The Rose Reichert

279 F. 268, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1535
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1922
DocketNo. 83
StatusPublished

This text of 279 F. 268 (The Rose Reichert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Rose Reichert, 279 F. 268, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1535 (2d Cir. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to tax the cost of printing the briefs is denied. Such costs have never been taxed in this court, except 'in admiralty cases, which was allowed under our rules in admiralty. When the rules of this court were revised in 1918, this rule was changed to conform to the practice in other cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F. 268, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-rose-reichert-ca2-1922.