Home/Second Circuit/The Rose Reichert

The Rose Reichert

279 F. 268, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1535
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 11, 1922·No. No. 83·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to tax the cost of printing the briefs is denied. Such costs have never been taxed in this court, except 'in admiralty cases, which was allowed under our rules in admiralty. When the rules of this court were revised in 1918, this rule was changed to conform to the practice in other cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Rose Reichert, 279 F. 268, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1535 (2d Cir. 1922).

279 F. 268 (The Rose Reichert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.