The People v. Thomas Timko

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 7, 2021
Docket83 SSM 19
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. Thomas Timko (The People v. Thomas Timko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Thomas Timko, (N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 83 SSM 19 The People &c., Respondent, v. Thomas Timko, Appellant.

Submitted by Michael S. Pollok, for appellant. Submitted by Brian R. Pouliot, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the accusatory instrument

dismissed.

As the People concede, the accusatory instrument was legally insufficient. The

allegations in the factual part of the instrument and in the supporting depositions did not

-1- -2- SSM No. 19

provide reasonable cause to believe that defendant communicated “a threat to cause

physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, [the complainant], or a member of

such person’s same family or household” (Penal Law § 240.30 [1] [a], as amended by L

2014, ch 188, § 1; see generally People v Golb, 23 NY3d 455, 466-468 [2014]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and accusatory instrument dismissed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.

Decided October 7, 2021

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Golb
15 N.E.3d 805 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. Thomas Timko, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-thomas-timko-ny-2021.