THE PERSONAL INJURY CLINIC, INC., A/A/O LOANYS MANZANO v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
This text of THE PERSONAL INJURY CLINIC, INC., A/A/O LOANYS MANZANO v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY (THE PERSONAL INJURY CLINIC, INC., A/A/O LOANYS MANZANO v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-0344 Lower Tribunal No. 14-2505 SP ________________
The Personal Injury Clinic, Inc., a/a/o Loanys Manzano, Appellant,
vs.
Allstate Indemnity Company, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Milena Abreu, Judge.
Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., and Chad A. Barr and Dalton L. Gray (Altamonte Springs), for appellant.
Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Daniel E. Nordby (Tallahassee), Jason Gonzalez (Tallahassee), and Garrett A. Tozier (Tampa), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Appellant (Plaintiff below) the Personal Injury Clinic, Inc. appeals from
a final judgment entered in favor of Appellee (Defendant below) Allstate
Indemnity Company. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that Allstate’s
policy provides legally sufficient notice of its election to use the fee schedules
identified in section 627.736(5)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2022). See Allstate
Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, 212 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 2017). However,
consistent with our decision in First Medical & Rehab of Bradenton, LLC v.
Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 343 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022),
we reverse and remand for further proceedings because Allstate did not
identify evidence in its motion for summary judgment showing it paid
pursuant to the fee schedules. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (2020)1 (“The
motion must . . . specifically identify any affidavits, answer to interrogatories,
admissions, depositions, and other materials as would be admissible in
evidence (‘summary judgment evidence’) on which the movant relies.”).
Affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded.
1 This case was decided under Florida’s former summary judgment standard.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
THE PERSONAL INJURY CLINIC, INC., A/A/O LOANYS MANZANO v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-personal-injury-clinic-inc-aao-loanys-manzano-v-allstate-fladistctapp-2022.