The People v. Vincent Carmona

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 7, 2021
Docket82 SSM 18
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. Vincent Carmona (The People v. Vincent Carmona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Vincent Carmona, (N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 82 SSM 18 The People &c., Respondent, v. Vincent Carmona, Appellant.

Submitted by Jonathan Rosenberg, for appellant. Submitted by Solomon Neubort, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by remitting to Supreme

Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified,

affirmed.

-1- -2- SSM No. 18

Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s pretrial request for a hearing pursuant

to People v Rodriguez (79 NY2d 445 [1992]), as the prosecutor here offered only bare

assurances that the witness was familiar with defendant. Further, the Appellate Division

erroneously relied on testimony adduced at trial to overcome the suppression court’s error.

“Thus, the case should be remitted to Supreme Court for a hearing to determine whether the [photographic] identification procedure was confirmatory. If, after that hearing, the court concludes that the People have not sustained their burden, a Wade hearing should be held and further proceedings, including a new trial, should be had as the circumstances may warrant. If the court concludes that a Wade hearing is not required, the judgment[] should be amended to reflect that result” (see Rodriguez, 79 NY2d at 453).

Defendant’s challenge to the weight of the evidence is unreviewable, and his

remaining contention is unpreserved.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order modified by remitting the case to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.

Decided October 7, 2021

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rodriguez
593 N.E.2d 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. Vincent Carmona, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-vincent-carmona-ny-2021.