The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Florida

The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan

156 So. 879, 116 Fla. 339, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1059

DecidedJuly 24, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 879 (The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Robert Hungerford Indus. School v. Jordan, 156 So. 879, 116 Fla. 339, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1059 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

Appellant brought a bill of complaint to cancel a mortgage and for an accounting. The court dismissed the bill of complaint as to two of the defendants, *Page 340 with leave to amend, and later finally dismissed the bill of complaint as to such two defendants, and denied a rehearing. Complainant appealed.

No material error appears by the record. The decrees are severally affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

BROWN, J., dissents.

SECOND APPEAL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant brought a bill of complaint to cancel a mortgage and for an accounting. The court dismissed the bill of complaint as to two of the defendants, *Page 340 with leave to amend, and later finally dismissed the bill of complaint as to such two defendants, and denied a rehearing. Complainant appealed.

No material error appears by the record. The decrees are severally affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

BROWN, J., dissents.

SECOND APPEAL

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 879, 116 Fla. 339, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-robert-hungerford-indus-school-v-jordan-fla-1934.