The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois State of Michigan v. The State of Illinois State of New York v. State of Illinois

279 U.S. 821
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 22, 1929
Docket7, original
StatusPublished

This text of 279 U.S. 821 (The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois State of Michigan v. The State of Illinois State of New York v. State of Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois State of Michigan v. The State of Illinois State of New York v. State of Illinois, 279 U.S. 821 (1929).

Opinion

279 U.S. 821

49 S.Ct. 349

73 L.Ed. 976

The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.; STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant, v. The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.; STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.

No. 7, original.

No. 11, original.

No. 12, original.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 1929

and

Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for the State of Wisconsin and others.

Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S. Cressy, Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy and Cyrus E. Dietz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and others.

Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Atty. Gen., A. B. Dougherty, William W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan.

Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Atty. Gen., of New York City, Albert J. Danaher, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Albany, N. Y., Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York.

Messrs. North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for intervener State of Missouri.

Mr. F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., for intervener State of Tennessee.

Mr. F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky., for intervener State of Kentucky.

Mr. Percy Saint, of New Orleans, La., for intervener State of Louisiana.

Mr. H. W. Applegate, of Little Rock, Ark., for intervener State of Arkansas.

Mr. Rush H. Knox, of Jackson, Miss., for intervener State of Mississippi.

Motion of the City of Chicago for leave to intervene denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connecticut v. Massachusetts
279 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 U.S. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-wisconsin-v-the-state-of-illinois-state-of-michigan-v-the-scotus-1929.