWC's Motion for Summary Judgment is ion

f Wo.kfer

ffiiîilïi:ti,ffii3jli

Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

864 $4,v, S wÅ^t' -N rt/.,/ All costs shall be borne by the lncurfl lslsa

disposing of all claims and all parties. All

SIGNED this day, fv\w I ,2014 WN

U

JU ING

) Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

865 4t14t20't4 5 38 01 PM Chfls Danrel - Drslflct Clerk Harns County Envelope No 991336 By JONATHAN PATTON

cAusE No.2012-34688

IIARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL $ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DISTRICT, $

Plaintiff, $ $ 1) $ lv vs. $ HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS $ TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSTON $ ct. al, $ $ Defendant $ 55TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER

On the day of 2014, the Courl heard the Amended l{arris

County r\ppraisal District's Motion for Sumrnary Judgment and the Court, having considercd thc

Motion, Rcsponses and arguments of counsel is of the opinion that the Motion should, in all

things, bc GRANTED. It is therefore.

ORDERED that the Harris County Appraisal District's Amended Motion for Summary

Judgment is hereby GRANTED.

SIGNED and entered on this íauv or ¡Àr.r,.,¡- ,2014 U

Presiding

866 TAB 7 Weistlaw V.T.C.A., Labor Code S 212.201 Page 1

c Effective: ISee Text Amendmentsl

Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness Labor Code (Refs & Annos) Title 4. Employment Services and Unemployment Subtitle A. Texas Unemployment Compensation Act Rtâ Chapter 212. Dispute Resolution ÑEl SubchaDter E. Judicial Review of Commission Decision '+'+ $ 212.201. Commencement of Judicial Review; Defendants (a) A party aggrieved by a final decision of the commission may obtain judicial review of the decision by bringing an action in a court of competent jurisdiction for review of the decision against the commission on or after the date on which the decision is final, and not later than the 14th day after that date.

(b) Each other party to the proceeding before the commission must be made a defendant in an action under this sub- chapter.

cREDTT(S)

Acts 1993. 73rd Leg., ch. 269. I 1. eff. Sep!. l. 1993.

Current through the end of the 2011 Regular Session and First Called Session of the 82nd Legislature

(c) 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

END OF DOCUMENT

@2012 Thornson Reuters. No Clairn to Orig. US Gov. Works TAB 8 Westlaw V.T.C.A., Labor Code ç 212.202 Page I

c Effective: June 20, 2003

Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness --Labor Code (Refs & Annos) Title 4. Employment Services and Unemployment Subtitle A. Texas Unemployment Compensation Act ÑEl Chapter 212. Dispute Resolution \B Subchapter E. Judicial Review of Commission Decision '+'+ S 212.202. Standard of Judicial Review; Exceptions Not Necessary (a) Judicial review under this subchapter is by trial de novo based on the substantial evidence rule.

(b) It is not necessary in a judicial proceeding under this subchapter to enter exceptions to the rulings of the com- mission.

Acts 1993. 73rd Leg.. ch. 269. I 1. eff. Sept. l. 1993. Amended by Acts 2003.781h Leg.. ch. 1208. $ 1. eff. June 20. 2003.

Current through the end of the 2011 Regular Session and First Called Session of the 82nd Legislature

(c)2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

@2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. TAB 9 We'stlaw V.T.C.A., Labor Code $ 201.041 Page 1

c Effective: [See Text Amendments]

Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness Labor Code (Refs & Annos) Title 4. Employment Services and Unemployment Subtitle A. Texas Unemployment Compensation Act \E Chapter 201. Unemployment Compensation Act--General Provisions $l Subchapter D. Definition of Employment -+-+ $ 201.041. General Definition of Employment

In this subtitle, "employment" means a service, including service in interstate commerce, performed by an individual for wages or under an express or implied contract of hire, unless it is shown to the satisfaction of the commission that the individual's performance of the service has been and will continue to be free from control or direction under the contract and in fact.

Acts 1993, 73rdLeg., ch.269, $ 1, eff. Sept. l, 1993

REVISOR'S NOTE

2006 Main Volume

The source law refers to a "written or oral, express or implied" confact. The reference to "written or oral" is omitted from the revised law because "written or oral" is included within the meaning of "express."

HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws

Acts 1936, 44fhLeg.,3rd C.S., p.1993, ch.482, $ 19

@ 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. V.T.C.A., Labor Code $ 201.041 Page2

Acts 1937 , 45thLeg., p. 121, ch. 67, $ 7

Acts 1939, 46thLeg., p.436, $ 10

Acts 1941, 47thLeg., p. 1378, ch. 625, $ 1

Acts 1943, 48th Leg., p. 585, ch. 343, $ 7

ActS 1945, 49thLeg., p. 589, ch.347, $ 7

Acts 1949, 5lst Leg., p.282, ch. 148, $ 8.

