The Persiana

158 F. 912, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 20, 1907·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

HOUGH, District Judge.

It - has been the uniform practice of this court not to entertain motions to dismiss at the close of libelant’s case, unless the claimant or respondent also rests. If the party defendant considers that any testimony is necessary to overcome that offered by libelant, it should be produced, and the court not asked to dispose of the litigation before all the testimony is submitted.

Libelant’s motion - to reopen and introduce in evidence claimant’s depositions must be denied. He could have offered these depositions as part of his own case, but did not choose to do so. He was not surprised, and will therefore not be permitted to support his case by evidence at hand when the cause opened, but only sought to be used after both sides rested and argument developed infirmity in his deliberately chosen position.

The libel is dismissed; but as claimant did not offer his depositions in evidence he can tax neither costs nor disbursements in respect of said depositions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Persiana, 158 F. 912, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1907).

158 F. 912 (The Persiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mistretta v. S. S. Ocean Evelyn
243 F. Supp. 86 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Martin Marine Transp. Co. v. United States
66 F. Supp. 673 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)
Brooks v. United States
56 F. Supp. 743 (E.D. Virginia, 1944)
Hunt v. United States
17 F. Supp. 578 (S.D. New York, 1936)
The Carnia
1 F. Supp. 219 (S.D. New York, 1932)
The Suduffco
33 F.2d 775 (S.D. New York, 1929)
Alaska S. S. Co. v. Gilbert
236 F. 715 (Ninth Circuit, 1916)
United States v. Miller
223 F. 183 (S.D. Georgia, 1915)