The State of Georgia v. Brian-Scott Nettles

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10322

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

THE STATE OF GEORGIA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRIAN-SCOTT NETTLES,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cv-00266-RWS

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10322

Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Brian-Scott Nettles, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding to state court a case in which he was charged with various state criminal offenses. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.