The Sea Flower
21 F. Cas. 908, 1 Blatchf. 361
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1848
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 21 F. Cas. 908 (The Sea Flower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
The Sea Flower, 21 F. Cas. 908, 1 Blatchf. 361 (circtsdny 1848).
Opinion
held that exclusive credit for the advance was given to the underwriters, that no lien existed on the vessel for its repayment, and, especially, that the lien could not, under the circumstances, be set up against the title of a bona fide purchaser. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rickard v. The James Farrell
36 F. 500 (S.D. New York, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 F. Cas. 908, 1 Blatchf. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-sea-flower-circtsdny-1848.