The Stern Company of Washington, Inc. v. Panos George

D.C. Circuit

The Stern Company of Washington, Inc. v. Panos George

253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3944

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1958

Docket13984_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 F.2d 867 (The Stern Company of Washington, Inc. v. Panos George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Stern Company of Washington, Inc. v. Panos George, 253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3944 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil action for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and damages for conversion. Upon trial without a jury the District Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, dissolved an outstanding preliminary injunction, and rendered a money judgment for the plaintiff. The controversy revolves about personal property subject to a chattel deed of trust. This property was used in a restaurant. It was replaced with other, new property subject to a conditional sales contract. The old property passed to the possession of the supplier of the new property.

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil action for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and damages for conversion. Upon trial without a jury the District Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, dissolved an outstanding preliminary injunction, and rendered a money judgment for the plaintiff. The controversy revolves about personal property subject to a chattel deed of trust. This property was used in a restaurant. It was replaced with other, new property subject to a conditional sales contract. The old property passed to the possession of the supplier of the new property.

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-stern-company-of-washington-inc-v-panos-george-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack