The Tampa Gas Company v. Sparkman

14 So. 2d 196, 153 Fla. 177, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 580
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 So. 2d 196 (The Tampa Gas Company v. Sparkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Tampa Gas Company v. Sparkman, 14 So. 2d 196, 153 Fla. 177, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 580 (Fla. 1943).

Opinion

ADAMS, J.:

Section 34, Chapter 20723, Acts 1941, provides;

“Any person who fails to make a tax return as required *178 by this Act shall pay as a penalty, in addition to and as part of the tax a sum equal to 10% of the tax found to be due. . .”

On petition for certiorari under Rule 34 we review an order of the lower court upholding the statute. The question is whether the quoted part of the statute is in contravention of Sec. 1 of Art. IX, Constitution of Florida, Sec. 12, Declaration of Rights, Constitution of Florida, or Sec. 1 of XIV Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

The Legislature shall provide sufficient revenue to defray the expenses of the State. Sec. 2, Art. IX, Constitution of Florida. Pursuant to such duty the Legislature shall provide a uniform and equal rate of taxation based upon a just valuation. Sec. 1, Art. IX, Florida Constitution. These mandatory duties invest the Legislature with power to levy taxes and such power necessarily carries the power to fix reasonable penalties to insure the collection of same.

Petitioner relies on our opinion, Colonial Inv. Co. v. Nolan, 100 Fla. 1349, 131 So. 178.

Here, a different case is presented. The penalty does not augment the valuation. It is imposed for neglect to perform a duty. The Legislature may require the owners of property to return their property for taxation. The property owner may avoid the penalty by discharging his lawful duty. So long as the penalty is not unreasonable or arbitrary it will be upheld.

We find the challenged statute not in conflict with the State or Federal Constitution, hence petition for certiorari is denied.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DOMINION LAND & T. CORP. v. Department of Revenue
320 So. 2d 815 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Mariani v. Schleman
94 So. 2d 829 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 2d 196, 153 Fla. 177, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-tampa-gas-company-v-sparkman-fla-1943.