The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

Fifth Circuit

The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

316 F.2d 929, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5238

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1963

Docket20521

StatusPublished

This text of 316 F.2d 929 (The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 316 F.2d 929, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5238 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

*930 PER CURIAM.

This is a motion by Petitioner for a stay of an order denying its application for rehearing of the Federal Power Commission’s opinions 382 and 382A, issued March 15, 1963 and April 26, 1963, ordering a certain refund to El Paso Natural Gas Company.

It appearing that an earlier petition to review these orders has been filed by other parties in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and that the within petition to review will be consolidated with that pending in the Third Circuit, and it appearing that the Court there has heretofore denied a similar motion to stay the said orders, and movant having failed to satisfy the requirement that in such a case it must be shown that a denial of the stay would cause irreparable injury to movant, the said motion to stay is hereby

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*930 PER CURIAM.

This is a motion by Petitioner for a stay of an order denying its application for rehearing of the Federal Power Commission’s opinions 382 and 382A, issued March 15, 1963 and April 26, 1963, ordering a certain refund to El Paso Natural Gas Company.

It appearing that an earlier petition to review these orders has been filed by other parties in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and that the within petition to review will be consolidated with that pending in the Third Circuit, and it appearing that the Court there has heretofore denied a similar motion to stay the said orders, and movant having failed to satisfy the requirement that in such a case it must be shown that a denial of the stay would cause irreparable injury to movant, the said motion to stay is hereby

Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 F.2d 929, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-superior-oil-company-v-federal-power-commission-ca5-1963.