The Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, the Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission
This text of 91 F.3d 1350 (The Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, the Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WASHINGTON STATE, The State of Washington; Booth Gardner,
Governor of the State of Washington; Ken Eikenberry,
Attorney General of the State of Washington; Franklin L.
Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling
Commission, Defendants-Appellants.
The SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WASHINGTON STATE, The State of Washington; Booth Gardner,
Governor of the State of Washington; Ken Eikenberry,
Attorney General of the State of Washington; Franklin L.
Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling
Commission, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 92-35113, 92-35446.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 1996.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.ORDER
The Supreme Court's decision in Washington v. Spokane Tribe of Indians, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1410, 134 L.Ed.2d 537 (1996), vacated and remanded this court's decision, reported at 28 F.3d 991 (9th Cir.1994), for reconsideration in light of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). In light of that decision, the decision of the district court dismissing the action against the State of Washington is affirmed. The decision of the district court to permit the case to go forward against the individual defendants is vacated and the case remanded with instructions to dismiss the action against individual defendants. The mandate of this court shall issue immediately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F.3d 1350, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5842, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-spokane-tribe-of-indians-v-washington-state-the-state-of-washington-ca9-1996.