the State of Texas v. Joseph Turner

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2022
Docket02-22-00019-CR
StatusPublished

This text of the State of Texas v. Joseph Turner (the State of Texas v. Joseph Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the State of Texas v. Joseph Turner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-22-00018-CR No. 02-22-00019-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JOSEPH TURNER

On Appeal from the 235th District Court Cooke County, Texas Trial Court No. CR21-00132, CR21-00133

ABATEMENT ORDER

We have considered the “Motion To Withdraw As Counsel” filed by

appellant’s retained counsel, Dan L. Wyde.

The motion is GRANTED. The Hon. Dan L. Wyde is permitted to withdraw

as attorney of record for appellant.

It is ORDERED that this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the

trial court. The trial court shall conduct a hearing with appellant present to:

1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; 2. Determine whether appellant is indigent;

3. If appellant is determined to be indigent, determine whether counsel should be appointed to represent appellant and appoint counsel, if necessary;1

4. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975), and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App.1987), and determine whether appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is competently and intelligently made; and

5. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to ensure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal.

Appellant may participate remotely, such as by telephone, videoconference, or

other appropriate and reasonable means, unless the trial court determines that it is

necessary to have appellant appear in person.

The trial court shall make findings and file a record of the hearing in this court

on or before Wednesday, July 27, 2022. The record shall include a supplemental

reporter’s record and supplemental clerk’s record. On our receipt of the supplemental

record, the appeal of this cause shall be automatically reinstated without further order.

1 If counsel has been appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental record shall reflect that appointed counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in the county for a reasonable period of time to allow appointed counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.

2 We direct the clerk of this court to send a notice of this order to the appellant,

Hon. Dan L. Wyde, the State’s attorney, the trial judge, the trial court clerk, and the

court reporter.

Dated June 27, 2022.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Hubbard v. State
739 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the State of Texas v. Joseph Turner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-joseph-turner-texapp-2022.