The" Sterling" and The" Equator"

Supreme Court

The" Sterling" and The" Equator"

106 U.S. 647, 1 S. Ct. 89, 27 L. Ed. 98, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1597

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 18, 1882

Docket49

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 106 U.S. 647 (The" Sterling" and The" Equator") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The" Sterling" and The" Equator", 106 U.S. 647, 1 S. Ct. 89, 27 L. Ed. 98, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1597 (1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in admiralty against the ship “ Sterling ” and tow-boat “ Equator,” for damages sustained by the bark “ Sif ” in a collision. Both the ship and tow-boat were found to be in fault, and they were condemned in solido for the whole amount of the' loss. From a decree to that effect this appeal was taken.

It is conceded that upon the facts found the owners of the “ Sif ” are entitled to a decree against the ship and the towboat, as both were in fault. The well-established rule in such cases- is to apportion the damages equally between the two offending vessels, the right being reserved to the libellant to colléct the entire amount from either of them to the extent of her stipulated value, in case of the inability of the other to respond for her portion.. The Washington and The Gregory, 9 Wall. 513; The Alabama and The Gamecock, 92 U. S. 695; The Virginia Ehrman and The Agnese, 97 id. 309; The City of Hartford and The Unit, id. 323. As in this case the decree was against both vessels for the full amount of the loss, it should be modified so as to be against the “ Sterling ” and the *648 “ Equator,” and their respective stipulators, severally, each for one-half of the entire damage and costs, any balance of such half. Which the libellant shall not be able to enforce against either vessel to be paid by the other vessel or her stipulators, so far as her stipulated value extends. As it does not appear from the record. that the attention of the' court below was called to this objection to the form of the decree, each party will be required to pay his own costs in this court.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to enter a new decree in accordance with this opinion, adding interest to the date of such entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in admiralty against the ship “ Sterling ” and tow-boat “ Equator,” for damages sustained by the bark “ Sif ” in a collision. Both the ship and tow-boat were found to be in fault, and they were condemned in solido for the whole amount of the' loss. From a decree to that effect this appeal was taken.

It is conceded that upon the facts found the owners of the “ Sif ” are entitled to a decree against the ship and the towboat, as both were in fault. The well-established rule in such cases- is to apportion the damages equally between the two offending vessels, the right being reserved to the libellant to colléct the entire amount from either of them to the extent of her stipulated value, in case of the inability of the other to respond for her portion.. The Washington and The Gregory, 9 Wall. 513; The Alabama and The Gamecock, 92 U. S. 695; The Virginia Ehrman and The Agnese, 97 id. 309; The City of Hartford and The Unit, id. 323. As in this case the decree was against both vessels for the full amount of the loss, it should be modified so as to be against the “ Sterling ” and the *648 “ Equator,” and their respective stipulators, severally, each for one-half of the entire damage and costs, any balance of such half. Which the libellant shall not be able to enforce against either vessel to be paid by the other vessel or her stipulators, so far as her stipulated value extends. As it does not appear from the record. that the attention of the' court below was called to this objection to the form of the decree, each party will be required to pay his own costs in this court.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to enter a new decree in accordance with this opinion, adding interest to the date of such entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 U.S. 647, 1 S. Ct. 89, 27 L. Ed. 98, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-sterling-and-the-equator-scotus-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack