The Prince Leopold

9 F. 333
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1881·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pardee, C. J.

An unexecuted contract of affreightment gives no maritime lien. 18 How. 188; 19 How. 90. An unexecuted contract for furnishing supplies carries no lien. The Cabarga, 3 Blatchf. 75. An unexecuted contract for wages, where the voyage was never begun and no services rendered, furnishes no lien. 1 W. Rob. 89, cited in 19 How. 90. Admiralty and maritime liens aro not given by implication. 19 How. 89. No reason is given why an unexecuted contract to furnish towage to a vessel should stand on any better footing than though the contract related to freight, wages, or materials. It is claimed that towage is a part of the voyage, (22 How. 244;) but that must be understood as towage actually furnished. The owners may have contracts with a dozen different tow-boats thaeach shall tow the ship, but it is only the ones actually towing the vessel that help begin or complete the voyage.

Let there be a decree maintaining the exception filed,' and dismissing the libel, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Prince Leopold, 9 F. 333 (circtedla 1881).

9 F. 333 (The Prince Leopold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith & Terry, Inc. v. Clinton
242 F. 582 (E.D. Virginia, 1917)
The Strathnairn
190 F. 673 (W.D. Washington, 1911)
The Francesco
116 F. 83 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1902)
The Priscilla
114 F. 836 (Second Circuit, 1902)
The Ripon City
102 F. 176 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)