The State of Texas v. Brent William Curry
This text of The State of Texas v. Brent William Curry (The State of Texas v. Brent William Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00308-CR NO. 03-26-00309-CR NO. 03-26-00310-CR NO. 03-26-00311-CR NO. 03-26-00312-CR
The State of Texas, Appellant
v.
Brent William Curry, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NOS. CR2020-667D, CR2022-063D, CR2024-715D, CR2025-1022D, CR2025-1023D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The State filed notices of appeal from “any Trial Court Orders, Rulings, and Bail
Determinations.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(a)(7). The State says that in at least three
of these failure-to-appear cases, the trial court orally granted “PR bonds” to appellee, and that
appealable orders “were apparently entered on or about March 11, 2026.” The Code of Criminal
Procedure allows the state’s appeal of a court order granting bail in an amount that a prosecuting
attorney considers insufficient. Id. The time for a prosecuting attorney’s appeal begins on the
date that the order or ruling to be appealed is “entered by the court,” id. art. 44.01(d), meaning
from “the signing of an order by the trial judge.” State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398, 402
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Abduljabbar, No. 03-24-00708-CR, 2025 WL 492507, at *6 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 14, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The
clerk’s records do not contain any written trial-court orders granting PR bonds to appellee.
However, the reporter’s record of a March 11 bond-reduction hearing for three of
these cases contains the trial court’s approval of such bonds: “I’ll approve the personal bonds,
but with the condition to include GPS monitoring to be paid for by the defendant.” Cf.
Abduljabbar, 2025 WL 492507, at *6-7 (declining state’s request for abatement of its appeal and
concluding that there was no existing order to be memorialized in writing on remand where trial
court stated on record that it had not signed any order and was withholding any ruling). Under
the circumstances presented, we abate these appeals and remand these causes to the trial court for
entry of signed orders memorializing its oral ruling approving personal bonds on appellee’s
motions for bail reduction.
It is ordered April 3, 2026.
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Ellis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: April 3, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The State of Texas v. Brent William Curry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-v-brent-william-curry-txctapp3-2026.