The Ryan N. Rice 2018 Irrevocable Trust v. Rehab.com, LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 11, 2026
• Docket: 25-1489
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1489 Doc: 22 Filed: 06/11/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1489

THE RYAN N. RICE 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUST,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REHAB.COM, LLC; CCR HOLDINGS, LLC; PATRICK NAGLE,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:22-cv-03003-JRR)

Submitted: May 14, 2026 Decided: June 11, 2026

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Gerard P. Martin, Jeffrey M. Lichtstein, ROSENBERG MARTIN GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Michael Evan Blumenfeld, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1489 Doc: 22 Filed: 06/11/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions to seal the

complaint and to reconsider the denial, which were filed after the parties settled the case

and the case was dismissed with prejudice. We have jurisdiction over the appeal. See

United States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143-45 (4th Cir. 2020). We deny the motion to expand

the record and limit our review to the record on appeal as defined in Fed. R. App. P. 10(a).

See United States v. Heyward, 42 F.4th 460, 467 n.3 (4th Cir. 2022) (“Rule 10(e) ‘does not

grant a license to build a new record’ on appeal”). We have reviewed the record and

Appellants’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s orders. See The Ryan N. Rice 2018 Irrevocable Tr. v. Rehab.com, LLC,

No. 1:22-cv-03003-JRR (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2024; Oct. 28, 2024). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED