The Pullman Company v. Florence R. Rice and Jack S. Rice

182 F.2d 351, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 14, 1950·No. 13001·Published

Opinion

182 F.2d 351

The PULLMAN COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Florence R. RICE and Jack S. Rice, Appellees.

No. 13001.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 14, 1950.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Sidney C. Mize, Judge.

William F. McGehee, R. L. Dent, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellant.

Landman Teller, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellees.

Before HOLMES, WALLER and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We think that the facts in this case justified the presentation to the jury of the issue as to punitive damages and that such issue was submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions; wherefore, the verdicts should not be disturbed, and the judgments appealed from should be, and they are,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Pullman Company v. Florence R. Rice and Jack S. Rice, 182 F.2d 351, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813 (5th Cir. 1950).

182 F.2d 351 (The Pullman Company v. Florence R. Rice and Jack S. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.