The Stanley Works v. United States

Federal Circuit

The Stanley Works v. United States

53 F.3d 344, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40791, 1994 WL 746058

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 9, 1994·No. 94-1216·Published

Opinion

53 F.3d 344
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

The STANLEY WORKS, Defendant-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant.

No. 94-1216.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 1994.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 344
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

The STANLEY WORKS, Defendant-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant.

No. 94-1216.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 1994.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

The Stanley Works v. United States, 53 F.3d 344, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40791, 1994 WL 746058 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

53 F.3d 344 (The Stanley Works v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.