The State of Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company

304 U.S. 546
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 31, 1938
Docket1, Original
StatusPublished

This text of 304 U.S. 546 (The State of Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State of Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company, 304 U.S. 546 (1938).

Opinion

304 U.S. 546

58 S.Ct. 1035

82 L.Ed. 1519

The STATE OF GEORGIA, complainant,
v.
TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY et al.

No. 1, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 16, 1938

Messrs. John C. Hart, of Atlanta, Ga., and Ligon Johnson, of New York City, for complainant.

Martin A. Vogel, of New York City, and Howard Cornick, of Prescott, Ariz., for defendant.

Decree entered vacating all orders and decrees which have heretofore been entered in this cause against The Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Company, Ltd., and Tennessee Copper Company excepting insofar as they relate to the taxation of costs, and the cause dismissed. A rule is ordered to issue returnable on May 26, next, requiring the Ducktown Chemical & Iron Company to show cause why it should not pay costs charged against the defendant Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Compny, Ltd .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northern Pacific R. v. United States
304 U.S. 545 (Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 U.S. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-of-georgia-v-tennessee-copper-company-scotus-1938.