Acts 1955, 54thLeg.,p.399, ch. 116, $ 13

Acts 1957, 55th Leg., p. 1350, ch. 460, $ I I

Acts 1961, 57thLeg.,p.1129, ch. 513, $ 2

Acts 1965,59th Leg., p. 318, ch. 150, $ 6.

Acts 1967,60th Leg., p. 697, ch. 287, $ 8.

Acts 1971,62ndLeg.,p.2738,ch.892, $$ 10, 1l

Acts 797'7,65th Leg., p.994, ch. 368, $$ l5 to 19

Acts 1979,661h Leg., p. 384, ch. 175

Acts 1981, 61thLeg., p. 17, ch. 12, S2

Acts 1982, 67thLeg.,3rd C.S., p. 2, ch. 2, $ 5

Acts 1983,68th Leg., p.2877, ch.489, $ 1

Acrs l985,69thLeg., ch.67, $$ 1,2.

Acts 1985,69th Leg., ch. 385, $ I

Acts 1991,72ndLeg., ch. 812, $ I

A2U4 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works V.T.C.A., Labor Code $ 201.041 Page 3

Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5221b-17(gX1 ).

LIBRARY REFERENCES

Unemployment Compensat ion G 1 6, 29 Westlãw Topic No. 392T. '

RESEARCH REFERENCES

2014 Electronic Pocket Part Update

Encyclopedias

103 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d l, Proving Independent Contractor Status in Challenging Unemployment Insurance and Vy'orkers' Compensation Assessments.

TX Jur. 3d Employer and Employee $ 389, Employment Defined.

NOTES OF DECISIONS

In general I Independent contractors 2 Review 3

1. In general

An "employer" is obligated to contribute to the unemployment compensation fund "on wages for employment paid," in accordance with rules adopted by the Texas Vy'orkforce Cofnmission. Critical Health Connection, Inc. v. Texas lùy'orkforce Com'n (App. 3 Dist.201l) 338 S.V/.3d 758. Taxation C:;Þ:ZSt(t)

Medical service providers, whom medical staffing company referred to its client hospitals and nursing homes in order to fulfill their short-term staffìng needs, were "employees," rather than independent contractors, under Workforce Commission's "right-to-control" test and thus, company was required to contribute on their behalf to unemployment compensation fund; providers did not share in any profits or losses or otherwise invest in company's business, and once a provider accepted a shift with a client, she was provided equipment necessary to complete assignment and had no discretion about when or where work would be performed. Critical Health Connection, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Com'n (App. 3 Dist. 2011) 338 S.V/.3d 758. Taxation C=4328S

A 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. V.T.C.A., Labor Code $ 201.041 Page 4

Testimony of corporate officers that salesperson was free of direction and control and that she could have hired someone to perform her duties was substantial evidence that her services did not qualifl as employment for purposes of unemployment compensation. Dozier v. Texas Employment Com'n (App. 14 Dist. 2001) 4l S.W.3d 304. Unem- ployment Compensation æ403

The definition of "employment", in statute presupposes remuneration for such services. State v. Kenyon, Inc (Civ.App. l94l) 153 S.W.2d 195, error refused.

Where in a suit by the Unemployment Compensation Commission, under statute, nothing showed either a payment of wages or services performed under a contract df hire, the commission could not rest its case solely upon the fact that the company failed to make any showing that the services involved did not constitute employment under the act. Op.Atty.Gen. 1939, No. 0-1 337.

Where an owner of a department store leased a department within store, individuals employed to perform services in leased department are wjthin employment of lessor within meaning of term "employment" as used in Texas Unem- ployment Compensation Act. Op.Atty .Gen.1942, No. 0-42 12.

2. Independent contractors

Where owner of motor carrier business hired truck drivers and paid each driver 25o/o commission on gross revenue of truck he drove and paid all expenses ofoperating truck and bore all losses when they occurred, and where under art. 9l lb and rules promulgated by Railroad Commission, owner was compelled to retain control of trucks and drivers and drivers had no legal authority to operate trucks as independent contractors, truck drivers were employees and not independent contractors and owner was required to contribute to state unemployment compensation fund. Johnston v. State (Civ.App.1957) 303 S.V/.2d 520,ref.n,r.e. Taxation Þ¡ZgS

Persons doing insect extemination work were "employees" for whom their employer was required to remit unem- ployment taxes and were not "independent contractors" where operator of the business made all basic decisions, what equipment would be used, what chemicals were to be applied, prices to be charged, advertising to be done, what insurance would be carried, and how deferred payments would be carried, and two of three classes of workmen re- ceived salaries while third class was paid according to work done. Merchant v. State (Civ.App. 1964)379 5.W.2d924. Taxation C;;}:zss

