The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P. v. The Estate of Bassett S. Winmill
This text of The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P. v. The Estate of Bassett S. Winmill (The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P. v. The Estate of Bassett S. Winmill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
THE RAVENSWOOD INVESTMENT § COMPANY, L.P., individually, § derivatively and on behalf of a class of § similarly situated persons, § No. 496, 2018 § Plaintiff-Below, § Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § Court Below: § Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware § THE ESTATE OF BASSETT S. § WINMILL, THOMAS B. WINMILL, § C.A. Nos. 3730-VCS MARK C. WINMILL and WINMILL § 7048- VCS & CO. INCORPORATED, § § Defendants-Below, § Appellees/Cross-Appellants. §
Submitted: April 24, 2019 Decided: May 3, 2019
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 3rd day of May, 2019, regarding Appellant’s appeal and having considered this
matter on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having
concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons assigned
by the Court of Chancery in its Final Judgment dated August 29, 2018; Revised Post-Trial
Memorandum Opinion dated March 22, 2018; Letter Opinion Concerning Plaintiff’s
Motion for Reargument and/or to Alter or Amend a Judgment dated April 27, 2018; Oral
Ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, Defendants’ Motion
to Quash, and Rulings of the Court dated May 12, 2016; Order implementing telephonic ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss dated February
26, 2016; Memorandum Opinion and Order on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss dated May
31, 2011; and Letter Decision on Motion to Reargue dated November 30, 2011;
And regarding Appellees’ Cross-Appeal and having concluded that the same should
be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its
transcript ruling dated August 15, 2018;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of the Court of
Chancery be, and the same hereby are, AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P. v. The Estate of Bassett S. Winmill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-ravenswood-investment-company-lp-v-the-estate-of-bassett-s-winmill-del-2019.