The People v. William Sosa

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2016
Docket212 SSM 18
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. William Sosa (The People v. William Sosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. William Sosa, (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 212 SSM 18 The People &c., Appellant, v. William Sosa, Respondent.

Submitted by William Terrell, III, for appellant. Submitted by Jeffrey Delheim, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated. The record here evidences that defendant was aware that he had the right to a trial, had the benefit of his counsel's efforts and guidance,

- 1 - - 2 - SSM 18

spoke with counsel, and chose to forgo trial in favor of entering a guilty plea. Therefore, the totality of the circumstances establish the voluntariness of the plea (People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382-384 [2015]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed and judgment of Supreme Court, Bronx County, reinstated, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided September 20, 2016

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. William Sosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-william-sosa-ny-2016.