The People v. Thomas Timko
This text of The People v. Thomas Timko (The People v. Thomas Timko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 83 SSM 19 The People &c., Respondent, v. Thomas Timko, Appellant.
Submitted by Michael S. Pollok, for appellant. Submitted by Brian R. Pouliot, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the accusatory instrument
dismissed.
As the People concede, the accusatory instrument was legally insufficient. The
allegations in the factual part of the instrument and in the supporting depositions did not
-1- -2- SSM No. 19
provide reasonable cause to believe that defendant communicated “a threat to cause
physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, [the complainant], or a member of
such person’s same family or household” (Penal Law § 240.30 [1] [a], as amended by L
2014, ch 188, § 1; see generally People v Golb, 23 NY3d 455, 466-468 [2014]).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and accusatory instrument dismissed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.
Decided October 7, 2021
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Thomas Timko, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-thomas-timko-ny-2021.