The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres
This text of The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres (The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00033-CR NO. 03-24-00034-CR
The State of Texas, Appellant
v.
Manuel Gutierrez Torres, Appellee
FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NOS. C-18-0137-SB & C-18-0860-SA, THE HONORABLE BARBARA L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The State has filed notices of appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing the
prosecutions in cause numbers C-18-0860-SA and C-18-0137-SB for failure to provide a speedy
trial to appellee Manuel Gutierrez Torres. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(a)(1). Torres’s
appointed appellate counsel, Madison Hagopian, has filed motions to substitute Don Payne as
counsel in the causes. In her motions, Hagopian advises this Court that she can no longer
represent Torres because of a change of employment.
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a
finding of good cause. See id. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Accordingly, when counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s
responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Alvarado v. State, 562 S.W.3d 450, 450–51
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex.
App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 WL 363677, at *1
(Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motions to substitute, abate the appeals, and
remand the above causes to the trial court. If the trial court determines that good cause exists for
replacing counsel with substitute counsel, the trial court shall remove counsel and promptly
appoint substitute counsel for the appeals of these causes.
The trial court clerk is instructed to file with this Court no later than
March 14, 2025, a supplemental clerk’s record containing copies of the court’s order appointing
substitute counsel and the court’s order allowing counsel’s removal.
It is so ordered February 28, 2025.
Before Justices Theofanis, Crump, and Ellis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: February 28, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The State of Texas v. Manuel Gutierrez Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-manuel-gutierrez-torres-texapp-2025.