The Plainfield

205 F. 730, 124 C.C.A. 24, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1493
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 12, 1913
DocketNo. 234
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 F. 730 (The Plainfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Plainfield, 205 F. 730, 124 C.C.A. 24, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1493 (2d Cir. 1913).

Opinion

WARD, Circuit Judge.

January 19, 1912, at 7 a. m., the steam lighter Guy G. Major left Elm Park, Staten Island, with the barge Evening Star in tow on a hawser. When about off Ellis Island fog' si mt in, and when about opposite the Jersey Central ferry slips and in the middle of the river, the lighter stopped to take the barge alongside. At this time the ferryboat Plainfield, coming from New York on her way across the river to Communipaw, struck the lighter on the star-hoard side near the bow, doing some damage. The District Judge held both vessels at fault; the lighter for having no lookout', and the ferryboat for proceeding at such speed in the fog that, when she discovered the lighter, she was unable to stop in time to avoid a collision. The , ferryboat appealed.

[1, 2] There can be no doubt about the fault of the lighter. The proof is that she did blow the fog signals required by law, but she was flagrantly at fault for keeping no lookout in such a dense fog. The District Judge reluctantly; held the ferryboat at fault for violating the rule laid down by the courts as to speed in a fog. He described the rule as harsh and cruel. It must, however, be remembered that it is subject to the limitation, in the case of an approaching vessel, that such vessel must be going at a moderate speed. The Umbria, 166 U. S. 404, 417, 17 Sup. Ct. 610, 41 L. Ed. 1053. There is much to be said for the rule when applied in favor of a vessel at anchor, or going in die same direction, or, as in the case under consideration, though under way, not moving. We do not think that the word “navigate,” in article 16 of the Inland Rules (30 Stat. 99 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. [732]*7322880]) is to be construed as requiring that vessels in a fog shall keep moving.

The ferryboat was properly held liable, and the decree is affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The New London
271 F. 83 (Second Circuit, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 F. 730, 124 C.C.A. 24, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-plainfield-ca2-1913.