Insurance adjusters were independent contractors, where work done by adjusters required some special skill, they had their own clients, they did their own work without direction from adjusting business, they kept their own hours, they were not paid on a claim file until work was done on file and they were not carried on social security and income tax withholding rolls of adjusting business, and thus adjusting business was not liable for unemployment taxes. Bamett v. Texas Employment Commission (Civ.App. ß7$ 510 S.W.2d 361,ref. n.r.e. Taxation C;;a32gt

3. Review

@ 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. V.T.C.A., Labor Code $ 201.041 Page 5

Upon judicial review, presuming substantial evidence and indulging all inferences in favor of Texas Workforce Commission's discretion, it takes very little evidence to overcome the presumption of employment, for purposes of determining entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits. Dozier v. Texas Employment Com'n (App. l4 Dist. 200 1) 4 1 S.W.3d 3 04. Unemployment Compensatio n G +gS (Z)

V. T. C. 4., Labor Code $ 201.041, TX LABOR $ 201.041

Current through the end of the 2013 Third Called Session of the 83rd Legislature

(C)2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works

@ 2014 Tholnson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works TAB 10 We.stlaw 40 TAC $ 821.5 Page I

Tex. Admin. Code tit.40, $ 821.5

c -r.f S 821.5. Employment Status: Em- ployee or Independent Contractor Texas Administrative Code Currentness Title 40. Social Services and Assistance The Commission adopts the following form, Form P art 20. Texas Workforce Commission C-8, as its off,icial guideline for use in determining Chapter 821. Texas Payday Rules employment status. Ñtä Subchapter A. General Provisions

A2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works 40 TAC $ 821.5 Page2

Figure: 40 TAC $821.5

EMPLOYMENT STATUS- A COMPARATNTE APPROACH U¡rder tlre common law test, aworker is an employee if the Depending upo¡r üre type ofbuiness ad thc scrviccs prchaser of thar uorker's service h6 fhe rigùt o direct or pcrfornred, not all Ð commsr law factorc may apply. ln addition, conBol the worker, both asto the f¡nal results and as to the tÞ weiglt assigned to a specif¡c fætor may vary depøding on the deteils ofwlæû wlrcre, and howtlre umrk isdone. Connol need facts ofthe cas¿. rþt actually bc cxcrciscd; rathcr, if lhc scrrict rccipicnt has thc If an cmploymcnt rclatiorship cxists, itdoes not malærthat rEåf to contol, qrployment may þ shown. tlæ employee iscallod something dift¡ent, such as agcng conract laborer, subconræror, or indepcndent contractor.

