The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago

355 U.S. 944
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 3, 1958
Docket2, Original
StatusPublished

This text of 355 U.S. 944 (The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Wisconsin v. The State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago, 355 U.S. 944 (1958).

Opinion

355 U.S. 944

78 S.Ct. 528

2 L.Ed.2d 526

The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.

No. 2, Original.

The STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant,

v.

The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of

Chicago et al.

No. 3, Original.

STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant,

STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.

No. 4, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1958

Messrs. Stewart G. Honeck, Atty. Gen., and Ray Tulane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Wisconsin; Miles Lord, Atty. Gen., and Melvin J. Peterson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Minnesota; William Saxbe, Atty. Gen., and Robert E. Boyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Ohio; Thomas D. McBride, Atty Gen., and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Pennsylvania; Thomas M. Kavanagh, Atty. Gen., Samuel J. Torina, Sol. Gen., and Nicholas V. Olds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Michigan; and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., and John R. Davison, Sol. Gen., for State of New York, applicants-complainants.

Messrs. Latham Castle, Atty. Gen., of Illinois, William C. Wines, Asst. Atty. Gen., Russell W. Root, Lawrence J. Fenlon, Joseph B. Fleming and Thomas M. Thomas, for defendants.

Mr. Frederick M. Rowe, for defendants State of Illinois and Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago.

Solicitor General Rankin, Messrs. John F. Davis and David R. Warner, for the United States, as amicus curiae.

The application and motion herein are denied, with leave to renew the application and motion with allegations made more definite and certain as a basis for the relief sought.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wisconsin v. Illinois
355 U.S. 944 (Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 U.S. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-wisconsin-v-the-state-of-illinois-and-sanitary-district-of-scotus-1958.