The State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Missourt-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, and Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Intervening-Respondents. The State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Road-Rail Transportation Company, Inc., Intervening-Respondent
This text of 813 F.2d 679 (The State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Missourt-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, and Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Intervening-Respondents. The State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Road-Rail Transportation Company, Inc., Intervening-Respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
813 F.2d 679
The STATE OF TEXAS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,
Respondents,
Missourt-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company, and Southern Pacific
Transportation Company, Intervening-Respondents.
The STATE OF TEXAS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,
Respondents,
Road-Rail Transportation Company, Inc., Intervening-Respondent.
Nos. 84-4169, 84-4386.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 1, 1987.
Justin Scott Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for State of Tex.
H. Glenn Scammel, John Broadley, General Counsel, I.C.C., Wm. F. Smith, Atty. Gen., John J. Powers, III, John P. Fonte, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D.C., for respondents.
John P. Legendre, Dallas, Tex., Keith G. O'Brien, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-RRTC.
Michael E. Roper, Dallas, Tex., for Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.
John P. Legendre, Dallas, Tex., for Missouri Pacific R. Co.
Hugh L. McCulley, Houston, Tex., for Southern Pacific Transp. Co.
On Petition for Review of Interstate Commerce Commission Decision No. 39627.
On Petition for Review of Interstate Commerce Commission Decision No. 39704.
Before GARZA, POLITZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 787, 93 L.Ed.2d 809, having reversed and remanded for further proceedings by this court, it is now ordered that the petitions of the State of Texas for review of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission are DENIED, at its costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
813 F.2d 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-united-states-of-america-and-interstate-commerce-ca5-1987.