The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2025
Docket03-24-00033-CR
StatusPublished

This text of The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres (The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00033-CR NO. 03-24-00034-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Manuel Gutierrez Torres, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NOS. C-18-0137-SB & C-18-0860-SA, THE HONORABLE BARBARA L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The State has filed notices of appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing the

prosecutions in cause numbers C-18-0860-SA and C-18-0137-SB for failure to provide a speedy

trial to appellee Manuel Gutierrez Torres. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(a)(1). Torres’s

appointed appellate counsel, Madison Hagopian, has filed motions to substitute Don Payne as

counsel in the causes. In her motions, Hagopian advises this Court that she can no longer

represent Torres because of a change of employment.

The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent

defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a

finding of good cause. See id. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Accordingly, when counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s

responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Alvarado v. State, 562 S.W.3d 450, 450–51

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex.

App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 WL 363677, at *1

(Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

We therefore dismiss counsel’s motions to substitute, abate the appeals, and

remand the above causes to the trial court. If the trial court determines that good cause exists for

replacing counsel with substitute counsel, the trial court shall remove counsel and promptly

appoint substitute counsel for the appeals of these causes.

The trial court clerk is instructed to file with this Court no later than

March 14, 2025, a supplemental clerk’s record containing copies of the court’s order appointing

substitute counsel and the court’s order allowing counsel’s removal.

It is so ordered February 28, 2025.

Before Justices Theofanis, Crump, and Ellis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: February 28, 2025

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enriquez v. State
999 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Julio Alvarado v. State
562 S.W.3d 450 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-manuel-gutierrez-torres-texapp-2025.