The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan
156 So. 879, 116 Fla. 339, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1059
Opinions
Appellant brought a bill of complaint to cancel a mortgage and for an accounting. The court dismissed the bill of complaint as to two of the defendants, *Page 340 with leave to amend, and later finally dismissed the bill of complaint as to such two defendants, and denied a rehearing. Complainant appealed.
No material error appears by the record. The decrees are severally affirmed.
DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
BROWN, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan, 156 So. 879, 116 Fla. 339, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1059 (Fla. 1934).
156 So. 879 (The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.