The State of Texas for the Best Interest and Protection of A.L. v. the State of Texas
This text of The State of Texas for the Best Interest and Protection of A.L. v. the State of Texas (The State of Texas for the Best Interest and Protection of A.L. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00029-CV
THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF A.L.
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 Travis County, Texas1 Trial Court No. C-1-MH-22-002022, Honorable Guy Herman, Presiding
March 6, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, A.L., proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Order Authorizing
the Administration of Psychoactive Medication - Forensic. We remand the cause to the
trial court for further proceedings.
Dr. Ziyad Nuwayhid, on behalf of Appellee, the State of Texas, filed an application
for an order authorizing the administration of psychoactive medication to A.L. On
December 14, 2023, the trial court entered an order authorizing administration of the
Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 1
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. medication after a hearing in which A.L. was represented by appointed counsel, Mr.
Daniel Eduardo Garza. A.L. filed a notice of appeal from the order, pro se. That appeal
was later transferred to this Court. Although A.L.’s brief was due prior to the transfer, no
brief was filed. By letter of February 3, 2023, we notified Appellant’s counsel that the brief
was overdue and directed him to file a brief by February 13. We admonished him that
the cause would be remanded to the trial court if a brief was not received by this deadline.
Appellant’s counsel has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this
Court to date.
Section 574.104 of the Health and Safety Code permits a court with probate
jurisdiction to issue an order authorizing the administration of psychoactive medication to
a patient receiving court-ordered inpatient mental health services. When an application
for administration of psychoactive medication is filed, the patient is entitled to
representation by court-appointed counsel and may appeal an order issued to a court of
appeals. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 574.003 (requiring immediate appointment
of counsel), 574.004(h) (concerning the duration of court-appointed representation),
574.105 (identifying the rights of the patient), 574.108(a) (permitting appeal).
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to
determine: (1) whether Mr. Garza represents A.L. on appeal; (2) if so, why a timely
appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant; (3) whether Appellant has been
denied the effective assistance of counsel; and (4) whether new counsel should be
appointed to represent A.L. on appeal. If it is determined that Appellant has been denied
the effective assistance of appellate counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel; the
2 name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the trial court’s findings.
Due to the expedited nature of this appeal, a supplemental clerk’s record
containing the trial court’s findings and any orders issued shall be filed with the Clerk of
this Court on or before March 20, 2023. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§
574.070(e) (“The court of appeals and supreme court shall give an appeal under this
section preference over all other cases and shall advance the appeal on the docket.”),
574.108(a).
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The State of Texas for the Best Interest and Protection of A.L. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-texas-for-the-best-interest-and-protection-of-al-v-the-texapp-2023.