The Regency NYC, Inc. v. Atkinson

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 6, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-05479·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ——— Ee | Case No.: 1:23-cv-05479 (JGLC) (RWL) THE REGENCY NYC, INC., | RBROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, -against- BARBARA ATKINSON and WORTH HIGGINS & | ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendants, The Court enters the following Protective Order governing the disclosure of confidential Discovery Material by a Producing Party to a Receiving Party in this Action. 1) Definitions. As used in this Order: a. Action refers to the above-captioned litigation. b. Discovery Material includes all information exchanged between the parties, whether gathered through informal requests or communications between the parties or their counsel or gathered through formal discovery conducted pursuant to Rules 30 through 36, and Rule 45. Discovery Material includes information within documents, depositions, deposition exhibits, and other written, recorded, computerized, electronic or graphic matter, copies, and excerpts or summaries of documents disclosed as required under Rule 26(a). c. A Producing Party is a party to this litigation, or a non-party either acting on a party’s behalf or responding to discovery pursuant to a Rule 45 subpoena, which produces Discovery Material in this Action. d. A Receiving Party is a party to this litigation that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party in this Action. 2) Confidential Discovery Material. This Protective Order applies to all confidential Discovery Material produced or obtained in this case. For the purposes of this Protective Order, confidential Discovery Material shall include: a. Commercial information relating to any party’s business including, but not limited to, tax data, financial information, financial or business plans or projections, proposed strategic transactions or other business combinations, internal audit practices, procedures, and outcomes, trade secrets or other commercially sensitive business or technical information, proprietary business and marketing plans and strategies, studies or analyses by internal or outside experts, competitive analyses, customer or prospective customer lists and information,

profit/loss information, product or service pricing or billing agreements or guidelines, and/or confidential project-related information; b, Personnel data of the parties or their employees, including but not limited to employment application information; the identity of and information received from employment references; wage and income information; benefits information; employee evaluations; medical evaluation and treatment information and records; counseling or mental health records, educational records; and employment counseling, discipline, or performance improvement documentation; c. Information concerning settlement discussions and mediation, including demands or offers, arising from a dispute between a party anda non-party; d, Medical or mental health information; e. Records restricted or prohibited from disclosure by statute; and f. Any information copied or extracted from the previously described materials, including all excerpts, summaries, or compilations of this information or testimony, and documentation of questioning, statements, conversations, or presentations that might reveal the information contained within the underlying confidential Discovery Material. 3} Manner of Confidential Designation. A Producing Party shall affix a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation to any confidential Discovery Material produced in this Action. a. As to documentary information (defined to include paper or electronic documents, but not transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Producing Party must affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. b. If only a portion or portions of the information on a document page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by using highlighting, underlining, or appropriate markings in the margins). c. If it is not feasible to label confidential Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” the Producing Party shall indicate via cover letter or otherwise at the time of production that the material being produced is CONFIDENTIAL.

4) Timing of Confidential Designation. a. Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered, or where discovery is made available for inspection before it is formally disclosed, Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. b. If the Producing Party responds to discovery by making Discovery Material available for inspection, the Producing Party need not affix confidential designations until after the Receiving Party has selected the material it wants to receive. During the inspection and before the designation, all material made available for inspection is deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the Receiving Party has identified the Discovery Material it wants produced, the Producing Party must determine which materials, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, and designate the materials as “CONFIDENTIAL” as required under this order. 5) Qualified Recipients. For the purposes of this Protective Order, the persons authorized to receive confidential Discovery Material (hereinafter “Qualified Recipient”) are: a. The Parties, including any members, officers, board members, directors, employees, or other legal representatives of the parties. b. Legal counsel representing the parties, and members of the paralegal, secretarial, or clerical staff who are employed by, retained by, or assisting such counsel; including vendors who are retained to copy documents or electronic files, provide technical, litigation support, or mock trial services, or provide messenger or other administrative support services. c. Any non-expert witness during any deposition or other proceeding in this Action, and counsel for that witness. d. Potential witnesses and their counsel, but only to the extent reasonably related to the anticipated subject matter of the potential witness’s deposition, trial, or hearing testimony for this Action, so long as such persons agree to maintain the confidential Discovery Material in confidence per the terms of this Order, and provided that such persons may only be shown copies of confidential Discovery Material and may not retain any such material. e. Consulting or testifying expert witnesses who will be providing professional opinions or assistance for this Action based upon a review of the CONFIDENTIAL information, and the staff and assistants employed by the consulting or testifying experts.

f. Any mediator or arbitrator retained by the parties to assist with resolving and/or settling the claims of this Action and members of the arbitrator’s or mediator’s staff and assistants. g. The parties’ insurers for this Action, and their staff and assistants, members, officers, board members, directors or other legal representatives. h. Court reporters for depositions taken in this Action, including persons operating video recording equipment and persons preparing transcripts of testimony. i. The Court and its staff, any court reporter or typist recording or transcribing hearings and testimony, and jurors; and □□ Any auditor or regulator of a party is entitled to review the confidential Discovery Material due to contractual rights or obligations, or federal or state laws, or court orders, but solely for such contractual or legal purposes. 6) Dissemination by the Receiving Party. Counsel for the Receiving Party shall: a. Require Qualified Recipients who are non-expert witnesses or expert witnesses and consultants and who receive information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” to review and agree to the terms of this Protective Order and execute a copy of the Agreement attached hereto as Appendix A before receiving confidential Discovery Material. b.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Regency NYC, Inc. v. Atkinson, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

The Regency NYC, Inc. v. Atkinson (The Regency NYC, Inc. v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)