the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla

Court of Appeals of Texas

the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla

DecidedJune 21, 2007

Docket13-07-00308-CV

StatusPublished

This text of the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla (the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-308-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL ESCAMILLA, M.D., Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO, perfected an appeal from an order entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2195-C. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that it longer wishes to pursue this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of June, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-07-308-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL ESCAMILLA, M.D., Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO, perfected an appeal from an order entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2195-C. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that it longer wishes to pursue this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of June, 2007.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

the Regents of the University of California v. Dr. Michael Escamilla, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-regents-of-the-university-of-california-v-dr-m-texapp-2007.