The State of Texas v. Ivan Galindo-Chavez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 4, 2023
Docket04-22-00738-CR
StatusPublished

This text of The State of Texas v. Ivan Galindo-Chavez (The State of Texas v. Ivan Galindo-Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Texas v. Ivan Galindo-Chavez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00738-CR

The STATE of Texas, Appellant

v.

Ivan GALINDO-CHAVEZ, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,799 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 4, 2023

AFFIRMED

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Ivan Galindo-Chavez habeas relief. We

affirm the trial court’s order.

BACKGROUND

As part of Operation Lone Star (“OLS”), Galindo-Chavez, a noncitizen, was arrested for

trespassing on private property in Zapata County. He filed an application for writ of habeas

corpus seeking dismissal of the criminal charge based on a violation of his state and federal rights 04-22-00738-CR

to equal protection. Specifically, Galindo-Chavez argued the State of Texas was engaging in

selective prosecution because only men were being charged with misdemeanor criminal trespass.

On September 14, 2022, the trial court held a hearing and heard testimony from Claudia

Molina of the Lubbock Private Defender’s Office (“LPDO”), who testified Galindo-Chavez had

been arrested on August 5, 2022 for criminal trespass as part of OLS. According to Molina, she

was unaware of any women who have been prosecuted for misdemeanor trespass as part of OLS,

and based on a report concerning OLS cases with appointed counsel through the LPDO, none of

the five thousand trespass cases involved women. The trial court granted Galindo-Chavez’s

requested relief, and the State appealed.

DISCUSSION

The habeas proceeding in this appeal occurred concurrently with the proceeding we

reviewed in State v. Del Campo-Chavez, No. 04-22-00737-CR, 2023 WL 4916433, at *1 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio Aug. 2, 2023, no pet. h.). On appeal, the State is asserting the same arguments

it asserted in that appeal. See id. at *2–3. Because this appeal involves the same arguments and

same evidentiary record as State v. Del Campo-Chavez, for the reasons explained in that opinion,

we affirm the trial court’s order granting habeas relief. See id.

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Do Not Publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The State of Texas v. Ivan Galindo-Chavez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-ivan-galindo-chavez-texapp-2023.