The Sanday

122 F.2d 325, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2964, 1941 A.M.C. 1249
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 14, 1941·No. 365·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The collision occurred in the Oswego River section of the barge canal about 1,500 feet southerly from Walters Island. The southbound Michigan met the northbound tug Craig with a tow of six light barges, and in attempting a port to port passage collided with the last barge of the tow. Since the libellant was the owner of both barge and tug it was stipulated that any fault in the towing vessel should be visited upon the libellant as owner of the barge. The barge was tailing off to her port but the district judge excused her failure to be in line because the channel was winding and some swing of the tow was inevitable. The Michigan was held solely responsible because she had ample opportunity to avoid the collision had she reduced her speed as soon as her master saw the danger of the situation. The appellant urges that the tug’s admission that her tow tailed over onto the wrong side of a narrow channel is a confession of statutory fault which necessarily imposes liability. But the navigator of the Michigan saw the situation when the vessels were 1,800 feet apart; he said it looked bad when he sounded his one blast signal, but he did nothing to reduce his speed for “a minute or so after”. The trial judge found this delay crucial. We see no reason to doubt the finding or the legal conclusion of the Michigan’s responsibility under the last clear chance doctrine. See The Watuppa, 2 Cir., 120 F.2d 766, decided June 9, 1941. As to the tug’s failure to sound a bend signal it will suffice to say that this was immaterial, since the Michigan sighted her in time to have avoided the collision had she not tried to shave too close.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Sanday, 122 F.2d 325, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2964, 1941 A.M.C. 1249 (2d Cir. 1941).

122 F.2d 325 (The Sanday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S. C. Loveland, Inc. v. East West Towing, Inc.
608 F.2d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
TIGER SHIPPING COMPANY, SA v. Tug Carville
381 F. Supp. 1340 (E.D. Virginia, 1974)
Houma Well Service, Inc. v. Tug Capt. O'Brien
312 F. Supp. 257 (E.D. Louisiana, 1970)
Wasson Barge Rental Co. v. Tug Carrie D
296 F. Supp. 933 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)
In re Kinsman Transit Co.
338 F.2d 708 (Second Circuit, 1964)
In re Texaco, Inc.
210 F. Supp. 390 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Chemical Transporter, Inc. v. M. Turecamo, Inc.
290 F.2d 496 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Arundel Corp. v. City of Calcutta
172 F. Supp. 593 (E.D. New York, 1958)
Williamson v. the Tug Carolina
158 F. Supp. 417 (E.D. North Carolina, 1958)
Richmond v. The Tug Connie C. Cenac
157 F. Supp. 397 (E.D. Louisiana, 1957)
Crawford v. Indian Towing Company
240 F.2d 308 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Crawford v. Indian Towing Co.
240 F.2d 308 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Indian Towing Co. v. The M/V Suwannee
139 F. Supp. 547 (E.D. Louisiana, 1956)
Pure Oil Co. v. The F. B. Walker
127 F. Supp. 867 (E.D. Louisiana, 1955)
In Re Adams'petition
125 F. Supp. 110 (S.D. New York, 1954)