The Sea Flower
21 F. Cas. 908, 1 Blatchf. 361
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided October 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
held that exclusive credit for the advance was given to the underwriters, that no lien existed on the vessel for its repayment, and, especially, that the lien could not, under the circumstances, be set up against the title of a bona fide purchaser. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Sea Flower, 21 F. Cas. 908, 1 Blatchf. 361 (circtsdny 1848).
21 F. Cas. 908 (The Sea Flower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rickard v. The James Farrell
36 F. 500 (S.D. New York, 1888)