The Quoddy

289 F. 132, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1593, 1923 A.M.C. 997
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedMarch 31, 1923
DocketNo. 2137
StatusPublished

This text of 289 F. 132 (The Quoddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Quoddy, 289 F. 132, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1593, 1923 A.M.C. 997 (D. Mass. 1923).

Opinion

PETERS, District Judge.

This is a claim of salvage. It appears that the steam screw Quoddy, on the afternoon of October 20, 1921, was returning to Gloucester with a trip of fresh fish from the fishing grounds southeast of the Isles of Shoals, when her tail shaft broke and the engine became useless.

The master of the Quoddy made an attempt to set sail and make his way back to Isles of Shoals, but without success, as the wind was unfavorable. About this time the vessel sprang a leak, which was kept under control with the pumps. This occurred about 18 miles northeast of Annisquam.

The steam screw Robert and Edward, owned by Henry E. Pinkham Company, George Hill, master, also bound for Gloucester with a trip of fish, being in the vicinity, at about 2 o’clock p. m., came to the assistance of the Quoddy, and at the request of her master made fast to her with hawsers and took her in tow for Gloucester, where they arrived that night a little after midnight.

• The engineer was not able to repair the damage to the machinery of the Quoddy before arrival in port. She could not have made port that day or night under such sail as she had. Probably she would have been blown off shore until the wind changed or'other assistance arrived, had not the Robert and Edward come to her rescue. She was not in any particular danger of sinking, however, nor was there apprehension of such a catastrophe.

It is agreed that, for the purposes of this case, the value of the Quoddy was $4,000, the value of her catch of fish on board $184, and her nets about $250. No claim was made for loss of market or depreciation in value of the fish on board the Robert and Edward, resulting from delay in reaching port on account of the salvage service, and no claim was made that she was consequently delayed in going out on her next [133]*133trip. The captain testifies that he and his crew were considerably exhausted by the labor in getting the Quoddy into port.

This is a salvage service of a rather low order. The risk, labor, and time involved were inconsiderable, but, on the other hand, the disabled vessel might have been blown off to sea, and subjected to the danger of further disaster, if she had not been taken in tow by the libelants.

Taking into consideration all the elements of the case, I make an award of $175 of which $100 is to go to the vessel, and $75 to the master and crew, to be divided in proportion to their monthly wages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F. 132, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1593, 1923 A.M.C. 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-quoddy-mad-1923.