the Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as Trustees for the Stromback Living Trust v. Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 2009
Docket03-08-00223-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as Trustees for the Stromback Living Trust v. Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company (the Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as Trustees for the Stromback Living Trust v. Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as Trustees for the Stromback Living Trust v. Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00223-CV

The Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as trustees for the Stromback Living Trust, Appellants

v.

Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-004116, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants’ brief was due in this Court on November 5, 2008 and is overdue. If an

appellant fails to file a brief, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the

appellant reasonably explains the failure and appellee is not significantly injured by that failure. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). On December 11, 2008, we sent notice to appellants that their brief was

overdue and that the appeal may be dismissed if appellants did not submit a proper motion to this

Court on or before December 22, 2008. To date, no brief or motion for extension of time has been

filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 27, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the Stromback Living Trust and Gustav M. Stromback and Viva M. Stromback, Individually and as Trustees for the Stromback Living Trust v. Palo Petroleum, Inc. and Indigo Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-stromback-living-trust-and-gustav-m-stromback-and-viva-m-stromback-texapp-2009.