r. INSTRUCTIONS: rI. ORALOR IVRITTENREPORTS: An Employee receives ¡nsmrct¡ons abottt when, whcre and ,4r¡ Employ€Ê nay be required tD sr¡bmit ¡egular oral or how tlæ wo¡k is to be performed. wntten reports about the work in pogæs, An h&pen&nlContrætç dæs tlcl'ob hßor her ownway ,4n In&pendem Cot*ætor ß usuolþ rct requlred to flbmll withfen, iÍØry, inttrt ctionl as ,o üp details or netløds of regular orul orvrittenrepoßabod lhe wæh h progræs. the'worft 2. TRAINING: 12. PAYMENT BYTHE HOUR, IVEEKOR MONTH: Ernployees are oflcn tained by a more experienced An Bnployee is typically paid þ ûe employer in rcgular a nployec or aterequircd to aíetd meetings or take ûaining amoùrls al statcd inærvals, snch æ by tlæ how or wec*. coì¡fses. Àn ltdepet&nt Connacør ts numally paid by the job, ,4n l¡*pendettt Contactor uw his or her own tnerhd¡ eitheranegofiatedflat røø or tpn nbntssian ofa btd ad tlt¿rs wed not receite tøinitgfron the pvclwser of ilpse æniæs, 3. INTEGRATIOFI: 13. PAYMEMOFBUSINESS &TRAVELÐOFÀSE: Scrvices of an Employec are rsully møged into the lirm's An Employer's bsinæs ar¡d travcl expcrscs are either paid overall operation; tlæ firm's succcs depends on those directly or rcimbursed by thc employer. Ernployee services. Independentcontroetors tromølly pay all of their own An lt&pø&nt Cøta clot's s¿mieesøe unnlly sepale business atd lrayel acpenses witlrrul reimbwsemeú. ftøn ile client's business atd a¡e wl integÍaled or merged inlo ll. 4. SERVICES PF.PSfINÀI T,Y: r¡ FllnNlslrrNlìTfnt.s B(XIIPMENT: An Employee's ærvices mrm be rendered pe¡'sonalþ; Ernployees are ñmished all necessary tools, materials and Employees do rnl hire their own substitutes or delegae cquipment by dæir cmployer. worlc to them. An IndeperùntContrætor ordlmrilypor:tdes all of tle .,4 true Wpn&il Contætot ß able to assign atntler to tools ød equtpntent necesw? to ca nplete tlc job. dotlre joÞ inhß or lwplæeandtxedrctprfæn æmices personally. 5. HIRING. & PAYINGIfEI,PER^S: 15. SIGNIFICANT IIWESIMENT: An Employee may e.aasa fo¡e¡nan for the cnploye¡ buÈ if An Ernployce gcncrally has little orno invest¡nent in tl¡e so, hclpcrsarc paid widr thccmploycr's funds. business. Instead an Ernployee is economirally dcprdent húpn&nt &rwactors ælect, hire, pøy ærd stqewße oty on dæ employer. helpers rred øú øe responsible îor the resia of the Trae lrúrytúent Contrætors uwally lwe a stbstantial lclps'lahor. litwtial ilntesonent in trpir ind¿pettdent busitæss. 6^ COI{TINUING tÁ. w'.Ârf7.r pRof'rT flR An Employee oîcn continues to work for the same An Ernployee docs not ordinarily realize a profrt or loss employer rnonth aûer month oryearafter yea. in tl¡c busincss. Rathcr, Employees are paid for services An Indepen&n Cøtaetor is trsralþ hired lo one job ú of rendeæd. llnìted or indefrnìte dú'atiaß @d llas no speclaliø ot Ån Indepetderu Cowræør can either realize a profit ø cot linuing work ntfer a loss dependrg on the mûngemem of apenses ø¡drew¡nzs, 7. SETTI(XJRSOFÌVORIC 17. WORKING FORMORE TÍIAN ONE FIRIUAT A TIII& *on An Employee may work call" or during hours and days An Employee ordinarily works for one ernployø at a time as set þ the anployer. and may be prolribited frun joining a competitor. Å tae Independent Contræto¡ ìs the masler olhts or her An Independen Cowractor oftenworltîq more thætone own time ød works tlc doys od hovs he or slæ cløoses. client or Jìrm at the sat te tiilr4 and is ruit subject to a non- comrytit¡on rule.

@2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 40 TAC S 821.5 Page 3

Tex. Admin. Code tit. 40, $ 821.5

8. FI'LLÎIME REQI,IIRDD: I& MÁKTNG SERWCE AVAII.¡IßLE TO THE PUBLIC: An Employce ordinarily devoæs frrll-li¡nc service to the An Ernploycc docs not rnake his or hcr serviccs availablc ûo employer, or tlre employer may have a priority on thc the public cxcepl through tln employer's company. Empþcc'stimc. An ltúependen Corwactor nøy dvertise, cøry busi¡css A næ lr&pedentCqtætorcanpt Þ reguirdødewte cards, høtg ow a shingle or løId a seryate buslncss full-nme cmice lo otæ fitm exchuiveþ. licenæ. 9. IOCATION }VHERE PËRFORMED: 19. RIGIIT TO DISCTT,IRGE 1VITIIOUT LTABILITYI Ernploymentis indic¿¡ed if the ønployerhæthe rigÛttto An Employee can be discharged at any time \r'ithoü liab¡l¡ty mandate where serviccs arc pcrformed on tlre employer's part. hdepúen Connætors ordimrily worhwhere tlæy Iltleworkmeels tlæ contræt terms, at lndependent cløose. The væþlæe nay be mcyfrmt ilæ client's Corûætor comot be fired without ltability for breæh S premlses conErrcl, sf"T: æ. RIGfff TOQUTT }VüH@TIIAB&IIIY: An Eraptoyee perforns senices in tlæ ordø or seguence set An Employee may quitwork at any time withor* liabilityon by tlæ cmployer. This shows conbol by lÞ employer. the Employcc's part. A t.e lr&pcúerrt CanÞactø is corcenæd onþ with Iæ An ln&pendent Cotnæw is legalþ r*pottsiblefor job tìnßhed prodtat ûnd se¡s hìs æ t êr øttn ortler or *Eence complelion and, on quitlir;ry., beconesliablefor breach ot olwork canttlcr. C-8(94) Inv. No 51t975

Source: The provisions ofthis $ 821.5 adopted to be effective June l, 1998,23 TexReg 5732; amended to be effective March 13,2007,32 TexReg 1328.

40 TAC $ 821.5, 40 TX ADC $ 821.5

Current through August 31, 2012

Copr. (C) 2012. All rights reserved.

@2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.